*/
Criminal barristers have strongly opposed a proposal from the solicitors’ regulator to lift the ban on referral fees paid for criminal legal aid cases.
Responding to the Solicitor’s Regulation Authority’s regulatory reform consultation, the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) said the payment of referral fees is “unethical” and “against the interests of vulnerable clients, the rule of law, the administration of justice and the public interest”.
It said the fees exist “solely for the benefit of solicitors” and should be “outlawed”.
According to the CBA: “Such payments have no place in publicly funded work and are an improper use of public funds: they do not represent value for money, and are not payments for legal services.
“They are contrary to the public interest, they distort the market for legal services by denying clients a free choice of representative, and they are open to abuse by solicitors who put their own financial interests above the interests of their clients.”
The association expressed concern that the SRA thought it appropriate “even to consult on this issue”. It said: “The payment of referral fees is no more than a system of buying and selling cases – and ultimately of treating clients as a tradeable commodity.”
Given the tight margins in criminal defence work, it said the “inevitable consequence” of permitting referral fees would be a reduction in the quality of the service provided. “While this might suit the commercial interests of the parties to the referral fee, such an arrangement cannot be in the interests of the public or the user of the service.”
The CBA said it is “anecdotally” aware of allegations that solicitors have demanded payments to secure instructions in better paid legal aid cases.
In the consultation, which closed in June, the SRA said it understood the issue is a “topic of concern” for many who “understandably” find referral fees “distasteful and unethical”.
But it said the criminal legal market has been in a “state of flux” with legal aid cuts, the introduction of means testing, and wider changes in the justice system that have “blurred” the roles of solicitors and barristers and altered the flow of cases.
It acknowledged allegations that referral fees are already being paid directly or indirectly in criminal work, for example, to acquire advocacy cases or to “swap” multi-handed cases.
And it accepted the “economic imperatives” for doing so, but questioned whether it is in the interests of vulnerable consumers or the rule of law.
Criminal barristers have strongly opposed a proposal from the solicitors’ regulator to lift the ban on referral fees paid for criminal legal aid cases.
Responding to the Solicitor’s Regulation Authority’s regulatory reform consultation, the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) said the payment of referral fees is “unethical” and “against the interests of vulnerable clients, the rule of law, the administration of justice and the public interest”.
It said the fees exist “solely for the benefit of solicitors” and should be “outlawed”.
According to the CBA: “Such payments have no place in publicly funded work and are an improper use of public funds: they do not represent value for money, and are not payments for legal services.
“They are contrary to the public interest, they distort the market for legal services by denying clients a free choice of representative, and they are open to abuse by solicitors who put their own financial interests above the interests of their clients.”
The association expressed concern that the SRA thought it appropriate “even to consult on this issue”. It said: “The payment of referral fees is no more than a system of buying and selling cases – and ultimately of treating clients as a tradeable commodity.”
Given the tight margins in criminal defence work, it said the “inevitable consequence” of permitting referral fees would be a reduction in the quality of the service provided. “While this might suit the commercial interests of the parties to the referral fee, such an arrangement cannot be in the interests of the public or the user of the service.”
The CBA said it is “anecdotally” aware of allegations that solicitors have demanded payments to secure instructions in better paid legal aid cases.
In the consultation, which closed in June, the SRA said it understood the issue is a “topic of concern” for many who “understandably” find referral fees “distasteful and unethical”.
But it said the criminal legal market has been in a “state of flux” with legal aid cuts, the introduction of means testing, and wider changes in the justice system that have “blurred” the roles of solicitors and barristers and altered the flow of cases.
It acknowledged allegations that referral fees are already being paid directly or indirectly in criminal work, for example, to acquire advocacy cases or to “swap” multi-handed cases.
And it accepted the “economic imperatives” for doing so, but questioned whether it is in the interests of vulnerable consumers or the rule of law.
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
The long-running fee-paid judicial pensions saga continues. The current cut-off date for giving notice of election to join FPJPS is 31 March 2024, and that date now gives rise to a serious problem, warns HH John Platt
