*/
Some five years ago, as a law student with a penchant for trusts law and, admittedly, the sound of my own voice, I set my sights on a career at the Commercial Chancery Bar. I undertook a number of mini-pupillages at leading sets in Lincoln’s Inn. While each one served to confirm my career aspirations, women were conspicuous by their relative absence. I still recall that over the course of five commercial chancery mini-pupillages, I met only two female barristers. Naturally, this begged the question: why?
During my two years at a commercial chancery set, I am pleased to say that I am yet to experience a rude awakening in answer to this question. My experience has been (and remains) overwhelmingly positive. My colleagues – barristers and clerks alike – have been supportive and inclusive. This is doubtless due in part to having a female senior clerk at chambers’ helm, the knock-on effect of which is remarkable.
Any preconception that being a successful barrister requires casting a spotlight on more ‘masculine’ characteristics of driving ambition and aggression, while supressing the typically ‘soft’ or ‘feminine’ characteristics of being sensitive and understanding, for example, has been extinguished. On the contrary, I have found that the latter are not only compatible with building a practice at the Commercial Chancery Bar, but positively complementary. Embracing these has proved valuable in forging relationships with professional clients and ensuring that lay clients feel heard and reassured.
An ability to be unapologetically oneself extends, in my experience, to the social side of the Bar. The present-day Commercial Chancery Bar is no longer an exclusive boys’ club, where discussion centres around cricket, rugby and the like. Indeed, I have enlightened my colleagues as to the latest drama in ‘Love Is Blind’, Taylor Swift lore, and why skinny jeans are no longer socially acceptable. Notwithstanding this, there is a respect for the work I do and my ability to do it.
It would be remiss of me, however, to elide the fact that much progress is yet to be achieved. Machismo remains a feature of the Commercial Chancery Bar. For example, marketing events are often male-oriented activities involving heavy inebriation into the small hours. This is more frequently to the exclusion of female clients or colleagues than their male counterparts due, for example, to having greater responsibilities at home. Further, that this area of the Bar is male-dominated means that there is great statistical probability of being the only woman in the room at times. In this respect, there are undeniably greater hurdles for women (even if more perceived than real) to meaningfully network or connect with clients, the majority of whom still tend to be male, sharing more in common with male colleagues.
For me personally, however, the most noticeable discrepancy between young male and female practitioners is a different one altogether. At 23/24 years old, I have at times looked on with envy at my junior male colleagues who are spoiled for choice with role models in whom they may see a reflection of themselves. Of course, I do look up to, learn from and at times lean on my senior male, as well as female, colleagues. However, it was not until I met a former female member of chambers last year that I truly considered the rather more tangible benefit and inspiration that I and my female colleagues would experience if we, too, had a chain of accomplished, brilliant female barristers across the breadth of seniority in chambers, whose lived experience might be more similar to our own.
While it goes without saying that the Commercial Chancery Bar has quite some way to go, I am heartened that in the last five years I have seen increasing numbers of women applying and being recruited to commercial chancery sets, including my own. I am hopeful that this trend will continue. I look forward to seeing articles like this one, which aim to shed light on disparities at the Bar, become increasingly unnecessary; to young women applying to the Commercial Chancery Bar without any doubt as to whether they will fit in; and to hearing more Taylor Swift in chambers’ corridors.
Some five years ago, as a law student with a penchant for trusts law and, admittedly, the sound of my own voice, I set my sights on a career at the Commercial Chancery Bar. I undertook a number of mini-pupillages at leading sets in Lincoln’s Inn. While each one served to confirm my career aspirations, women were conspicuous by their relative absence. I still recall that over the course of five commercial chancery mini-pupillages, I met only two female barristers. Naturally, this begged the question: why?
During my two years at a commercial chancery set, I am pleased to say that I am yet to experience a rude awakening in answer to this question. My experience has been (and remains) overwhelmingly positive. My colleagues – barristers and clerks alike – have been supportive and inclusive. This is doubtless due in part to having a female senior clerk at chambers’ helm, the knock-on effect of which is remarkable.
Any preconception that being a successful barrister requires casting a spotlight on more ‘masculine’ characteristics of driving ambition and aggression, while supressing the typically ‘soft’ or ‘feminine’ characteristics of being sensitive and understanding, for example, has been extinguished. On the contrary, I have found that the latter are not only compatible with building a practice at the Commercial Chancery Bar, but positively complementary. Embracing these has proved valuable in forging relationships with professional clients and ensuring that lay clients feel heard and reassured.
An ability to be unapologetically oneself extends, in my experience, to the social side of the Bar. The present-day Commercial Chancery Bar is no longer an exclusive boys’ club, where discussion centres around cricket, rugby and the like. Indeed, I have enlightened my colleagues as to the latest drama in ‘Love Is Blind’, Taylor Swift lore, and why skinny jeans are no longer socially acceptable. Notwithstanding this, there is a respect for the work I do and my ability to do it.
It would be remiss of me, however, to elide the fact that much progress is yet to be achieved. Machismo remains a feature of the Commercial Chancery Bar. For example, marketing events are often male-oriented activities involving heavy inebriation into the small hours. This is more frequently to the exclusion of female clients or colleagues than their male counterparts due, for example, to having greater responsibilities at home. Further, that this area of the Bar is male-dominated means that there is great statistical probability of being the only woman in the room at times. In this respect, there are undeniably greater hurdles for women (even if more perceived than real) to meaningfully network or connect with clients, the majority of whom still tend to be male, sharing more in common with male colleagues.
For me personally, however, the most noticeable discrepancy between young male and female practitioners is a different one altogether. At 23/24 years old, I have at times looked on with envy at my junior male colleagues who are spoiled for choice with role models in whom they may see a reflection of themselves. Of course, I do look up to, learn from and at times lean on my senior male, as well as female, colleagues. However, it was not until I met a former female member of chambers last year that I truly considered the rather more tangible benefit and inspiration that I and my female colleagues would experience if we, too, had a chain of accomplished, brilliant female barristers across the breadth of seniority in chambers, whose lived experience might be more similar to our own.
While it goes without saying that the Commercial Chancery Bar has quite some way to go, I am heartened that in the last five years I have seen increasing numbers of women applying and being recruited to commercial chancery sets, including my own. I am hopeful that this trend will continue. I look forward to seeing articles like this one, which aim to shed light on disparities at the Bar, become increasingly unnecessary; to young women applying to the Commercial Chancery Bar without any doubt as to whether they will fit in; and to hearing more Taylor Swift in chambers’ corridors.
Kirsty Brimelow KC, Chair of the Bar, sets our course for 2026
What meaningful steps can you take in 2026 to advance your legal career? asks Thomas Cowan of St Pauls Chambers
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, explains why drugs may appear in test results, despite the donor denying use of them
Asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
AlphaBiolabs has donated £500 to The Christie Charity through its Giving Back initiative, helping to support cancer care, treatment and research across Greater Manchester, Cheshire and further afield
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today
With pupillage application season under way, Laura Wright reflects on her route to ‘tech barrister’ and offers advice for those aiming at a career at the Bar
Jury-less trial proposals threaten fairness, legitimacy and democracy without ending the backlog, writes Professor Cheryl Thomas KC (Hon), the UK’s leading expert on juries, judges and courts
Are you ready for the new way to do tax returns? David Southern KC explains the biggest change since HMRC launched self-assessment more than 30 years ago... and its impact on the Bar
Marking one year since a Bar disciplinary tribunal dismissed all charges against her, Dr Charlotte Proudman discusses the experience, her formative years and next steps. Interview by Anthony Inglese CB