*/
A rush to slash legal aid fees will cause damage to the quality of justice, barristers have warned Ministers. A raft of submissions from the Bar Council, the Criminal Bar Association (CBA), young barristers and the Bar's regional circuits are unanimous in criticising proposals by the Ministry of Justice for cuts in criminal legal aid.
The Government wants to cut pay for barristers doing publiclyfunded criminal defence work by up to 23%. They propose to reverse the 2007 implementation of a review of legal aid by Lord Carter of Coles which was designed to head off a crisis in the criminal justice system triggered by a 10-year pay freeze for barristers. The Bar Council and CBA today voice grave concerns about the impact of the cuts on the diversity of the Bar and the Judiciary, and the potential risk of miscarriages of justice which cause needless cost to the public purse.
Commenting on the Bar Council’s response, Desmond Browne QC, the Chairman of the Bar said:
"Our submissions emphasise the potentially huge impact of these proposed cuts on access to justice and the diversity of the profession. No account has been taken of the likely consequences in other areas of public expenditure. Ministers will be failing in their duty without a full investigation of their proposals including the impact on Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) practitioners”.
He added:
"These cuts risk creating a two-tier legal system in which only those with private funds can afford proper representation. Such a situation cannot be allowed to develop. We urge the Government to reconsider their proposals before it is too late."
Commenting on the Bar Council’s response, Desmond Browne QC, the Chairman of the Bar said:
"Our submissions emphasise the potentially huge impact of these proposed cuts on access to justice and the diversity of the profession. No account has been taken of the likely consequences in other areas of public expenditure. Ministers will be failing in their duty without a full investigation of their proposals including the impact on Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) practitioners”.
He added:
"These cuts risk creating a two-tier legal system in which only those with private funds can afford proper representation. Such a situation cannot be allowed to develop. We urge the Government to reconsider their proposals before it is too late."
A rush to slash legal aid fees will cause damage to the quality of justice, barristers have warned Ministers. A raft of submissions from the Bar Council, the Criminal Bar Association (CBA), young barristers and the Bar's regional circuits are unanimous in criticising proposals by the Ministry of Justice for cuts in criminal legal aid.
The Government wants to cut pay for barristers doing publiclyfunded criminal defence work by up to 23%. They propose to reverse the 2007 implementation of a review of legal aid by Lord Carter of Coles which was designed to head off a crisis in the criminal justice system triggered by a 10-year pay freeze for barristers. The Bar Council and CBA today voice grave concerns about the impact of the cuts on the diversity of the Bar and the Judiciary, and the potential risk of miscarriages of justice which cause needless cost to the public purse.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
