*/
Almost half of all judges would retire early due to poor pay and pension cuts and concerns over their safety, a survey revealed.
The second Judicial Attitudes Survey, carried out over the summer, showed that 42% of judges would leave if it was a ‘viable option’, almost double the 23% from the previous survey in 2014.
More than a third (36%) of salaried judges said they may consider leaving the judiciary early over the next five years. But the highest proportions who say they would leave early were at the High Court (47%), Court of Appeal (41%) and Circuit judges (40%).
A majority of judges (76%) felt their working conditions had deteriorated since 2014. An overwhelming majority (78%) of salaried judges said they had a loss of net earnings over the last two years and 62% said the change in pensions has affected them personally. Overall, 74% felt their pay and pension entitlement did not adequately reflect their work.
More than half (51%) had concerns for their personal safety while in court, while 37% were concerned for their safety outside court and 15% had concerns related to social media.
Virtually all judges felt they provide an important service to society (97%) and had a strong personal attachment to being a member of the judiciary (90%), but they did not feel their work was valued. Less than half (43%) felt valued by the public, 3% by the media and 2% by the government.
Factors that would make them stay on the bench were higher pay (80%), a settled position on pensions (57%) and better administrative support (56%).
The Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas and the Senior President of Tribunals Sir Ernest Ryder said: ‘The quality of the judiciary underpins the rule of law and the continued success of our legal services market nationally and internationally.
‘We are therefore extremely grateful to those who took part in the survey, which assists the [Senior Salaries Review Body] in making evidence-based recommendations to government on judicial pay. ‘In the light of the substantially greater remuneration available to the most able practitioners in private practice, these matters are vital to our ability to attract candidates and retain judges of the highest calibre.’
In January an employment tribunal ruled that more than 200 judges, whose pension entitlements had been cut significantly, were discriminated against by the Ministry of Justice on the grounds of their age, sex and race.
Almost half of all judges would retire early due to poor pay and pension cuts and concerns over their safety, a survey revealed.
The second Judicial Attitudes Survey, carried out over the summer, showed that 42% of judges would leave if it was a ‘viable option’, almost double the 23% from the previous survey in 2014.
More than a third (36%) of salaried judges said they may consider leaving the judiciary early over the next five years. But the highest proportions who say they would leave early were at the High Court (47%), Court of Appeal (41%) and Circuit judges (40%).
A majority of judges (76%) felt their working conditions had deteriorated since 2014. An overwhelming majority (78%) of salaried judges said they had a loss of net earnings over the last two years and 62% said the change in pensions has affected them personally. Overall, 74% felt their pay and pension entitlement did not adequately reflect their work.
More than half (51%) had concerns for their personal safety while in court, while 37% were concerned for their safety outside court and 15% had concerns related to social media.
Virtually all judges felt they provide an important service to society (97%) and had a strong personal attachment to being a member of the judiciary (90%), but they did not feel their work was valued. Less than half (43%) felt valued by the public, 3% by the media and 2% by the government.
Factors that would make them stay on the bench were higher pay (80%), a settled position on pensions (57%) and better administrative support (56%).
The Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas and the Senior President of Tribunals Sir Ernest Ryder said: ‘The quality of the judiciary underpins the rule of law and the continued success of our legal services market nationally and internationally.
‘We are therefore extremely grateful to those who took part in the survey, which assists the [Senior Salaries Review Body] in making evidence-based recommendations to government on judicial pay. ‘In the light of the substantially greater remuneration available to the most able practitioners in private practice, these matters are vital to our ability to attract candidates and retain judges of the highest calibre.’
In January an employment tribunal ruled that more than 200 judges, whose pension entitlements had been cut significantly, were discriminated against by the Ministry of Justice on the grounds of their age, sex and race.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
By Kem Kemal, CEO, Henry Dannell
By BSK Financial Planning
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Kick off your career at the Bar Council’s Pupillage Fair this October – it’s one of the most valuable opportunities for aspiring barristers, says Amelia Clegg
The golden age of advocacy? David Langwallner pays homage to the filmic if contentious barrister Sir Edward Carson and some of his contemporaries
Henry Fingerhut outlines what the Bar Standards Board AI guidance means for early career barristers
The Ministry of Justice will match-fund up to 100 criminal pupillages, with grants available to criminal chambers across England and Wales. Similar to the COIC scheme, the grants will match-fund pupillages additional to those otherwise offered without government funding
Not yet, says Jacob Turner. Regulation, unlike the technology itself, is a domain the legal profession can still control
