*/
The Bar Council was among surveillance campaigners who challenged MPs to boost safety and confidentiality measures in the controversial Investigatory Powers Bill.
Together with the Law Society and the National Union of Journalists it launched the ‘Speak in Safety’ campaign.
The groups warned that the Bill jeopardises a client’s right to speak to their lawyer in confidence and threatens the anonymity of journalists’ sources and whistleblowers. They called on parliamentarians to amend the Bill dubbed the ‘snoopers’ charter’.
The Bar Council also encouraged its members to write to their MPs to alert them to their concerns over the Bill.
Bar Chairman Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC said: ‘We know that government agencies have in the past improperly eavesdropped on communications between litigants and their legal advisers.
‘Clients who cannot be sure that conversations with their legal representative are held in confidence often fail to communicate information which is vital to their case, thus compromising their right to a fair hearing.’
She said: ‘One of the essential rights in a democracy is that of a citizen to consult with a lawyer.’
And added: ‘Legal professional privilege is not the right of lawyers; privilege is the right of the client. Failure to protect that privilege amounts to a significant derogation of a fundamental constitutional right which is part of the foundation of the rule of law.’
The Bar Council was among surveillance campaigners who challenged MPs to boost safety and confidentiality measures in the controversial Investigatory Powers Bill.
Together with the Law Society and the National Union of Journalists it launched the ‘Speak in Safety’ campaign.
The groups warned that the Bill jeopardises a client’s right to speak to their lawyer in confidence and threatens the anonymity of journalists’ sources and whistleblowers. They called on parliamentarians to amend the Bill dubbed the ‘snoopers’ charter’.
The Bar Council also encouraged its members to write to their MPs to alert them to their concerns over the Bill.
Bar Chairman Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC said: ‘We know that government agencies have in the past improperly eavesdropped on communications between litigants and their legal advisers.
‘Clients who cannot be sure that conversations with their legal representative are held in confidence often fail to communicate information which is vital to their case, thus compromising their right to a fair hearing.’
She said: ‘One of the essential rights in a democracy is that of a citizen to consult with a lawyer.’
And added: ‘Legal professional privilege is not the right of lawyers; privilege is the right of the client. Failure to protect that privilege amounts to a significant derogation of a fundamental constitutional right which is part of the foundation of the rule of law.’
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
AlphaBiolabs has donated £500 to The Christie Charity through its Giving Back initiative, helping to support cancer care, treatment and research across Greater Manchester, Cheshire and further afield
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
Are you ready for the new way to do tax returns? David Southern KC explains the biggest change since HMRC launched self-assessment more than 30 years ago... and its impact on the Bar
Professor Dominic Regan and Seán Jones KC present their best buys for this holiday season
Marking one year since a Bar disciplinary tribunal dismissed all charges against her, Dr Charlotte Proudman discusses the experience, her formative years and next steps. Interview by Anthony Inglese CB
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Pointillism, radical politics and social conscience. Review by Stephen Cragg KC
