*/
The Bar Council backed the government’s plan to restructure payments to Crown court advocates while the Law Society warned it will cause bankruptcies, market failure and advice deserts.
Responding to the Ministry of Justice’s consultation, Reforming the Advocates’ Graduated Fee Scheme (AGFS), the Bar Council said it ‘supports’ the new structure, which will introduce a categorised system for payments rather than relying on the number of pages of prosecution evidence, and increase QCs’ fees by 10%.
But, it criticised the ‘inadequate’ rates and warned that years of falling fees had created an ‘unsustainable situation’ that ‘needs urgently rectifying’.
Many chambers, it said, had calculated that the changes will result in cuts to their income. It suggested running the old and new scheme in parallel for six to 12 months and called for ongoing reviews and adjustments.
The Bar Council also proposed index-linking payments to prevent future erosion by inflation and called for the Litigators’ Graduated Fee Scheme (LGFS) to be ‘rebalanced’ to reward litigators properly for case preparation.
But, in its response, the Law Society said the changes would make junior barristers and solicitor advocates ‘considerably worse off’ and warned they will cause firms to ‘go bankrupt, risking localised market failure and advice deserts, and jeopardising the administration of justice’.
Meanwhile, solicitors threatened strike action in protest over planned cuts to the LGFS that will reduce payments for preparation and slash the fees paid to court-appointed advocates by at least 75%.
The Bar Council backed the government’s plan to restructure payments to Crown court advocates while the Law Society warned it will cause bankruptcies, market failure and advice deserts.
Responding to the Ministry of Justice’s consultation, Reforming the Advocates’ Graduated Fee Scheme (AGFS), the Bar Council said it ‘supports’ the new structure, which will introduce a categorised system for payments rather than relying on the number of pages of prosecution evidence, and increase QCs’ fees by 10%.
But, it criticised the ‘inadequate’ rates and warned that years of falling fees had created an ‘unsustainable situation’ that ‘needs urgently rectifying’.
Many chambers, it said, had calculated that the changes will result in cuts to their income. It suggested running the old and new scheme in parallel for six to 12 months and called for ongoing reviews and adjustments.
The Bar Council also proposed index-linking payments to prevent future erosion by inflation and called for the Litigators’ Graduated Fee Scheme (LGFS) to be ‘rebalanced’ to reward litigators properly for case preparation.
But, in its response, the Law Society said the changes would make junior barristers and solicitor advocates ‘considerably worse off’ and warned they will cause firms to ‘go bankrupt, risking localised market failure and advice deserts, and jeopardising the administration of justice’.
Meanwhile, solicitors threatened strike action in protest over planned cuts to the LGFS that will reduce payments for preparation and slash the fees paid to court-appointed advocates by at least 75%.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
