*/
Profession
The actor Martin Shaw denounced the prospect of industrial-scale legal practices when delivering the 2012 Kalisher Lecture. An Honorary Bencher of Gray’s Inn and a Kalisher trustee, he described himself as an “informed outsider” who has grown to respect and admire the legal profession “more than I had ever imagined possible”. In addition, he has a daughter beginning the “long and arduous road” into the profession.
Addressing barristers, the senior judiciary, and law students, he was unsparing in his analysis of proposed changes to the structure of the publicly funded Bar. He described a future in which talented candidates from diverse backgrounds no longer aspire to become criminal barristers. They dare not risk the inevitable level of debt in the context of a shrinking profession which will leave even the brightest and best with little prospect of a tenancy.
Mr Shaw set out the challenges: public ignorance and apathy about the fate of the criminal Bar, swingeing cuts to legal aid imposed by two successive Governments, and rising tuition fees - more than £60,000 of debt on entry to the profession is not remarkable. He drew parallels to television drama: when the BBC has to enter a ratings war, it is more likely to produce ‘X Factor’ than Shakespeare. Similarly, a bulk legal service will replace a personal one. “Never mind the lament for the high street butcher, cheesemonger, baker, ironmonger. You’ll struggle to find a high street solicitor before long.”
Articulating his fear that the ‘Bar is in very real danger’, Mr Shaw emphasised the importance of the criminal barrister: an independent specialist whose overriding responsibility is to see justice done. Deregulation would lead to “a no-frills, cheap and cheerful bulk legal service. Tesco Law, Asda Legal, and, for the cachet of a Silk, Waitrose Lex.” His view is that excellence produces justice. Bulk commerce on the other hand trades in adequacy.
Mr Shaw called on the Government to “pull back from proposals which will so erode the Bar as to destroy it.” This is a small profession of highly trained experts, providing the public with a service it deserves and upon which it relies without a moment’s thought.Drawing an analogy with medicine, he said: “When I go into hospital I want someone trained and practising for years. And when I’m having my hip replaced, I don’t want it done by a dentist.”
He considers criminal law stratified, difficult, ever-expanding, hard to master and very hard to keep abreast of. In-house advocacy will not be cheaper and just as good. Things will go wrong, and the Court of Appeal is an expensive place.
Addressing barristers, the senior judiciary, and law students, he was unsparing in his analysis of proposed changes to the structure of the publicly funded Bar. He described a future in which talented candidates from diverse backgrounds no longer aspire to become criminal barristers. They dare not risk the inevitable level of debt in the context of a shrinking profession which will leave even the brightest and best with little prospect of a tenancy.
Mr Shaw set out the challenges: public ignorance and apathy about the fate of the criminal Bar, swingeing cuts to legal aid imposed by two successive Governments, and rising tuition fees - more than £60,000 of debt on entry to the profession is not remarkable. He drew parallels to television drama: when the BBC has to enter a ratings war, it is more likely to produce ‘X Factor’ than Shakespeare. Similarly, a bulk legal service will replace a personal one. “Never mind the lament for the high street butcher, cheesemonger, baker, ironmonger. You’ll struggle to find a high street solicitor before long.”
Articulating his fear that the ‘Bar is in very real danger’, Mr Shaw emphasised the importance of the criminal barrister: an independent specialist whose overriding responsibility is to see justice done. Deregulation would lead to “a no-frills, cheap and cheerful bulk legal service. Tesco Law, Asda Legal, and, for the cachet of a Silk, Waitrose Lex.” His view is that excellence produces justice. Bulk commerce on the other hand trades in adequacy.
Mr Shaw called on the Government to “pull back from proposals which will so erode the Bar as to destroy it.” This is a small profession of highly trained experts, providing the public with a service it deserves and upon which it relies without a moment’s thought.Drawing an analogy with medicine, he said: “When I go into hospital I want someone trained and practising for years. And when I’m having my hip replaced, I don’t want it done by a dentist.”
He considers criminal law stratified, difficult, ever-expanding, hard to master and very hard to keep abreast of. In-house advocacy will not be cheaper and just as good. Things will go wrong, and the Court of Appeal is an expensive place.
Profession
The actor Martin Shaw denounced the prospect of industrial-scale legal practices when delivering the 2012 Kalisher Lecture. An Honorary Bencher of Gray’s Inn and a Kalisher trustee, he described himself as an “informed outsider” who has grown to respect and admire the legal profession “more than I had ever imagined possible”. In addition, he has a daughter beginning the “long and arduous road” into the profession.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Animal sexual abuse is a distressing and taboo subject. Yet, write Christina Warner and Maya Badham, this hidden crisis, where legal, ethical and psychological factors converge, requires frank discussion
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
