*/
Name: John Holland
Position: Chambers Manager
Chambers: 2 Paper Buildings
There have been significant changes happening at 2 Paper Buildings: a new head of chambers, expanding to new premises and a new identity. Why now?
It seems that everything is happening at once, but these changes have been planned over a good period of time. The decision to move to bigger and better premises was taken some time ago, and it has taken a while to get everything right. Sir Desmond decided that the move would be the right time for him to step down as head of chambers after nearly quarter of a century, and Harendra de Silva QC is taking over as the new head. We also thought that, with the change of address and a new head of chambers, the time was right for a new name as well.
You have recently taken on a new senior clerk as well?
Whilst we may have a new home, a new head and a new name, we wanted to go back to a more traditional clerking structure. We were absolutely delighted to capture the services of Michael Martin as our new senior clerk. He is one of the true heavyweights in clerking and his leadership, knowledge and wealth of experience will play a huge role in the years to come.
Creating a new identity is relatively new at the Bar and goes against tradition. Were your members happy with this?
There was overwhelming support for the move, but a recognition that we couldn’t go on calling ourselves 2PB at a different address. We didn’t want to lose our identity and knew that our new name would say something about us as a brand, balancing the chambers’ traditions with our modern approach. We felt that simply taking the name of our new address wouldn’t do that and so we have gone for something a little less traditional. We used an excellent marketing firm to assist us and got our members closely involved with this project, as ultimately, the members are the identity of any chambers. We are really happy with the new name.
Is there anything you’d like to share on chambers’ new identity?
I’m afraid you’ll have to wait a little longer. We are still finalising the design, colour scheme and website, and then we will be ready for the launch of the new name. We hope to publicise this in the April edition of Counsel, so you will have to wait until then.
Why are you making all these changes when the criminal Bar are facing such tough challenges?
The criminal Bar has always faced challenges, and we know that a key part of ensuring survival and success is to make sure that we are fully prepared for what lies ahead. We have been carefully preparing chambers to face the challenges the criminal Bar faces, and these changes are an important part of that business plan. We are optimistic this will put us in a strong position to flourish.
What future challenges do you envisage?
There are so many challenges to the criminal Bar at the moment. Obviously the issue over very high cost cases, and fees more generally, are at the forefront of the mind, but there are also the challenges posed by “in-house” advocates and the proposals for legal disciplinary practices. Frankly, just keeping up with all the consultation processes for the changes is something of a challenge at the moment.
How will the changes to the criminal Bar impact on your chambers?
There is no point in pretending that the real-terms cuts in funding and the seizing of certain work by “in-house” advocates will not have an impact upon us. These are difficult times for the criminal Bar as a whole, but we think that we are extremely well placed to weather the storm, and to emerge from it even stronger. The new premises, the restructuring of the clerking and the new identity are all a part of making sure that we are ready to face the challenges.
When will the new era begin?
Harendra de Silva QC and Michael Martin are already in place, and we hope to be in our new premises in April. The launch of the new identity will be an ongoing project for about 18 months and we hope to start rolling out this project at the beginning of March. It has been a lot of work co-ordinating multiple projects, but we are all looking forward to a new era at these chambers.
John Holland was interviewed by Guy Hewetson and Anil Shah, LPA Legal
There have been significant changes happening at 2 Paper Buildings: a new head of chambers, expanding to new premises and a new identity. Why now?
It seems that everything is happening at once, but these changes have been planned over a good period of time. The decision to move to bigger and better premises was taken some time ago, and it has taken a while to get everything right. Sir Desmond decided that the move would be the right time for him to step down as head of chambers after nearly quarter of a century, and Harendra de Silva QC is taking over as the new head. We also thought that, with the change of address and a new head of chambers, the time was right for a new name as well.
You have recently taken on a new senior clerk as well?
Whilst we may have a new home, a new head and a new name, we wanted to go back to a more traditional clerking structure. We were absolutely delighted to capture the services of Michael Martin as our new senior clerk. He is one of the true heavyweights in clerking and his leadership, knowledge and wealth of experience will play a huge role in the years to come.
Creating a new identity is relatively new at the Bar and goes against tradition. Were your members happy with this?
There was overwhelming support for the move, but a recognition that we couldn’t go on calling ourselves 2PB at a different address. We didn’t want to lose our identity and knew that our new name would say something about us as a brand, balancing the chambers’ traditions with our modern approach. We felt that simply taking the name of our new address wouldn’t do that and so we have gone for something a little less traditional. We used an excellent marketing firm to assist us and got our members closely involved with this project, as ultimately, the members are the identity of any chambers. We are really happy with the new name.
Is there anything you’d like to share on chambers’ new identity?
I’m afraid you’ll have to wait a little longer. We are still finalising the design, colour scheme and website, and then we will be ready for the launch of the new name. We hope to publicise this in the April edition of Counsel, so you will have to wait until then.
Why are you making all these changes when the criminal Bar are facing such tough challenges?
The criminal Bar has always faced challenges, and we know that a key part of ensuring survival and success is to make sure that we are fully prepared for what lies ahead. We have been carefully preparing chambers to face the challenges the criminal Bar faces, and these changes are an important part of that business plan. We are optimistic this will put us in a strong position to flourish.
What future challenges do you envisage?
There are so many challenges to the criminal Bar at the moment. Obviously the issue over very high cost cases, and fees more generally, are at the forefront of the mind, but there are also the challenges posed by “in-house” advocates and the proposals for legal disciplinary practices. Frankly, just keeping up with all the consultation processes for the changes is something of a challenge at the moment.
How will the changes to the criminal Bar impact on your chambers?
There is no point in pretending that the real-terms cuts in funding and the seizing of certain work by “in-house” advocates will not have an impact upon us. These are difficult times for the criminal Bar as a whole, but we think that we are extremely well placed to weather the storm, and to emerge from it even stronger. The new premises, the restructuring of the clerking and the new identity are all a part of making sure that we are ready to face the challenges.
When will the new era begin?
Harendra de Silva QC and Michael Martin are already in place, and we hope to be in our new premises in April. The launch of the new identity will be an ongoing project for about 18 months and we hope to start rolling out this project at the beginning of March. It has been a lot of work co-ordinating multiple projects, but we are all looking forward to a new era at these chambers.
John Holland was interviewed by Guy Hewetson and Anil Shah, LPA Legal
Name: John Holland
Position: Chambers Manager
Chambers: 2 Paper Buildings
Chair of the Bar finds common ground on legal services between our two jurisdictions, plus an update on jury trials
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
There is far more to Martyn Levett than the title of Resident Judge suggests, discovers Steven Ball. As a long-serving Honorary Recorder of Ipswich – a role that embodies the connection between civic life and the legal world – Judge Levett reflects on his community, charity work and criminal justice today
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Baffled by the government’s proposed s 41 reforms and by the Law Commission’s preferred model, Laura Hoyano looks at what won’t work, and what will
