*/
Profession
The Supreme Court has ruled against extending legal professional privilege (LPP) to non-lawyers, following a case put forward by financial services group Prudential, requesting its extension to protect advice given by accountants.
In R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) (Appellants) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another (Respondents) [2013] UKSC 1, the majority (5:2) held that LPP should not be extended to communications in connection with advice given by professional people other than lawyers, even where that advice is legal advice.
Extending LPP would bring uncertainty to a clear and well understood principle and raise questions of policy which should be left to Parliament, the judges said.
The Bar Council intervened in the case, represented on a pro bono basis by Field Fisher Waterhouse, and counsel Bankim Thanki QC, Ben Valentine and Henry King. The Bar Council argued that extending LPP would undermine the necessary absolute confidentiality agreement between lawyers and clients, create uncertainty around the established scope of LPP, and constitute a significant inroad into the principle, necessary for the sound administration of justice, that relevant material should be placed before the court.
In R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) (Appellants) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another (Respondents) [2013] UKSC 1, the majority (5:2) held that LPP should not be extended to communications in connection with advice given by professional people other than lawyers, even where that advice is legal advice.
Extending LPP would bring uncertainty to a clear and well understood principle and raise questions of policy which should be left to Parliament, the judges said.
The Bar Council intervened in the case, represented on a pro bono basis by Field Fisher Waterhouse, and counsel Bankim Thanki QC, Ben Valentine and Henry King. The Bar Council argued that extending LPP would undermine the necessary absolute confidentiality agreement between lawyers and clients, create uncertainty around the established scope of LPP, and constitute a significant inroad into the principle, necessary for the sound administration of justice, that relevant material should be placed before the court.
Profession
The Supreme Court has ruled against extending legal professional privilege (LPP) to non-lawyers, following a case put forward by financial services group Prudential, requesting its extension to protect advice given by accountants.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
In an era of patient-centred care and growing concern over misconduct in medical settings, why do women still lack the right to choose women consultants for examination and treatment? Charles Davey investigates
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
