*/
How can we reach the destination of neurodiversity and neuroinclusivity if, even with a road map, we don’t know where we are starting from? Danielle Gleicher-Bates, Chair and Co-Founder of neurodiversikey®, introduces the surveys aiming to plug the knowledge gap and employ the results as a catalyst for change
neurodiversikey® is conducting two unprecedented surveys open to neurodivergent law students and legal professionals respectively. The surveys explore the experiences, perceptions, and self-identification of neurodivergent individuals in legal education, training, and practice, with the aim of inspiring action to foster neurodiversity and neuroinclusivity.
We are seeking participants to answer 15-16 multiple choice questions anonymously. We need as many neurodivergent voices (including self-diagnosed) as possible to ensure the neurodivergent community is heard and to bring about change. If you are an ally to the community you can assist by sharing the surveys with your network. Whether you are neurodivergent or an ally, this is your opportunity to help shape the future for neurodivergent people in law.
Studying and practising law can be deeply rewarding and satisfying – but challenging too, often compounded by inequity and exclusion. Despite significant progress in diversity, equity, and inclusion across legal education, training, and practice, neurodiversity and neuroinclusion lag behind. For many neurodivergent individuals, access to, retainment, and progression within law come with additional invisible barriers.
In recent years, the legal community has become increasingly interested in neurodiversity and neuroinclusivity. However, this has yet to translate into widespread, meaningful change. In the interests of access to justice, the legal profession should be representative of society – the need for which is emphasised by the overrepresentation of neurodivergent people in for example the criminal justice system. We want legal education, training and practice to be neurodiverse and neuroinclusive.
Anecdotally, we know that neurodivergent people face inequity, exclusion and discrimination in law. Beyond anecdotal evidence, there is plenty that we simply do not know. We do not know how neuroinclusive or neurodiverse legal education, training, and practice are; to what extent neurodivergent people feel they are neuroinclusive; or even neurodivergent people’s language and identity preferences. Why don’t we know? Nobody has ever asked.
‘How can we reach the destination of neurodiversity and neuroinclusivity if, even with a road map, we don’t know where we are starting from?’
This dearth of evidence leaves law with a blind spot, and neither a yardstick with which to measure progress, nor a route to it. By carrying out these surveys, neurodiversikey® intends to start plugging the knowledge gap, and to employ the results as a catalyst for change.
Responses will be analysed to identify any key trends across neurotypes, legal education, training, and practice. We plan to publish a report of our findings as part of our series of events for Neurodiversity Celebration Week (18-24 March).
The report will be used to determine where our work is needed most, the next steps the legal community should take, and to assess long-term progress. The neurodivergent community needs action which we hope will be prompted by the findings – immediately and across the board.
Key points for participants
Danielle Gleicher-Bates is Chair and Co-Founder of award-winning non-profit neurodiversikey®, and winner of ‘DE&I Champion of the Year in a Specialist Role’ W&DIL Awards 2024.
neurodiversikey® is conducting two unprecedented surveys open to neurodivergent law students and legal professionals respectively. The surveys explore the experiences, perceptions, and self-identification of neurodivergent individuals in legal education, training, and practice, with the aim of inspiring action to foster neurodiversity and neuroinclusivity.
We are seeking participants to answer 15-16 multiple choice questions anonymously. We need as many neurodivergent voices (including self-diagnosed) as possible to ensure the neurodivergent community is heard and to bring about change. If you are an ally to the community you can assist by sharing the surveys with your network. Whether you are neurodivergent or an ally, this is your opportunity to help shape the future for neurodivergent people in law.
Studying and practising law can be deeply rewarding and satisfying – but challenging too, often compounded by inequity and exclusion. Despite significant progress in diversity, equity, and inclusion across legal education, training, and practice, neurodiversity and neuroinclusion lag behind. For many neurodivergent individuals, access to, retainment, and progression within law come with additional invisible barriers.
In recent years, the legal community has become increasingly interested in neurodiversity and neuroinclusivity. However, this has yet to translate into widespread, meaningful change. In the interests of access to justice, the legal profession should be representative of society – the need for which is emphasised by the overrepresentation of neurodivergent people in for example the criminal justice system. We want legal education, training and practice to be neurodiverse and neuroinclusive.
Anecdotally, we know that neurodivergent people face inequity, exclusion and discrimination in law. Beyond anecdotal evidence, there is plenty that we simply do not know. We do not know how neuroinclusive or neurodiverse legal education, training, and practice are; to what extent neurodivergent people feel they are neuroinclusive; or even neurodivergent people’s language and identity preferences. Why don’t we know? Nobody has ever asked.
‘How can we reach the destination of neurodiversity and neuroinclusivity if, even with a road map, we don’t know where we are starting from?’
This dearth of evidence leaves law with a blind spot, and neither a yardstick with which to measure progress, nor a route to it. By carrying out these surveys, neurodiversikey® intends to start plugging the knowledge gap, and to employ the results as a catalyst for change.
Responses will be analysed to identify any key trends across neurotypes, legal education, training, and practice. We plan to publish a report of our findings as part of our series of events for Neurodiversity Celebration Week (18-24 March).
The report will be used to determine where our work is needed most, the next steps the legal community should take, and to assess long-term progress. The neurodivergent community needs action which we hope will be prompted by the findings – immediately and across the board.
Key points for participants
How can we reach the destination of neurodiversity and neuroinclusivity if, even with a road map, we don’t know where we are starting from? Danielle Gleicher-Bates, Chair and Co-Founder of neurodiversikey®, introduces the surveys aiming to plug the knowledge gap and employ the results as a catalyst for change
Far-ranging month for the Chair of the Bar
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the most recent data on alcohol misuse in the UK, and the implications for alcohol testing in family proceedings
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how tailored financial planning can help barristers take control of their finances and plan with confidence
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
In this wide-ranging interview, Professor Jo Delahunty KC, Family Law KC of the Year, talks to Anthony Inglese CB about the values that shaped her, the moment she found her vocation and, in an intensely personal call to arms, why time is running out for the legal aid Bar
Is the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office process fit for purpose? Women barristers’ experiences of bullying are not being reported or, if they are, they are not making it through the system, says Tana Adkin KC
Review by Daniel Barnett
Chair of the Bar reports back
The client’s best interests could be well-served by sharing the advocacy with junior counsel more often than you might think – Naomi Cunningham and Charlotte Eves explore some less orthodox ways to divide the speaking role
