*/
Privacy
Amid criticisms of hijacking the Defamation Bill, the House of Lords has voted in favour of adding a last-minute “Leveson clause”, with 272 voting for, and 141 against.
The amendment to the Defamation Bill, for a Leveson-style low-cost arbitration service, was put forward by Lord Puttnam at report stage: “Lord Justice Leveson has already proposed a ready-made and carefully considered solution,” Puttnam said. “The advantage of our simple amendments is that they closely follow those recommendations…They also have the merit of showing that the arbitration service proposed by Lord Justice Leveson can be put into effect in a remarkably simple and straightforward manner.”
Speaking against attaching the amendment to a defamation Bill, was Lord Lester of Herne Hill, who also warned that the scheme would result in complex legal disputes: “The scheme envisaged by these amendments is inquisitorial and not adversarial. It is not a voluntary scheme because of the threat of exemplary damages for failure to use a recognised arbitration service. The arbitrator does not satisfy the requirements of judicial process by an independent court or tribunal established by law. The arbitrator can dispense with hearings in his or her discretion. There is no right of appeal to an independent court or tribunal and the process is free for complainants but to be paid for by the press. In my view, such a scheme would be incompatible with Articles 6 and 10 of the convention.”
The third reading – a final chance to amend the Bill – was scheduled to take place on 25 February. The amendment will then be considered by the Commons.
The amendment to the Defamation Bill, for a Leveson-style low-cost arbitration service, was put forward by Lord Puttnam at report stage: “Lord Justice Leveson has already proposed a ready-made and carefully considered solution,” Puttnam said. “The advantage of our simple amendments is that they closely follow those recommendations…They also have the merit of showing that the arbitration service proposed by Lord Justice Leveson can be put into effect in a remarkably simple and straightforward manner.”
Speaking against attaching the amendment to a defamation Bill, was Lord Lester of Herne Hill, who also warned that the scheme would result in complex legal disputes: “The scheme envisaged by these amendments is inquisitorial and not adversarial. It is not a voluntary scheme because of the threat of exemplary damages for failure to use a recognised arbitration service. The arbitrator does not satisfy the requirements of judicial process by an independent court or tribunal established by law. The arbitrator can dispense with hearings in his or her discretion. There is no right of appeal to an independent court or tribunal and the process is free for complainants but to be paid for by the press. In my view, such a scheme would be incompatible with Articles 6 and 10 of the convention.”
The third reading – a final chance to amend the Bill – was scheduled to take place on 25 February. The amendment will then be considered by the Commons.
Privacy
Amid criticisms of hijacking the Defamation Bill, the House of Lords has voted in favour of adding a last-minute “Leveson clause”, with 272 voting for, and 141 against.
The Bar Council will press for investment in justice at party conferences, the Chancellor’s Budget and Spending Review
Equip yourself for your new career at the Bar
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth explores some key steps to take when starting out as a barrister in order to secure your financial future
Millicent Wild of 5 Essex Chambers describes her pupillage experience
Drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Juno Women’s Aid in Nottingham as part of its Giving Back campaign
Casedo explains how to hit the ground running on your next case with a four-step plan to transform the way you work
In a two-part opinion series, James Onalaja considers the International Criminal Court Prosecutor’s requests for arrest warrants in the controversial Israel-Palestine situation
Christianah Babajide talks to four female senior clerks who share insights for aspiring clerks, especially women, as well as their hopes for the future of the profession
Daniel Barnett serves up a host of summer shows
Britain needs to get over its shameful denial of racism, call it what it is and start to effectively deal with the problem, says Vithyah Chelvam
An epic failure of public policy has filled our crumbling prisons to capacity, says Lord Ken Macdonald KC. How did we get here, and what might reform look like?
