*/
Judiciary/Diversity
It will take 50 years to secure a fully diverse judiciary on merit alone, warned Lord Sumption at the Bar Council 12th Annual Law Reform Lecture (15 November 2012).
“Positive discrimination,” said the Supreme Court Justice, “is the only thing that is likely to accelerate the rate of progress significantly. It does not of course follow that positive discrimination is desirable... But it should at least be on the menu.”
Sumption, a former member of the Judicial Appointments Commission, said that the profession was deluding itself without an “honest public debate about the hitherto unmentionable subject of positive discrimination. We have to decide whether we want to accept a measure of positive discrimination in the selection of judges, as the price of making faster progress towards judicial diversity. There are arguments both for and against it. But the real problem is that the debate has not happened.”
Lord Judge, Lord Chief Justice, however, speaking at the Judge for Yourself event on 22 November, endorsed the merit-based approach to appointment: “I want the people best qualified to be judges to be appointed as judges. And only people of the necessary quality. No more, and certainly no less.”
Diversity has started its slow trickle through, according to Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) statistics released last month. A quarter of the lawyers recently recommended for appointment as 28 Deputy District Judges (Magistrates’ Courts) were black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME), and women made up 46 per cent of the selections, compared to 44 per cent of the eligible pool - a slight improvement since the 2009 exercise.
Christopher Stephens, Chairman of the JAC, said: “Selections, as always, were made solely on merit and I am delighted to see such a strong performance from BAME lawyers and continued good results for women. There is still a long way to go on judicial diversity and we hope this success is consolidated in other competitions, with the results feeding through to salaried and more senior appointments in the future.”
“Positive discrimination,” said the Supreme Court Justice, “is the only thing that is likely to accelerate the rate of progress significantly. It does not of course follow that positive discrimination is desirable... But it should at least be on the menu.”
Sumption, a former member of the Judicial Appointments Commission, said that the profession was deluding itself without an “honest public debate about the hitherto unmentionable subject of positive discrimination. We have to decide whether we want to accept a measure of positive discrimination in the selection of judges, as the price of making faster progress towards judicial diversity. There are arguments both for and against it. But the real problem is that the debate has not happened.”
Lord Judge, Lord Chief Justice, however, speaking at the Judge for Yourself event on 22 November, endorsed the merit-based approach to appointment: “I want the people best qualified to be judges to be appointed as judges. And only people of the necessary quality. No more, and certainly no less.”
Diversity has started its slow trickle through, according to Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) statistics released last month. A quarter of the lawyers recently recommended for appointment as 28 Deputy District Judges (Magistrates’ Courts) were black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME), and women made up 46 per cent of the selections, compared to 44 per cent of the eligible pool - a slight improvement since the 2009 exercise.
Christopher Stephens, Chairman of the JAC, said: “Selections, as always, were made solely on merit and I am delighted to see such a strong performance from BAME lawyers and continued good results for women. There is still a long way to go on judicial diversity and we hope this success is consolidated in other competitions, with the results feeding through to salaried and more senior appointments in the future.”
Judiciary/Diversity
It will take 50 years to secure a fully diverse judiciary on merit alone, warned Lord Sumption at the Bar Council 12th Annual Law Reform Lecture (15 November 2012).
In this month’s column, Chair of the Bar Sam Townend KC highlights the many reasons why barristers should pay the Bar Representation Fee and back the Bar Council’s efforts on behalf of the profession
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Leading legal DNA, drug, and alcohol testing provider AlphaBiolabs has made its first Giving Back charity draw of 2024 with Andrew Sibson, a Legal Officer at Leeds City Council, being chosen as its first winner
Discover Lloyd’s unique approach to financial planning and experience working with barristers
Trust Delaunay Wealth to stand by your side amid the uncertainties ahead, writes Lloyd French
Lighting fires that cast unfairness into the shadows, creating history at home and abroad, and being comfortable with who you are – the remarkable criminal and international human rights barrister Kirsty Brimelow KC
No longer an exclusive boys’ club, but still some way to go. To mark International Women's Day, Millie Rai describes what it’s like being a young female barrister at the Commercial Chancery Bar
Marking International Women's Day, Will Tyler KC interviews two female silks at the helm of two huge specialist Bar associations about their lives and careers – finding a common theme both to their success and the challenges facing their respective Bars
If we fail to nurture women’s collective talent, half the population of this country will not be properly represented – from the junior Criminal Bar right up to the senior Judiciary. We cannot let all the hard work be undone, says Tana Adkin KC on International Women's Day
In this month’s column, Chair of the Bar Sam Townend KC highlights the many reasons why barristers should pay the Bar Representation Fee and back the Bar Council’s efforts on behalf of the profession