*/
A bold ‘hi-tech’ vision for the future of HMCTS shouldn’t ignore that access to justice is being steadily eroded by ‘enhanced’ court fees and the radical cuts to legal aid
Every barrister will be affected in some way by the shared £1bn vision for the future of HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) set out in the recent joint statement, Transforming our Justice System, issued by the Lord Chancellor, Lord Chief Justice and Senior President of Tribunals.
Some of us have already begun to see the impact, such as in the criminal field with the rolling out of the Crown Court Digital Case System and Better Case Management. The Bar Council will respond to the two consultations issued alongside the statement: one on the proposals for its implementation and the other on delivery of a more diverse judiciary. But I would encourage all barristers to make the time to read the joint statement.
The way we live our lives continues to change rapidly as a result of the ongoing ‘tech’ revolution. It has been said that the pace of change over the next 18 months will be equivalent to the change we have experienced over the last 20 years. As barristers we must ensure that we are prepared. Whether as individuals we like these changes or not, we cannot afford to ignore them. During the summer, as part of the Canadian Bar’s Legal Conference, I had the opportunity to see pitches from a number of new legal start-ups in Canada, ranging from sophisticated legal research tools, to prediction software based on basic case details, to software which aimed to alert clients to risky clauses in contracts during the bidding phase and had the ability to learn the more the client used it. They will inevitably change the legal market, and how we as legal professionals practise. In some cases such companies will assist us, and in others, they may well compete with traditional lawyers.
Encouragingly, a study by Oxford University in 2014 concluded that solicitors, barristers and judges only had a 3.5% chance of being replaced by automation. But the changes will nonetheless be substantial, as evidenced by the joint statement.
The Government and HMCTS need to move forward into the 21st century. The plans are ambitious and bold. Quite aside from the Government’s historic bad luck with large IT projects, the challenges are several: implementation – how the broad vision of a justice system for the future becomes a reality; continued investment – ensuring that the necessary input of finance, time and people is available, and continues to be available going forward; and preservation – ensuring that while embracing innovation and change we do not inadvertently undermine the fundamentals of what has made our justice system among the best in the world.
A justice system that is just, proportionate and accessible and that provides ‘justice for everyone’ are the stated aims of Transforming our Justice System. I doubt any of us would disagree with these aims. But it is concerning that there seems to be little recognition in Government that access to courts and tribunals has been eroded in recent years by ‘enhanced’ and ‘increased’ court fees, and by radical cuts to legal aid in family and social welfare cases.
The spending commitment of about £1bn is encouraging and necessary. We will work with the judiciary, HMCTS and the Ministry of Justice in the implementation of these plans. But we will also continue to raise concerns, where we have them, about the proposals, and to lobby on issues, such as legal aid and court fees, which directly impact on access to justice. We will continue to press the case for a full post-legislative review of LASPO. The impact of the Coalition Government’s cost-cutting legislation, on which the Commons’ Justice Committee rightly focused their concerns, needs to be assessed soon, to avoid repeating past errors.
We will be debating these issues at this year’s annual Bar and Young Bar Conference on Saturday 15 October: ‘Raising the Bar: Innovation and global opportunity for a forward thinking profession’. If you can attend, you should.
Contributor Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, Chairman of the Bar
WORKING ON YOUR BEHALF
Here’s a glimpse of just some of the Bar Council’s work in August 2016:
Chantal-Aimée Doerries KC is the Head of Atkin Chambers and was 2016 Chair of the Bar of England and Wales.
Every barrister will be affected in some way by the shared £1bn vision for the future of HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) set out in the recent joint statement, Transforming our Justice System, issued by the Lord Chancellor, Lord Chief Justice and Senior President of Tribunals.
Some of us have already begun to see the impact, such as in the criminal field with the rolling out of the Crown Court Digital Case System and Better Case Management. The Bar Council will respond to the two consultations issued alongside the statement: one on the proposals for its implementation and the other on delivery of a more diverse judiciary. But I would encourage all barristers to make the time to read the joint statement.
The way we live our lives continues to change rapidly as a result of the ongoing ‘tech’ revolution. It has been said that the pace of change over the next 18 months will be equivalent to the change we have experienced over the last 20 years. As barristers we must ensure that we are prepared. Whether as individuals we like these changes or not, we cannot afford to ignore them. During the summer, as part of the Canadian Bar’s Legal Conference, I had the opportunity to see pitches from a number of new legal start-ups in Canada, ranging from sophisticated legal research tools, to prediction software based on basic case details, to software which aimed to alert clients to risky clauses in contracts during the bidding phase and had the ability to learn the more the client used it. They will inevitably change the legal market, and how we as legal professionals practise. In some cases such companies will assist us, and in others, they may well compete with traditional lawyers.
Encouragingly, a study by Oxford University in 2014 concluded that solicitors, barristers and judges only had a 3.5% chance of being replaced by automation. But the changes will nonetheless be substantial, as evidenced by the joint statement.
The Government and HMCTS need to move forward into the 21st century. The plans are ambitious and bold. Quite aside from the Government’s historic bad luck with large IT projects, the challenges are several: implementation – how the broad vision of a justice system for the future becomes a reality; continued investment – ensuring that the necessary input of finance, time and people is available, and continues to be available going forward; and preservation – ensuring that while embracing innovation and change we do not inadvertently undermine the fundamentals of what has made our justice system among the best in the world.
A justice system that is just, proportionate and accessible and that provides ‘justice for everyone’ are the stated aims of Transforming our Justice System. I doubt any of us would disagree with these aims. But it is concerning that there seems to be little recognition in Government that access to courts and tribunals has been eroded in recent years by ‘enhanced’ and ‘increased’ court fees, and by radical cuts to legal aid in family and social welfare cases.
The spending commitment of about £1bn is encouraging and necessary. We will work with the judiciary, HMCTS and the Ministry of Justice in the implementation of these plans. But we will also continue to raise concerns, where we have them, about the proposals, and to lobby on issues, such as legal aid and court fees, which directly impact on access to justice. We will continue to press the case for a full post-legislative review of LASPO. The impact of the Coalition Government’s cost-cutting legislation, on which the Commons’ Justice Committee rightly focused their concerns, needs to be assessed soon, to avoid repeating past errors.
We will be debating these issues at this year’s annual Bar and Young Bar Conference on Saturday 15 October: ‘Raising the Bar: Innovation and global opportunity for a forward thinking profession’. If you can attend, you should.
Contributor Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, Chairman of the Bar
WORKING ON YOUR BEHALF
Here’s a glimpse of just some of the Bar Council’s work in August 2016:
A bold ‘hi-tech’ vision for the future of HMCTS shouldn’t ignore that access to justice is being steadily eroded by ‘enhanced’ court fees and the radical cuts to legal aid
The age of criminal responsibility, extreme weather and conflict resolution – plus, new protocol for reporting bullying at the Bar
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
Unlocking your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step. By Philip N Bristow
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, discusses the upcoming changes to pensions and Inheritance Tax and the potential impact on your financial future
Save the Children UK is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
Barrister apprenticeships – shortly to provide the fourth pathway to the Bar – are an ideal opportunity to support local talent and ‘grow your own’, say Tim Coulson and Dr Jane Dennehy
Solicitor General Ellie Reeves KC MP discusses her decade as a trade union and employment law barrister, the demands of life as a Law Officer and the number one priority shaping her work. Interview by Anthony Inglese CB
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
Why every major sporting event needs an anti-corruption policy. By Louis Weston
At least not that way, says Richard Paige
