*/
The Bar Council was among surveillance campaigners who challenged MPs to boost safety and confidentiality measures in the controversial Investigatory Powers Bill.
Together with the Law Society and the National Union of Journalists it launched the ‘Speak in Safety’ campaign.
The groups warned that the Bill jeopardises a client’s right to speak to their lawyer in confidence and threatens the anonymity of journalists’ sources and whistleblowers. They called on parliamentarians to amend the Bill dubbed the ‘snoopers’ charter’.
The Bar Council also encouraged its members to write to their MPs to alert them to their concerns over the Bill.
Bar Chairman Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC said: ‘We know that government agencies have in the past improperly eavesdropped on communications between litigants and their legal advisers.
‘Clients who cannot be sure that conversations with their legal representative are held in confidence often fail to communicate information which is vital to their case, thus compromising their right to a fair hearing.’
She said: ‘One of the essential rights in a democracy is that of a citizen to consult with a lawyer.’
And added: ‘Legal professional privilege is not the right of lawyers; privilege is the right of the client. Failure to protect that privilege amounts to a significant derogation of a fundamental constitutional right which is part of the foundation of the rule of law.’
The Bar Council was among surveillance campaigners who challenged MPs to boost safety and confidentiality measures in the controversial Investigatory Powers Bill.
Together with the Law Society and the National Union of Journalists it launched the ‘Speak in Safety’ campaign.
The groups warned that the Bill jeopardises a client’s right to speak to their lawyer in confidence and threatens the anonymity of journalists’ sources and whistleblowers. They called on parliamentarians to amend the Bill dubbed the ‘snoopers’ charter’.
The Bar Council also encouraged its members to write to their MPs to alert them to their concerns over the Bill.
Bar Chairman Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC said: ‘We know that government agencies have in the past improperly eavesdropped on communications between litigants and their legal advisers.
‘Clients who cannot be sure that conversations with their legal representative are held in confidence often fail to communicate information which is vital to their case, thus compromising their right to a fair hearing.’
She said: ‘One of the essential rights in a democracy is that of a citizen to consult with a lawyer.’
And added: ‘Legal professional privilege is not the right of lawyers; privilege is the right of the client. Failure to protect that privilege amounts to a significant derogation of a fundamental constitutional right which is part of the foundation of the rule of law.’
The Chair of the Bar reports back
By Kem Kemal, CEO, Henry Dannell
By BSK Financial Planning
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Kick off your career at the Bar Council’s Pupillage Fair this October – it’s one of the most valuable opportunities for aspiring barristers, says Amelia Clegg
Join us on Saturday 21 November 2026 at Leeds Beckett University and see for yourself why the North continues to be an exceptional place to build a career at the Bar
The golden age of advocacy? David Langwallner pays homage to the filmic if contentious barrister Sir Edward Carson and some of his contemporaries
Henry Fingerhut outlines what the Bar Standards Board AI guidance means for early career barristers
Not yet, says Jacob Turner. Regulation, unlike the technology itself, is a domain the legal profession can still control
