*/
Profession
The actor Martin Shaw denounced the prospect of industrial-scale legal practices when delivering the 2012 Kalisher Lecture. An Honorary Bencher of Gray’s Inn and a Kalisher trustee, he described himself as an “informed outsider” who has grown to respect and admire the legal profession “more than I had ever imagined possible”. In addition, he has a daughter beginning the “long and arduous road” into the profession.
Addressing barristers, the senior judiciary, and law students, he was unsparing in his analysis of proposed changes to the structure of the publicly funded Bar. He described a future in which talented candidates from diverse backgrounds no longer aspire to become criminal barristers. They dare not risk the inevitable level of debt in the context of a shrinking profession which will leave even the brightest and best with little prospect of a tenancy.
Mr Shaw set out the challenges: public ignorance and apathy about the fate of the criminal Bar, swingeing cuts to legal aid imposed by two successive Governments, and rising tuition fees - more than £60,000 of debt on entry to the profession is not remarkable. He drew parallels to television drama: when the BBC has to enter a ratings war, it is more likely to produce ‘X Factor’ than Shakespeare. Similarly, a bulk legal service will replace a personal one. “Never mind the lament for the high street butcher, cheesemonger, baker, ironmonger. You’ll struggle to find a high street solicitor before long.”
Articulating his fear that the ‘Bar is in very real danger’, Mr Shaw emphasised the importance of the criminal barrister: an independent specialist whose overriding responsibility is to see justice done. Deregulation would lead to “a no-frills, cheap and cheerful bulk legal service. Tesco Law, Asda Legal, and, for the cachet of a Silk, Waitrose Lex.” His view is that excellence produces justice. Bulk commerce on the other hand trades in adequacy.
Mr Shaw called on the Government to “pull back from proposals which will so erode the Bar as to destroy it.” This is a small profession of highly trained experts, providing the public with a service it deserves and upon which it relies without a moment’s thought.Drawing an analogy with medicine, he said: “When I go into hospital I want someone trained and practising for years. And when I’m having my hip replaced, I don’t want it done by a dentist.”
He considers criminal law stratified, difficult, ever-expanding, hard to master and very hard to keep abreast of. In-house advocacy will not be cheaper and just as good. Things will go wrong, and the Court of Appeal is an expensive place.
Addressing barristers, the senior judiciary, and law students, he was unsparing in his analysis of proposed changes to the structure of the publicly funded Bar. He described a future in which talented candidates from diverse backgrounds no longer aspire to become criminal barristers. They dare not risk the inevitable level of debt in the context of a shrinking profession which will leave even the brightest and best with little prospect of a tenancy.
Mr Shaw set out the challenges: public ignorance and apathy about the fate of the criminal Bar, swingeing cuts to legal aid imposed by two successive Governments, and rising tuition fees - more than £60,000 of debt on entry to the profession is not remarkable. He drew parallels to television drama: when the BBC has to enter a ratings war, it is more likely to produce ‘X Factor’ than Shakespeare. Similarly, a bulk legal service will replace a personal one. “Never mind the lament for the high street butcher, cheesemonger, baker, ironmonger. You’ll struggle to find a high street solicitor before long.”
Articulating his fear that the ‘Bar is in very real danger’, Mr Shaw emphasised the importance of the criminal barrister: an independent specialist whose overriding responsibility is to see justice done. Deregulation would lead to “a no-frills, cheap and cheerful bulk legal service. Tesco Law, Asda Legal, and, for the cachet of a Silk, Waitrose Lex.” His view is that excellence produces justice. Bulk commerce on the other hand trades in adequacy.
Mr Shaw called on the Government to “pull back from proposals which will so erode the Bar as to destroy it.” This is a small profession of highly trained experts, providing the public with a service it deserves and upon which it relies without a moment’s thought.Drawing an analogy with medicine, he said: “When I go into hospital I want someone trained and practising for years. And when I’m having my hip replaced, I don’t want it done by a dentist.”
He considers criminal law stratified, difficult, ever-expanding, hard to master and very hard to keep abreast of. In-house advocacy will not be cheaper and just as good. Things will go wrong, and the Court of Appeal is an expensive place.
Profession
The actor Martin Shaw denounced the prospect of industrial-scale legal practices when delivering the 2012 Kalisher Lecture. An Honorary Bencher of Gray’s Inn and a Kalisher trustee, he described himself as an “informed outsider” who has grown to respect and admire the legal profession “more than I had ever imagined possible”. In addition, he has a daughter beginning the “long and arduous road” into the profession.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
