*/
Calls for Royal Commission to examine consitutional framework
It is time for a close look at the British constitution, the Master of the Rolls has said.
In a speech to the Law Commission in December, “Law reform—where will it all end?”, Lord Neuberger encouraged the Commissioners to make constitutional law their next subject of examination. This could be done by a special Commission or Royal Commission, he said.
This did not mean he advocated a written constitution, he said, but that the existing unwritten constitution was undergoing a period of change.
Further reform of the House of Lords is a “live issue”, he said, “not least in the light of its ever increasing size at a time when the smaller House of Commons is apparently engaged on down-sizing”.
Referring to the Hunting Act case, R (Jackson) v HM Attorney-General, he said: “The dicta in Jackson indicate that there is a strong judicial view that an important aspect of our fundamental law is changing; that parliamentary supremacy may be eroding ... But that raises the question, if Parliament is not sovereign, what is?”
Given the rate of constitutional evolution, he said, it had “become increasingly imperative that we engage a Royal Commission to examine our constitutional framework. Constitutional clarity is of fundamental importance”.
In a speech to the Law Commission in December, “Law reform—where will it all end?”, Lord Neuberger encouraged the Commissioners to make constitutional law their next subject of examination. This could be done by a special Commission or Royal Commission, he said.
This did not mean he advocated a written constitution, he said, but that the existing unwritten constitution was undergoing a period of change.
Further reform of the House of Lords is a “live issue”, he said, “not least in the light of its ever increasing size at a time when the smaller House of Commons is apparently engaged on down-sizing”.
Referring to the Hunting Act case, R (Jackson) v HM Attorney-General, he said: “The dicta in Jackson indicate that there is a strong judicial view that an important aspect of our fundamental law is changing; that parliamentary supremacy may be eroding ... But that raises the question, if Parliament is not sovereign, what is?”
Given the rate of constitutional evolution, he said, it had “become increasingly imperative that we engage a Royal Commission to examine our constitutional framework. Constitutional clarity is of fundamental importance”.
Calls for Royal Commission to examine consitutional framework
It is time for a close look at the British constitution, the Master of the Rolls has said.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
Responding to criticism on the narrow profile of government-instructed counsel, Mel Nebhrajani CB describes the system-wide change at GLD to drive fairer distribution of work and broader development of talent
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
