*/
The Bar Council condemned the ‘remorseless succession’ of legal aid funding cuts, but said changes to advocates’ fees were a ‘step in the right direction’.
Responding to the Ministry of Justice’s announcement over the reformed advocates’ graduated fee scheme (AGFS) the Bar Chair, Andrew Walker QC, said that the ‘remorseless succession’ of cuts have caused ‘real and pressing concerns’ about the viability and sustainability of many at the criminal Bar, and about whether the Bar will be able to continue to recruit and retain the practitioners needed in the future.
But he said the changes, which increase the payments made to some advocates, represent ‘an important step in the right direction for the long-term future of the criminal Bar’.
Walker said it was reassuring to see a number of the shortcomings in the original proposals, had been addressed in the final scheme, ‘even if the gains at an individual level are modest’.
The changes to the AGFS, made in conjunction with earlier amendments to the litigators’ graduated fee scheme, which cut the fees paid to solicitors, are intended to be cost-neutral.
The Law Society said the move amounted to ‘robbing Peter to pay Paul’. It warned that ‘depriving one beleaguered portion of the criminal justice system to fund another could inflict further instability on the under-pressure system’.
Meanwhile, the Bar Council told regulators that they show their independence from government by speaking out about the impact of legal aid cuts.
Responding to the Legal Services Board’s business plan consultation, the Bar Council said the watchdog ‘should not shy away’ from criticising government policy, particularly given that one of its objectives is improving access to justice.
The Bar Council condemned the ‘remorseless succession’ of legal aid funding cuts, but said changes to advocates’ fees were a ‘step in the right direction’.
Responding to the Ministry of Justice’s announcement over the reformed advocates’ graduated fee scheme (AGFS) the Bar Chair, Andrew Walker QC, said that the ‘remorseless succession’ of cuts have caused ‘real and pressing concerns’ about the viability and sustainability of many at the criminal Bar, and about whether the Bar will be able to continue to recruit and retain the practitioners needed in the future.
But he said the changes, which increase the payments made to some advocates, represent ‘an important step in the right direction for the long-term future of the criminal Bar’.
Walker said it was reassuring to see a number of the shortcomings in the original proposals, had been addressed in the final scheme, ‘even if the gains at an individual level are modest’.
The changes to the AGFS, made in conjunction with earlier amendments to the litigators’ graduated fee scheme, which cut the fees paid to solicitors, are intended to be cost-neutral.
The Law Society said the move amounted to ‘robbing Peter to pay Paul’. It warned that ‘depriving one beleaguered portion of the criminal justice system to fund another could inflict further instability on the under-pressure system’.
Meanwhile, the Bar Council told regulators that they show their independence from government by speaking out about the impact of legal aid cuts.
Responding to the Legal Services Board’s business plan consultation, the Bar Council said the watchdog ‘should not shy away’ from criticising government policy, particularly given that one of its objectives is improving access to justice.
Politically neutral, yet loud and clear – why standing on the sidelines is not an option
With the property market witnessing significant changes since the beginning of the pandemic, Fleet Street Wealth’s Managing Director Julian Morgan considers the future of the home, the second home and the office
In partnership with the Bar Council, LexisNexis is offering up to 60% off its extensive webinar offering.
Chambers is expanding its team.
Making a move from the Bar to a career in governance: Maria Brookes outlines three good reasons to switch and how to do it
Inés Rivera explains how speech recognition can help barristers create accurate documentation faster
The barrister-author talks to Chris Henley QC about the parallels between farming and farmers, and the law and barristers, and the dilemmas of combining young children with continued practice at the Bar
Permitting vulnerable people to be heard is a difficult role, but I have so much joy from it. Mary Prior QC shares life lessons with Aadhithya Anbahan
If the Bar is complacent on the issue of race, then we will perpetuate the same racial inequities that continue to pervade our society, writes Professor Leslie Thomas QC
Tim Prudhoe's lessons learnt: as the scope increases for working overseas, here's some advice on how to build the foundations for an international practice (and not upset the local Bar)
Politically neutral, yet loud and clear why standing on the sidelines is not an option
