*/
A bold ‘hi-tech’ vision for the future of HMCTS shouldn’t ignore that access to justice is being steadily eroded by ‘enhanced’ court fees and the radical cuts to legal aid
Every barrister will be affected in some way by the shared £1bn vision for the future of HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) set out in the recent joint statement, Transforming our Justice System, issued by the Lord Chancellor, Lord Chief Justice and Senior President of Tribunals.
Some of us have already begun to see the impact, such as in the criminal field with the rolling out of the Crown Court Digital Case System and Better Case Management. The Bar Council will respond to the two consultations issued alongside the statement: one on the proposals for its implementation and the other on delivery of a more diverse judiciary. But I would encourage all barristers to make the time to read the joint statement.
The way we live our lives continues to change rapidly as a result of the ongoing ‘tech’ revolution. It has been said that the pace of change over the next 18 months will be equivalent to the change we have experienced over the last 20 years. As barristers we must ensure that we are prepared. Whether as individuals we like these changes or not, we cannot afford to ignore them. During the summer, as part of the Canadian Bar’s Legal Conference, I had the opportunity to see pitches from a number of new legal start-ups in Canada, ranging from sophisticated legal research tools, to prediction software based on basic case details, to software which aimed to alert clients to risky clauses in contracts during the bidding phase and had the ability to learn the more the client used it. They will inevitably change the legal market, and how we as legal professionals practise. In some cases such companies will assist us, and in others, they may well compete with traditional lawyers.
Encouragingly, a study by Oxford University in 2014 concluded that solicitors, barristers and judges only had a 3.5% chance of being replaced by automation. But the changes will nonetheless be substantial, as evidenced by the joint statement.
The Government and HMCTS need to move forward into the 21st century. The plans are ambitious and bold. Quite aside from the Government’s historic bad luck with large IT projects, the challenges are several: implementation – how the broad vision of a justice system for the future becomes a reality; continued investment – ensuring that the necessary input of finance, time and people is available, and continues to be available going forward; and preservation – ensuring that while embracing innovation and change we do not inadvertently undermine the fundamentals of what has made our justice system among the best in the world.
A justice system that is just, proportionate and accessible and that provides ‘justice for everyone’ are the stated aims of Transforming our Justice System. I doubt any of us would disagree with these aims. But it is concerning that there seems to be little recognition in Government that access to courts and tribunals has been eroded in recent years by ‘enhanced’ and ‘increased’ court fees, and by radical cuts to legal aid in family and social welfare cases.
The spending commitment of about £1bn is encouraging and necessary. We will work with the judiciary, HMCTS and the Ministry of Justice in the implementation of these plans. But we will also continue to raise concerns, where we have them, about the proposals, and to lobby on issues, such as legal aid and court fees, which directly impact on access to justice. We will continue to press the case for a full post-legislative review of LASPO. The impact of the Coalition Government’s cost-cutting legislation, on which the Commons’ Justice Committee rightly focused their concerns, needs to be assessed soon, to avoid repeating past errors.
We will be debating these issues at this year’s annual Bar and Young Bar Conference on Saturday 15 October: ‘Raising the Bar: Innovation and global opportunity for a forward thinking profession’. If you can attend, you should.
Contributor Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, Chairman of the Bar
WORKING ON YOUR BEHALF
Here’s a glimpse of just some of the Bar Council’s work in August 2016:
Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC is the Head of Atkin Chambers and was 2016 Chair of the Bar of England and Wales.
Every barrister will be affected in some way by the shared £1bn vision for the future of HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) set out in the recent joint statement, Transforming our Justice System, issued by the Lord Chancellor, Lord Chief Justice and Senior President of Tribunals.
Some of us have already begun to see the impact, such as in the criminal field with the rolling out of the Crown Court Digital Case System and Better Case Management. The Bar Council will respond to the two consultations issued alongside the statement: one on the proposals for its implementation and the other on delivery of a more diverse judiciary. But I would encourage all barristers to make the time to read the joint statement.
