*/
Ethics Committee
This workshop consisted of excellent discussions between panel and delegates of issues which barristers of all ages might well encounter. The panel made clear the committee’s remit. It offers ethical but not legal advice; the task of the confidential advice hotline is to take the enquiring barrister through the core values in the Handbook. However, it is instructed counsel who has to make the judgment call and to bear the responsibility. It is they who hold the brief and know the lay client.
There was advice on how to protect counsel’s position: get the brief endorsed, show you have thought about the issue, and send confirming emails if you have consulted the Bar Council hotline and/or spoken to a senior member of chambers. ‘At base we are not the mere mouthpieces of our clients,’ Fenner pointed out. So it is best to explain counsel’s role to the lay client at the very start.
Delegates were supplied with a list of ethical issues. Resolving them can be balancing exercises and unsurprisingly not everyone agreed on the ‘answer’. One problem dealt with the situation where the Crown has told the court that the defendant has no relevant convictions although defence counsel knows that the defendant is in fact subject to a suspended sentence. It was suggested that one should say to the defendant, ‘the best I can do is to stand up and say I offer no mitigation, but if I’m asked by the judge, I’ve got to tell the truth’.
Other issues concerned disclosure of one’s previous involvement with the litigants on the other side (for example having once represented a company which your client is now suing) and how to deal with the more robust allegations which a client may want you to put to the other side’s witness.
The prime duty remains a barrister’s duty to the court in the administration of justice. As Fenner put it, ‘either you stand up and perform as a barrister or you don’t – not with a nudge or a wink’.
The conference later learned of the launch of the new Ethics and Practice Hub, which will be available on phones and tablets, and which provides guidance on ethical issues, as well as guidance on IT, equality and diversity and other practice issues: barcouncilethics.co.uk.
This workshop consisted of excellent discussions between panel and delegates of issues which barristers of all ages might well encounter. The panel made clear the committee’s remit. It offers ethical but not legal advice; the task of the confidential advice hotline is to take the enquiring barrister through the core values in the Handbook. However, it is instructed counsel who has to make the judgment call and to bear the responsibility. It is they who hold the brief and know the lay client.
There was advice on how to protect counsel’s position: get the brief endorsed, show you have thought about the issue, and send confirming emails if you have consulted the Bar Council hotline and/or spoken to a senior member of chambers. ‘At base we are not the mere mouthpieces of our clients,’ Fenner pointed out. So it is best to explain counsel’s role to the lay client at the very start.
Delegates were supplied with a list of ethical issues. Resolving them can be balancing exercises and unsurprisingly not everyone agreed on the ‘answer’. One problem dealt with the situation where the Crown has told the court that the defendant has no relevant convictions although defence counsel knows that the defendant is in fact subject to a suspended sentence. It was suggested that one should say to the defendant, ‘the best I can do is to stand up and say I offer no mitigation, but if I’m asked by the judge, I’ve got to tell the truth’.
Other issues concerned disclosure of one’s previous involvement with the litigants on the other side (for example having once represented a company which your client is now suing) and how to deal with the more robust allegations which a client may want you to put to the other side’s witness.
The prime duty remains a barrister’s duty to the court in the administration of justice. As Fenner put it, ‘either you stand up and perform as a barrister or you don’t – not with a nudge or a wink’.
The conference later learned of the launch of the new Ethics and Practice Hub, which will be available on phones and tablets, and which provides guidance on ethical issues, as well as guidance on IT, equality and diversity and other practice issues: barcouncilethics.co.uk.
Ethics Committee
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
National courts are now running the bulk of the world’s war crimes cases and corporate prosecutions are part of this growing trend, reports Chris Stephen