*/
The government has published proposals to loosen the ‘onerous and prescriptive’ rules for new legal businesses.
Announcing the consultation, Legal Services: Removing the barriers to competition, justice minister Lord Faulks said that since their introduction in the Legal Services Act 2007, contrary to the fears of many, alternative business structures (ABSs) ‘have not been shown to attract any greater regulatory risk than traditional law firms’.
Since 2010, when ABSs were first licensed, more than 600 have been formed.
Faulks said that their introduction, particularly those that have access to external investment and business and commercial expertise, has benefited the market more widely.
‘These new, innovative providers have increased competition in the market, which we believe encourages the market to provide a wider variety of legal services that are more accessible and affordable to consumers,’ he said.
As a result of concerns raised at the time about the potential risks of these ‘new and unknown business models’, Faulks said the legislative framework for ABS regulation is more ‘onerous and prescriptive’ than for traditional law firms, which acts as a ‘deterrent and an unnecessary barrier’ to firms wanting to innovate or enter the market.
‘The proposals set out in this consultation aim to enable legal services regulators to reduce regulatory burdens on ABSs, while taking a more effective risk-based approach to regulation,’ he said.
Meanwhile, in its interim report on legal services, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) provisionally found that, despite some positive developments, such as the increased use of fixed fees and more commoditised services, competition in legal services for individual and small business consumers is ‘not working as well as it might’.
It suggested that competition is hampered by a lack of upfront information about price and quality.
The CMA noted the ‘complexity’ of the current regulatory framework, but said that it does not create ‘significant’ barriers to entry or distort competition.
It said that it is ‘open to more fundamental change’ of the legal regulatory regime, but doing so risked increased regulation, cost and uncertainty.
The Bar Council and Bar Standards Board welcomed the report and said they would engage with each other and the CMA to consider ways in which information about the services provided by the Bar might be improved for the benefit of consumers.
Bar Chairman, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC said: ‘It is important that the market for legal services functions efficiently, in the interests of access to justice, and in a way which ensures that consumers’ needs are met.’
The government has published proposals to loosen the ‘onerous and prescriptive’ rules for new legal businesses.
Announcing the consultation, Legal Services: Removing the barriers to competition, justice minister Lord Faulks said that since their introduction in the Legal Services Act 2007, contrary to the fears of many, alternative business structures (ABSs) ‘have not been shown to attract any greater regulatory risk than traditional law firms’.
Since 2010, when ABSs were first licensed, more than 600 have been formed.
Faulks said that their introduction, particularly those that have access to external investment and business and commercial expertise, has benefited the market more widely.
‘These new, innovative providers have increased competition in the market, which we believe encourages the market to provide a wider variety of legal services that are more accessible and affordable to consumers,’ he said.
As a result of concerns raised at the time about the potential risks of these ‘new and unknown business models’, Faulks said the legislative framework for ABS regulation is more ‘onerous and prescriptive’ than for traditional law firms, which acts as a ‘deterrent and an unnecessary barrier’ to firms wanting to innovate or enter the market.
‘The proposals set out in this consultation aim to enable legal services regulators to reduce regulatory burdens on ABSs, while taking a more effective risk-based approach to regulation,’ he said.
Meanwhile, in its interim report on legal services, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) provisionally found that, despite some positive developments, such as the increased use of fixed fees and more commoditised services, competition in legal services for individual and small business consumers is ‘not working as well as it might’.
It suggested that competition is hampered by a lack of upfront information about price and quality.
The CMA noted the ‘complexity’ of the current regulatory framework, but said that it does not create ‘significant’ barriers to entry or distort competition.
It said that it is ‘open to more fundamental change’ of the legal regulatory regime, but doing so risked increased regulation, cost and uncertainty.
The Bar Council and Bar Standards Board welcomed the report and said they would engage with each other and the CMA to consider ways in which information about the services provided by the Bar might be improved for the benefit of consumers.
Bar Chairman, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC said: ‘It is important that the market for legal services functions efficiently, in the interests of access to justice, and in a way which ensures that consumers’ needs are met.’
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
In this wide-ranging interview, Professor Jo Delahunty KC, Family Law KC of the Year, talks to Anthony Inglese CB about the values that shaped her, the moment she found her vocation and, in an intensely personal call to arms, why time is running out for the legal aid Bar
Is the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office process fit for purpose? Women barristers’ experiences of bullying are not being reported or, if they are, they are not making it through the system, says Tana Adkin KC
Thomas Roe KC and Andrew O’Kola respond to an article by Dr Leonardo Raznovich (Counsel , October 2025) – ‘Privy Council colonialism? Piercing the constitutional veil’
Chair of the Bar reports back
The client’s best interests could be well-served by sharing the advocacy with junior counsel more often than you might think – Naomi Cunningham and Charlotte Eves explore some less orthodox ways to divide the speaking role
