*/
Current laws on admissibility of expert evidence in criminal trials are “unsatisfactory” and may have led to miscarriages of justice, according to the Law Commission.
In a consultation paper launched in April, “The Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in England and Wales”, the Commissioners recommend a new test for admissibility and new guidelines to help Crown Court judges and magistrates determine whether evidence is sufficiently reliable to be admitted.
Law Commissioner Professor Jeremy Horder said expert evidence, particularly scientific evidence, “could have a very persuasive effect on juries.
“There have been miscarriages of justice in recent years where prosecution expert evidence of doubtful reliability has been placed before Crown Court juries”.
The Commission has established an interactive online forum where consultees can view the proposals and make comments at www.lawcom.gov.uk/expert_evidence.htm
In a consultation paper launched in April, “The Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in England and Wales”, the Commissioners recommend a new test for admissibility and new guidelines to help Crown Court judges and magistrates determine whether evidence is sufficiently reliable to be admitted.
Law Commissioner Professor Jeremy Horder said expert evidence, particularly scientific evidence, “could have a very persuasive effect on juries.
“There have been miscarriages of justice in recent years where prosecution expert evidence of doubtful reliability has been placed before Crown Court juries”.
The Commission has established an interactive online forum where consultees can view the proposals and make comments at www.lawcom.gov.uk/expert_evidence.htm
Current laws on admissibility of expert evidence in criminal trials are “unsatisfactory” and may have led to miscarriages of justice, according to the Law Commission.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
At least not that way, says Richard Paige
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
