*/
Now a settled event, we’re looking ahead to New Zealand 2020. Meanwhile Sri Lanka in 2017 saw the usual format of two pools of six teams, reports James Cartwright
The Bar of England and Wales Cricket Club (BEWCC) began with enormous enthusiasm. First a demolition of Bangladesh (Dan Burton 5 wickets), followed by a one run victory over Australia B (becoming a special match in the Cup) with our tax barrister and captain John Brinsmead-Stockham on 98 not out just behind Andrew de Mestre with 104 creating 230-1. Australia 229. Last 4 balls, Dan bowling, w1.2. Now BEWCC thinks it is going to win the Cup. Unfortunately, India A, batting first for 403-8, put our hopes in true perspective. BEWCC 89-10. The high point was Gordon Lee’s lbw of the Indian ‘professional’ after two, he says, dropped catches of same gentleman (see below). These are all 35 over matches as stipulated in the rules. Chastened, next up being Sri Lanka, BEWCC was further put in the corner with 112-9. It took a mere 10 overs to pass our score. Never mind, our last pool match, played at the old test ground of the Oval, a pitch played on by Bradman no less, gave BEWCC a satisfactory and first ever win over the West Indies (mostly Trinidadians). In reply to their 188-7 BEWCC deployed the above-heroic pair (JB-S 65 NO; AdM 60) to reach 192-1 in 24 overs.
The equalising game against the equivalently placed team in the other pool brought BEWCC head to head with the English Solicitors. Although the solicitors won in a reduced overs game, it was a good game giving BEWCC sixth place overall, followed by a pizza-fest by the luxurious pool in the luxurious hotel (at least to this legal aid barrister), overlooked by a railway station so we could watch local life pass by.
"Unfortunately the usual harmony of our Cup was ruptured by cross-accusations that [India and Pakistan] were playing men who had ‘first-class cricket’ experience which is against the rules… They both had to be disqualified"
The final was supposed to be between India and Pakistan. Unfortunately, the usual harmony of our Cup was ruptured by cross-accusations that these two teams were playing men who had ‘first-class cricket’ experience which is against the rules. The committee (the leaders of each team or country) acted with exceptional speed. Within three hours of the ‘debate’ a court was convened, evidence received and a decision made. There was no option, rules being rules. They both had to be disqualified. The next day the final was played between Australia A and Sri Lanka A (they having played each other the day before) and the Cup came to a successful conclusion. Australia won.
It is of great interest to view the way each team approaches the Cup; even between the solicitors and BEWCC there is a cultural gap. BEWCC is pure cricket. The young members are growing into a strong core, the last four mentioned in the team list, left. As always the teams hosted each other and Sri Lanka gave us all opportunities to meet in the evening. I notice that as the years roll by a number of genuine friendships have grown between individuals across the Commonwealth. All as it should be.
The next Cup will be held in New Zealand in January 2020 and new recruits should email: jamesiccy@aol.com.
James remembers the Assizes but this does not prevent him enjoying and playing cricket. He is happy to have co-founded the Lawyers Cricket World Cup.
The Bar of England and Wales Cricket Club (BEWCC) began with enormous enthusiasm. First a demolition of Bangladesh (Dan Burton 5 wickets), followed by a one run victory over Australia B (becoming a special match in the Cup) with our tax barrister and captain John Brinsmead-Stockham on 98 not out just behind Andrew de Mestre with 104 creating 230-1. Australia 229. Last 4 balls, Dan bowling, w1.2. Now BEWCC thinks it is going to win the Cup. Unfortunately, India A, batting first for 403-8, put our hopes in true perspective. BEWCC 89-10. The high point was Gordon Lee’s lbw of the Indian ‘professional’ after two, he says, dropped catches of same gentleman (see below). These are all 35 over matches as stipulated in the rules. Chastened, next up being Sri Lanka, BEWCC was further put in the corner with 112-9. It took a mere 10 overs to pass our score. Never mind, our last pool match, played at the old test ground of the Oval, a pitch played on by Bradman no less, gave BEWCC a satisfactory and first ever win over the West Indies (mostly Trinidadians). In reply to their 188-7 BEWCC deployed the above-heroic pair (JB-S 65 NO; AdM 60) to reach 192-1 in 24 overs.
The equalising game against the equivalently placed team in the other pool brought BEWCC head to head with the English Solicitors. Although the solicitors won in a reduced overs game, it was a good game giving BEWCC sixth place overall, followed by a pizza-fest by the luxurious pool in the luxurious hotel (at least to this legal aid barrister), overlooked by a railway station so we could watch local life pass by.
"Unfortunately the usual harmony of our Cup was ruptured by cross-accusations that [India and Pakistan] were playing men who had ‘first-class cricket’ experience which is against the rules… They both had to be disqualified"
The final was supposed to be between India and Pakistan. Unfortunately, the usual harmony of our Cup was ruptured by cross-accusations that these two teams were playing men who had ‘first-class cricket’ experience which is against the rules. The committee (the leaders of each team or country) acted with exceptional speed. Within three hours of the ‘debate’ a court was convened, evidence received and a decision made. There was no option, rules being rules. They both had to be disqualified. The next day the final was played between Australia A and Sri Lanka A (they having played each other the day before) and the Cup came to a successful conclusion. Australia won.
It is of great interest to view the way each team approaches the Cup; even between the solicitors and BEWCC there is a cultural gap. BEWCC is pure cricket. The young members are growing into a strong core, the last four mentioned in the team list, left. As always the teams hosted each other and Sri Lanka gave us all opportunities to meet in the evening. I notice that as the years roll by a number of genuine friendships have grown between individuals across the Commonwealth. All as it should be.
The next Cup will be held in New Zealand in January 2020 and new recruits should email: jamesiccy@aol.com.
Now a settled event, we’re looking ahead to New Zealand 2020. Meanwhile Sri Lanka in 2017 saw the usual format of two pools of six teams, reports James Cartwright
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
The golden age of advocacy? David Langwallner pays homage to the filmic if contentious barrister Sir Edward Carson and some of his contemporaries
Leah Arthur, a pupil, and her second seat supervisor, John Goss, share their perspectives on building a productive pupil-supervisor relationship
Henry Fingerhut outlines what the Bar Standards Board AI guidance means for early career barristers
The Ministry of Justice will match-fund up to 100 criminal pupillages, with grants available to criminal chambers across England and Wales. Similar to the COIC scheme, the grants will match-fund pupillages additional to those otherwise offered without government funding
Not yet, says Jacob Turner. Regulation, unlike the technology itself, is a domain the legal profession can still control
