*/
Some five years ago, as a law student with a penchant for trusts law and, admittedly, the sound of my own voice, I set my sights on a career at the Commercial Chancery Bar. I undertook a number of mini-pupillages at leading sets in Lincoln’s Inn. While each one served to confirm my career aspirations, women were conspicuous by their relative absence. I still recall that over the course of five commercial chancery mini-pupillages, I met only two female barristers. Naturally, this begged the question: why?
During my two years at a commercial chancery set, I am pleased to say that I am yet to experience a rude awakening in answer to this question. My experience has been (and remains) overwhelmingly positive. My colleagues – barristers and clerks alike – have been supportive and inclusive. This is doubtless due in part to having a female senior clerk at chambers’ helm, the knock-on effect of which is remarkable.
Any preconception that being a successful barrister requires casting a spotlight on more ‘masculine’ characteristics of driving ambition and aggression, while supressing the typically ‘soft’ or ‘feminine’ characteristics of being sensitive and understanding, for example, has been extinguished. On the contrary, I have found that the latter are not only compatible with building a practice at the Commercial Chancery Bar, but positively complementary. Embracing these has proved valuable in forging relationships with professional clients and ensuring that lay clients feel heard and reassured.
An ability to be unapologetically oneself extends, in my experience, to the social side of the Bar. The present-day Commercial Chancery Bar is no longer an exclusive boys’ club, where discussion centres around cricket, rugby and the like. Indeed, I have enlightened my colleagues as to the latest drama in ‘Love Is Blind’, Taylor Swift lore, and why skinny jeans are no longer socially acceptable. Notwithstanding this, there is a respect for the work I do and my ability to do it.
It would be remiss of me, however, to elide the fact that much progress is yet to be achieved. Machismo remains a feature of the Commercial Chancery Bar. For example, marketing events are often male-oriented activities involving heavy inebriation into the small hours. This is more frequently to the exclusion of female clients or colleagues than their male counterparts due, for example, to having greater responsibilities at home. Further, that this area of the Bar is male-dominated means that there is great statistical probability of being the only woman in the room at times. In this respect, there are undeniably greater hurdles for women (even if more perceived than real) to meaningfully network or connect with clients, the majority of whom still tend to be male, sharing more in common with male colleagues.
For me personally, however, the most noticeable discrepancy between young male and female practitioners is a different one altogether. At 23/24 years old, I have at times looked on with envy at my junior male colleagues who are spoiled for choice with role models in whom they may see a reflection of themselves. Of course, I do look up to, learn from and at times lean on my senior male, as well as female, colleagues. However, it was not until I met a former female member of chambers last year that I truly considered the rather more tangible benefit and inspiration that I and my female colleagues would experience if we, too, had a chain of accomplished, brilliant female barristers across the breadth of seniority in chambers, whose lived experience might be more similar to our own.
While it goes without saying that the Commercial Chancery Bar has quite some way to go, I am heartened that in the last five years I have seen increasing numbers of women applying and being recruited to commercial chancery sets, including my own. I am hopeful that this trend will continue. I look forward to seeing articles like this one, which aim to shed light on disparities at the Bar, become increasingly unnecessary; to young women applying to the Commercial Chancery Bar without any doubt as to whether they will fit in; and to hearing more Taylor Swift in chambers’ corridors.
Some five years ago, as a law student with a penchant for trusts law and, admittedly, the sound of my own voice, I set my sights on a career at the Commercial Chancery Bar. I undertook a number of mini-pupillages at leading sets in Lincoln’s Inn. While each one served to confirm my career aspirations, women were conspicuous by their relative absence. I still recall that over the course of five commercial chancery mini-pupillages, I met only two female barristers. Naturally, this begged the question: why?
During my two years at a commercial chancery set, I am pleased to say that I am yet to experience a rude awakening in answer to this question. My experience has been (and remains) overwhelmingly positive. My colleagues – barristers and clerks alike – have been supportive and inclusive. This is doubtless due in part to having a female senior clerk at chambers’ helm, the knock-on effect of which is remarkable.
Any preconception that being a successful barrister requires casting a spotlight on more ‘masculine’ characteristics of driving ambition and aggression, while supressing the typically ‘soft’ or ‘feminine’ characteristics of being sensitive and understanding, for example, has been extinguished. On the contrary, I have found that the latter are not only compatible with building a practice at the Commercial Chancery Bar, but positively complementary. Embracing these has proved valuable in forging relationships with professional clients and ensuring that lay clients feel heard and reassured.
An ability to be unapologetically oneself extends, in my experience, to the social side of the Bar. The present-day Commercial Chancery Bar is no longer an exclusive boys’ club, where discussion centres around cricket, rugby and the like. Indeed, I have enlightened my colleagues as to the latest drama in ‘Love Is Blind’, Taylor Swift lore, and why skinny jeans are no longer socially acceptable. Notwithstanding this, there is a respect for the work I do and my ability to do it.
It would be remiss of me, however, to elide the fact that much progress is yet to be achieved. Machismo remains a feature of the Commercial Chancery Bar. For example, marketing events are often male-oriented activities involving heavy inebriation into the small hours. This is more frequently to the exclusion of female clients or colleagues than their male counterparts due, for example, to having greater responsibilities at home. Further, that this area of the Bar is male-dominated means that there is great statistical probability of being the only woman in the room at times. In this respect, there are undeniably greater hurdles for women (even if more perceived than real) to meaningfully network or connect with clients, the majority of whom still tend to be male, sharing more in common with male colleagues.
For me personally, however, the most noticeable discrepancy between young male and female practitioners is a different one altogether. At 23/24 years old, I have at times looked on with envy at my junior male colleagues who are spoiled for choice with role models in whom they may see a reflection of themselves. Of course, I do look up to, learn from and at times lean on my senior male, as well as female, colleagues. However, it was not until I met a former female member of chambers last year that I truly considered the rather more tangible benefit and inspiration that I and my female colleagues would experience if we, too, had a chain of accomplished, brilliant female barristers across the breadth of seniority in chambers, whose lived experience might be more similar to our own.
While it goes without saying that the Commercial Chancery Bar has quite some way to go, I am heartened that in the last five years I have seen increasing numbers of women applying and being recruited to commercial chancery sets, including my own. I am hopeful that this trend will continue. I look forward to seeing articles like this one, which aim to shed light on disparities at the Bar, become increasingly unnecessary; to young women applying to the Commercial Chancery Bar without any doubt as to whether they will fit in; and to hearing more Taylor Swift in chambers’ corridors.
Chair of the Bar finds common ground on legal services between our two jurisdictions, plus an update on jury trials
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Ever wondered what a pupillage is like at the CPS? This Q and A provides an insight into the training, experience and next steps
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today