*/
Courts
The impingement of modern technology on trial by jury remains under close scrutiny this year.
Writing in The Court of Appeal’s (Criminal Division) Annual Report 2011-12, Lord Judge, the Lord Chief Justice, noted an increase in the number of cases where allegations of juror misuse of technology have featured in the grounds of appeal.
“This is a matter that will require close attention over the coming year to ensure the continuing integrity of the jury system,” said the LCJ. “The Court is deeply indebted to the Criminal Cases Review Commission for all aspects of their assistance, not least the way in which they carry out investigations into allegations of jury misconduct,” he added.
Statistics showed a six per cent increase in the total number of applications compared with the previous year (7,442 in 2011/12 compared with 6,972 in 2010/11). On average – taken over a three year period – 11 per cent of conviction applications and 25 per cent of sentence applications received are successful.
The report, published in December last year, also revealed a swifter pace of justice. Appeals for the court year 2011/12 were heard more quickly than in previous years: 7.8 months for conviction cases where leave to appeal was granted or the case referred to the full court (compared with 9.3 months in 2010/11) and 4.5 months for sentence cases (compared with 4.6 months in 2010/11).
The Attorney General referred 98 potentially unduly lenient sentences pursuant to section 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (compared with 102 cases in 2010/11). Of those cases dealt with by the full court, 73 resulted in an increase in sentence.
The court also received 97 confiscation cases (compared to 102 cases in 2010/11). It received 33 prosecution appeals under section 58 Criminal Justice Act 2003 (compared to 28 in 2010/11); one application under part 10 Criminal Justice Act 2003 for retrial for serious offences (‘double jeopardy’) and nine interlocutory applications (compared to 16 in 2010/11).
Positive use of technology within the courts was highlighted in the report; namely digital recording equipment for faster transcription and increased use of video-link facilities, with 128 successful video-links to prisons last year. Counsel and two witnesses have also appeared from remote locations via video-link.
Thousands more appearances by video-link are projected this year as part of the Government’s “quick effective justice” regime. Justice and Policing Minister Damian Green announced last month that video technology will be rolled out to 13 new areas: Avon and Somerset, Cambridgeshire, Sussex, Staffordshire, Suffolk, Dorset, Northamptonshire, Devon and Cornwall, Wiltshire, North Wales, Gwent, Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire.
Writing in The Court of Appeal’s (Criminal Division) Annual Report 2011-12, Lord Judge, the Lord Chief Justice, noted an increase in the number of cases where allegations of juror misuse of technology have featured in the grounds of appeal.
“This is a matter that will require close attention over the coming year to ensure the continuing integrity of the jury system,” said the LCJ. “The Court is deeply indebted to the Criminal Cases Review Commission for all aspects of their assistance, not least the way in which they carry out investigations into allegations of jury misconduct,” he added.
Statistics showed a six per cent increase in the total number of applications compared with the previous year (7,442 in 2011/12 compared with 6,972 in 2010/11). On average – taken over a three year period – 11 per cent of conviction applications and 25 per cent of sentence applications received are successful.
The report, published in December last year, also revealed a swifter pace of justice. Appeals for the court year 2011/12 were heard more quickly than in previous years: 7.8 months for conviction cases where leave to appeal was granted or the case referred to the full court (compared with 9.3 months in 2010/11) and 4.5 months for sentence cases (compared with 4.6 months in 2010/11).
The Attorney General referred 98 potentially unduly lenient sentences pursuant to section 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (compared with 102 cases in 2010/11). Of those cases dealt with by the full court, 73 resulted in an increase in sentence.
The court also received 97 confiscation cases (compared to 102 cases in 2010/11). It received 33 prosecution appeals under section 58 Criminal Justice Act 2003 (compared to 28 in 2010/11); one application under part 10 Criminal Justice Act 2003 for retrial for serious offences (‘double jeopardy’) and nine interlocutory applications (compared to 16 in 2010/11).
Positive use of technology within the courts was highlighted in the report; namely digital recording equipment for faster transcription and increased use of video-link facilities, with 128 successful video-links to prisons last year. Counsel and two witnesses have also appeared from remote locations via video-link.
Thousands more appearances by video-link are projected this year as part of the Government’s “quick effective justice” regime. Justice and Policing Minister Damian Green announced last month that video technology will be rolled out to 13 new areas: Avon and Somerset, Cambridgeshire, Sussex, Staffordshire, Suffolk, Dorset, Northamptonshire, Devon and Cornwall, Wiltshire, North Wales, Gwent, Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire.
Courts
The impingement of modern technology on trial by jury remains under close scrutiny this year.
As we look ahead to Justice Week 2022, the sustainability of the Criminal Bar remains a critical issue for the government to address
Opportunity for female sopranos/contraltos in secondary education, or who have recently finished secondary education but have not yet begun tertiary education. Eligibility includes children of members of the Bar
Fear of the collection and test process is a common factor among clients, especially among vulnerable adults in complex family law cases. Cansford Laboratories shares some tips to help the testing process run as smoothly as possible
Casey Randall explains how complex relationship DNA tests can best be used – and interpreted – by counsel
Casey Randall, Head of DNA at AlphaBiolabs, explores what barristers need to know about DNA testing for immigration, including when a client might wish to submit DNA evidence, and which relationship tests are best for immigration applications
Julian Morgan reminds barristers of the top five areas to consider before 5 April
If the Bar cannot define and prohibit bullying behaviour, what chance do we have of persuading the Judiciary to do so? Darren Howe QC and Professor Jo Delahunty QC's call to action on codification plus suggested strategies for dealing with bullying from the Bar and Bench
The case ofR v Brecanihas complicated matters for defence lawyers. Emma Fielding talks to gang culture expert, Dr Simon Harding about County Lines, exploitation and modern slavery
Barristers are particularly at risk of burnout because of the nature of our work and our approach to it but it doesnt have to be this way. Jade Bucklow explores how culture, work and lifestyle changes can rejuvinate our mental health...
The Schools Consent Project (SCP) is educating tens of thousands of teenagers about the law around consent to challenge and change what is now endemic behaviour. Here, its founder, barrister Kate Parker talks to Chris Henley QC about SCPs work and its association with Jodie Comers West End playPrima Facie, in which she plays a criminal barrister who is sexually assaulted
Following the launch of the Life at the Young Bar report and a nationwide listening exercise, Michael Polak and Michael Harwood outline the Young Barristers Committees raft of initiatives designed to address your issues of concern
