*/
The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, has warned that the justice system must adapt to make sure people can access it without lawyers.
In a speech to the Legal Research Foundation in New Zealand Thomas said that the “often prohibitive” cost of lawyers, legal aid cuts and court charges were “putting access to justice out of the reach of most” and “imperilling a core principle of Magna Carta”.
There is, he said, “a risk that access to justice is not being provided”.
He said: “It is important to remind lawyers at times that the justice system is not there for them (although they unquestionably play an important part) but for the public.
“The justice system therefore needs to adapt to make sure that people can still access it without lawyers by a process designed to work without lawyers.”
Touching on measures being considered in England and Wales to increase efficiency, including online dispute resolution, he said “justice must be made available through the most effective means”.
He said: “It is therefore necessary to re-cast our justice system to equip it for the present, and to future-proof it so far as possible.”
Thomas continued: “Stabilising its financing, making effective use of its buildings, allocating work appropriately, and exploiting the advantages that technology and digitisation can bring are the only way to do this.
“To do this will be to ensure access to justice in the 21st century and to safeguard one of the principal legacies of Magna Carta for now and for the future.”
The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, has warned that the justice system must adapt to make sure people can access it without lawyers.
In a speech to the Legal Research Foundation in New Zealand Thomas said that the “often prohibitive” cost of lawyers, legal aid cuts and court charges were “putting access to justice out of the reach of most” and “imperilling a core principle of Magna Carta”.
There is, he said, “a risk that access to justice is not being provided”.
He said: “It is important to remind lawyers at times that the justice system is not there for them (although they unquestionably play an important part) but for the public.
“The justice system therefore needs to adapt to make sure that people can still access it without lawyers by a process designed to work without lawyers.”
Touching on measures being considered in England and Wales to increase efficiency, including online dispute resolution, he said “justice must be made available through the most effective means”.
He said: “It is therefore necessary to re-cast our justice system to equip it for the present, and to future-proof it so far as possible.”
Thomas continued: “Stabilising its financing, making effective use of its buildings, allocating work appropriately, and exploiting the advantages that technology and digitisation can bring are the only way to do this.
“To do this will be to ensure access to justice in the 21st century and to safeguard one of the principal legacies of Magna Carta for now and for the future.”
The Chair of the Bar reports back
By Kem Kemal, CEO, Henry Dannell
By BSK Financial Planning
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Kick off your career at the Bar Council’s Pupillage Fair this October – it’s one of the most valuable opportunities for aspiring barristers, says Amelia Clegg
Join us on Saturday 21 November 2026 at Leeds Beckett University and see for yourself why the North continues to be an exceptional place to build a career at the Bar
The golden age of advocacy? David Langwallner pays homage to the filmic if contentious barrister Sir Edward Carson and some of his contemporaries
Henry Fingerhut outlines what the Bar Standards Board AI guidance means for early career barristers
Not yet, says Jacob Turner. Regulation, unlike the technology itself, is a domain the legal profession can still control