The way we live our lives continues to change rapidly as a result of the ongoing ‘tech’ revolution. It has been said that the pace of change over the next 18 months will be equivalent to the change we have experienced over the last 20 years. As barristers we must ensure that we are prepared. Whether as individuals we like these changes or not, we cannot afford to ignore them. During the summer, as part of the Canadian Bar’s Legal Conference, I had the opportunity to see pitches from a number of new legal start-ups in Canada, ranging from sophisticated legal research tools, to prediction software based on basic case details, to software which aimed to alert clients to risky clauses in contracts during the bidding phase and had the ability to learn the more the client used it. They will inevitably change the legal market, and how we as legal professionals practise. In some cases such companies will assist us, and in others, they may well compete with traditional lawyers.
Encouragingly, a study by Oxford University in 2014 concluded that solicitors, barristers and judges only had a 3.5% chance of being replaced by automation. But the changes will nonetheless be substantial, as evidenced by the joint statement.
The Government and HMCTS need to move forward into the 21st century. The plans are ambitious and bold. Quite aside from the Government’s historic bad luck with large IT projects, the challenges are several: implementation – how the broad vision of a justice system for the future becomes a reality; continued investment – ensuring that the necessary input of finance, time and people is available, and continues to be available going forward; and preservation – ensuring that while embracing innovation and change we do not inadvertently undermine the fundamentals of what has made our justice system among the best in the world.
A justice system that is just, proportionate and accessible and that provides ‘justice for everyone’ are the stated aims of Transforming our Justice System. I doubt any of us would disagree with these aims. But it is concerning that there seems to be little recognition in Government that access to courts and tribunals has been eroded in recent years by ‘enhanced’ and ‘increased’ court fees, and by radical cuts to legal aid in family and social welfare cases.
The spending commitment of about £1bn is encouraging and necessary. We will work with the judiciary, HMCTS and the Ministry of Justice in the implementation of these plans. But we will also continue to raise concerns, where we have them, about the proposals, and to lobby on issues, such as legal aid and court fees, which directly impact on access to justice. We will continue to press the case for a full post-legislative review of LASPO. The impact of the Coalition Government’s cost-cutting legislation, on which the Commons’ Justice Committee rightly focused their concerns, needs to be assessed soon, to avoid repeating past errors.
We will be debating these issues at this year’s annual Bar and Young Bar Conference on Saturday 15 October: ‘Raising the Bar: Innovation and global opportunity for a forward thinking profession’. If you can attend, you should.
Contributor Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, Chairman of the Bar
WORKING ON YOUR BEHALF
Here’s a glimpse of just some of the Bar Council’s work in August 2016:
A bold ‘hi-tech’ vision for the future of HMCTS shouldn’t ignore that access to justice is being steadily eroded by ‘enhanced’ court fees and the radical cuts to legal aid
As we look ahead to Justice Week 2022, the sustainability of the Criminal Bar remains a critical issue for the government to address
Opportunity for female sopranos/contraltos in secondary education, or who have recently finished secondary education but have not yet begun tertiary education. Eligibility includes children of members of the Bar
Fear of the collection and test process is a common factor among clients, especially among vulnerable adults in complex family law cases. Cansford Laboratories shares some tips to help the testing process run as smoothly as possible
Casey Randall explains how complex relationship DNA tests can best be used – and interpreted – by counsel
Casey Randall, Head of DNA at AlphaBiolabs, explores what barristers need to know about DNA testing for immigration, including when a client might wish to submit DNA evidence, and which relationship tests are best for immigration applications
Julian Morgan reminds barristers of the top five areas to consider before 5 April
If the Bar cannot define and prohibit bullying behaviour, what chance do we have of persuading the Judiciary to do so? Darren Howe QC and Professor Jo Delahunty QC's call to action on codification plus suggested strategies for dealing with bullying from the Bar and Bench
The case ofR v Brecanihas complicated matters for defence lawyers. Emma Fielding talks to gang culture expert, Dr Simon Harding about County Lines, exploitation and modern slavery
Barristers are particularly at risk of burnout because of the nature of our work and our approach to it but it doesnt have to be this way. Jade Bucklow explores how culture, work and lifestyle changes can rejuvinate our mental health...
The Schools Consent Project (SCP) is educating tens of thousands of teenagers about the law around consent to challenge and change what is now endemic behaviour. Here, its founder, barrister Kate Parker talks to Chris Henley QC about SCPs work and its association with Jodie Comers West End playPrima Facie, in which she plays a criminal barrister who is sexually assaulted
Following the launch of the Life at the Young Bar report and a nationwide listening exercise, Michael Polak and Michael Harwood outline the Young Barristers Committees raft of initiatives designed to address your issues of concern
