*/
The Bar Council condemned the ‘remorseless succession’ of legal aid funding cuts, but said changes to advocates’ fees were a ‘step in the right direction’.
Responding to the Ministry of Justice’s announcement over the reformed advocates’ graduated fee scheme (AGFS) the Bar Chair, Andrew Walker QC, said that the ‘remorseless succession’ of cuts have caused ‘real and pressing concerns’ about the viability and sustainability of many at the criminal Bar, and about whether the Bar will be able to continue to recruit and retain the practitioners needed in the future.
But he said the changes, which increase the payments made to some advocates, represent ‘an important step in the right direction for the long-term future of the criminal Bar’.
Walker said it was reassuring to see a number of the shortcomings in the original proposals, had been addressed in the final scheme, ‘even if the gains at an individual level are modest’.
The changes to the AGFS, made in conjunction with earlier amendments to the litigators’ graduated fee scheme, which cut the fees paid to solicitors, are intended to be cost-neutral.
The Law Society said the move amounted to ‘robbing Peter to pay Paul’. It warned that ‘depriving one beleaguered portion of the criminal justice system to fund another could inflict further instability on the under-pressure system’.
Meanwhile, the Bar Council told regulators that they show their independence from government by speaking out about the impact of legal aid cuts.
Responding to the Legal Services Board’s business plan consultation, the Bar Council said the watchdog ‘should not shy away’ from criticising government policy, particularly given that one of its objectives is improving access to justice.
The Bar Council condemned the ‘remorseless succession’ of legal aid funding cuts, but said changes to advocates’ fees were a ‘step in the right direction’.
Responding to the Ministry of Justice’s announcement over the reformed advocates’ graduated fee scheme (AGFS) the Bar Chair, Andrew Walker QC, said that the ‘remorseless succession’ of cuts have caused ‘real and pressing concerns’ about the viability and sustainability of many at the criminal Bar, and about whether the Bar will be able to continue to recruit and retain the practitioners needed in the future.
But he said the changes, which increase the payments made to some advocates, represent ‘an important step in the right direction for the long-term future of the criminal Bar’.
Walker said it was reassuring to see a number of the shortcomings in the original proposals, had been addressed in the final scheme, ‘even if the gains at an individual level are modest’.
The changes to the AGFS, made in conjunction with earlier amendments to the litigators’ graduated fee scheme, which cut the fees paid to solicitors, are intended to be cost-neutral.
The Law Society said the move amounted to ‘robbing Peter to pay Paul’. It warned that ‘depriving one beleaguered portion of the criminal justice system to fund another could inflict further instability on the under-pressure system’.
Meanwhile, the Bar Council told regulators that they show their independence from government by speaking out about the impact of legal aid cuts.
Responding to the Legal Services Board’s business plan consultation, the Bar Council said the watchdog ‘should not shy away’ from criticising government policy, particularly given that one of its objectives is improving access to justice.
As we look ahead to Justice Week 2022, the sustainability of the Criminal Bar remains a critical issue for the government to address
Opportunity for female sopranos/contraltos in secondary education, or who have recently finished secondary education but have not yet begun tertiary education. Eligibility includes children of members of the Bar
Fear of the collection and test process is a common factor among clients, especially among vulnerable adults in complex family law cases. Cansford Laboratories shares some tips to help the testing process run as smoothly as possible
Casey Randall explains how complex relationship DNA tests can best be used – and interpreted – by counsel
Casey Randall, Head of DNA at AlphaBiolabs, explores what barristers need to know about DNA testing for immigration, including when a client might wish to submit DNA evidence, and which relationship tests are best for immigration applications
Julian Morgan reminds barristers of the top five areas to consider before 5 April
The case ofR v Brecanihas complicated matters for defence lawyers. Emma Fielding talks to gang culture expert, Dr Simon Harding about County Lines, exploitation and modern slavery
Barristers are particularly at risk of burnout because of the nature of our work and our approach to it but it doesnt have to be this way. Jade Bucklow explores how culture, work and lifestyle changes can rejuvinate our mental health...
The Schools Consent Project (SCP) is educating tens of thousands of teenagers about the law around consent to challenge and change what is now endemic behaviour. Here, its founder, barrister Kate Parker talks to Chris Henley QC about SCPs work and its association with Jodie Comers West End playPrima Facie, in which she plays a criminal barrister who is sexually assaulted
Professionally embarrassed? The circumstances in which criminal barristers may return instructions to appear at trial have become clearer following the Court of Appeal judgment inR v Daniels By Abigail Bright
Following the launch of the Life at the Young Bar report and a nationwide listening exercise, Michael Polak and Michael Harwood outline the Young Barristers Committees raft of initiatives designed to address your issues of concern
