*/
The Bar Council backed the government’s plan to restructure payments to Crown court advocates while the Law Society warned it will cause bankruptcies, market failure and advice deserts.
Responding to the Ministry of Justice’s consultation, Reforming the Advocates’ Graduated Fee Scheme (AGFS), the Bar Council said it ‘supports’ the new structure, which will introduce a categorised system for payments rather than relying on the number of pages of prosecution evidence, and increase QCs’ fees by 10%.
But, it criticised the ‘inadequate’ rates and warned that years of falling fees had created an ‘unsustainable situation’ that ‘needs urgently rectifying’.
Many chambers, it said, had calculated that the changes will result in cuts to their income. It suggested running the old and new scheme in parallel for six to 12 months and called for ongoing reviews and adjustments.
The Bar Council also proposed index-linking payments to prevent future erosion by inflation and called for the Litigators’ Graduated Fee Scheme (LGFS) to be ‘rebalanced’ to reward litigators properly for case preparation.
But, in its response, the Law Society said the changes would make junior barristers and solicitor advocates ‘considerably worse off’ and warned they will cause firms to ‘go bankrupt, risking localised market failure and advice deserts, and jeopardising the administration of justice’.
Meanwhile, solicitors threatened strike action in protest over planned cuts to the LGFS that will reduce payments for preparation and slash the fees paid to court-appointed advocates by at least 75%.
The Bar Council backed the government’s plan to restructure payments to Crown court advocates while the Law Society warned it will cause bankruptcies, market failure and advice deserts.
Responding to the Ministry of Justice’s consultation, Reforming the Advocates’ Graduated Fee Scheme (AGFS), the Bar Council said it ‘supports’ the new structure, which will introduce a categorised system for payments rather than relying on the number of pages of prosecution evidence, and increase QCs’ fees by 10%.
But, it criticised the ‘inadequate’ rates and warned that years of falling fees had created an ‘unsustainable situation’ that ‘needs urgently rectifying’.
Many chambers, it said, had calculated that the changes will result in cuts to their income. It suggested running the old and new scheme in parallel for six to 12 months and called for ongoing reviews and adjustments.
The Bar Council also proposed index-linking payments to prevent future erosion by inflation and called for the Litigators’ Graduated Fee Scheme (LGFS) to be ‘rebalanced’ to reward litigators properly for case preparation.
But, in its response, the Law Society said the changes would make junior barristers and solicitor advocates ‘considerably worse off’ and warned they will cause firms to ‘go bankrupt, risking localised market failure and advice deserts, and jeopardising the administration of justice’.
Meanwhile, solicitors threatened strike action in protest over planned cuts to the LGFS that will reduce payments for preparation and slash the fees paid to court-appointed advocates by at least 75%.
A decade of cuts and the brutal pandemic have left courts and barristers struggling to cope – a bid for justice spending
The Lawyers’ Group of the Oasis of Peace UK are delighted to announce that on Thursday, 28 October 2021, Professor Philippe Sands QC will be delivering the 12th Rueff Lecture (via Zoom) entitled ‘Thinking About an International Rule of Law’
Inés Rivera explains how speech technology is transforming policing, courts and prisons
Philip N Bristow explains how to unlock your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step
With the property market witnessing significant changes since the beginning of the pandemic, Fleet Street Wealth’s Managing Director Julian Morgan considers the future of the home, the second home and the office
In partnership with the Bar Council, LexisNexis is offering up to 60% off its extensive webinar offering.
The family law system is in crisis and a failure to recognise it as such demeans the Herculean efforts of all involved, writes Celestine Greenwood, an exhausted family practitioner
Should we cap numbers coming to the Bar? Or help them make data driven decisions? asks IshanKolhatkar
Shifting the taboo, two silks talk about the menopause, its impact on women at the Bar and the need for a profession-wide rethink. By Lyndsey de Mestre QC and Brie Stevens-Hoare QC
In a profession which can be attached to, and defined by, archaic stereotypes, how to be yourself, explore new areas and own your own time? Here are Lennart Poulsen's 'lessons learnt'...
Other sectors have support staff in place for senior professionals, so why not the Bar? An established barrister/VA team and their matchmaker explain how they make it work
