*/
My Learned Friends is an anonymous group of mid-career barristers from different practice areas, chambers, locations and backgrounds. We use Twitter (@Learned_Friends) and LinkedIn as our platforms to present, consolidate and share information in relation to issues of diversity, retention and career progression currently impacting the Bar.
Our vision is that people who want to practise at the Bar are able to do so without restrictions due to their personal circumstances. We aim to foster an open and constructive discussion on these issues and help facilitate improved joined-up thinking between the Bar Council, specialist Bar associations (SBAs), Circuits and chambers to drive positive change across the Bar.
There has been a plethora of surveys and reports over the last few years, spearheaded predominantly by the Bar Council, Bar Standards Board and other SBAs, to identify the core concerns affecting mid-career barristers in deciding whether to stay at the Bar.
While it is beyond the scope of this article to address all these issues, there are a few key ones that, though often addressed, persistently stand out for their lack of sufficient progress in practice. The Bar Standards Board’s (BSB’s) most recent report, Diversity at the Bar 2020, published in January 2021, pulls together some of these strands and the statistics confirm that there is still much work to be done.
The report reaffirms that both the pervasive issue of attrition in female practitioners at mid-career level, and a lack of female QCs proportionate to those practising at the Bar, continue to be a problem. This is echoed in another recent review of key factors affecting the retention of women at the Bar, presented by Professor Jo Delahunty QC in her article for Counsel magazine, ‘Women at the Bar in 2020’, and is worth reading.
The figures in the BSB report relating to Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) barristers demonstrate a continued lack of representation compared to the UK working population, as well as a significant disparity between the overall number of BAME barristers compared to BAME QCs. When the statistics are broken down further between different minority ethnic groups, greater disparity is also identified (see ‘Changing the picture: diversity at silk level’, Barbara Mills QC, Counsel, July 2021). The retention of BAME barristers at the middle and senior levels of the profession is crucial if the Bar is to make good on its stated ambition to become a diverse profession reflective of the society it serves.
Care responsibilities are another issue. The findings across most reports are broadly agreed. Demanding hours at (for many) low rates of pay, last minute instructions, changeable diaries and inflexible listing practices render a career at the Bar at best unattractive, and at worst unfeasible, for practitioners with care responsibilities.
Another factor is pay. Adequate funding for publicly funded practitioners and an adjustment to the working practices of courts to allow for a better work-life balance will go some way to resolving the issue of retention and career progression at the Bar for those practitioners and groups who are most affected by an entrenched, and increasingly unacceptable, mentality of ‘business as usual’. It says a lot when it takes a global pandemic to make things shift.
Current discourse appears to be focused on lockdown-driven changes such as remote hearings and the impact this has had on the work-life balance of practitioners. Discussions with HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) and the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) are now centred around whether, and to what extent, some remote hearings should continue as the new normal. My Learned Friends ran a recent poll on Twitter, and the results indicate that a majority of practitioners would prefer that remote hearings continue, as it allows them more time (otherwise spent travelling to and from and waiting at court) to spend with their family (twitter.com/Learned_Friends). This is particularly likely to be the case for those who have care responsibilities.
There is now an ample archive of empirical evidence to substantiate the validity of problems that adversely impact the retention and career progression of mid-career barristers.
The focus, we propose, must now be on formulating workable solutions to stem this attrition and make the Bar a feasible career of choice for all practitioners.
My Learned Friends provides a forum to discuss and promote these issues. Once we’ve identified workable solutions we will focus on encouraging those in power to implement them.
One of our recent tools for generating discussion has been our hashtag #tellusyourthree, where we have asked guest barristers to identify three challenges they experience at the Bar, three solutions they would offer to the Bar, and three asks they have for the Bar.
We have separately secured the support of a number of barrister influencers through a combination of our networks as well as cold-calling and explaining our mission. This includes some of the most popular legal influencers on Twitter, such as the Secret Barrister.
My Learned Friends will continue to create a space for barristers of all practice areas, regions, backgrounds and years of call to share resources, views, facts, and event information on matters related to career progression and retention at the Bar. The ultimate aim is to ensure transparency, improve diversity and inclusion, and secure better working lives for members of the Bar.
As part of our strategy we propose to:
We are not suggesting that we are the only ones seeking to find ways to improve the retention and career progression of mid-career barristers in order to promote a diverse Bar. On the contrary. But we are here to work with you by providing you with a platform to make your voices heard.
My Learned Friends is an anonymous group of mid-career barristers from different practice areas, chambers, locations and backgrounds. We use Twitter (@Learned_Friends) and LinkedIn as our platforms to present, consolidate and share information in relation to issues of diversity, retention and career progression currently impacting the Bar.
Our vision is that people who want to practise at the Bar are able to do so without restrictions due to their personal circumstances. We aim to foster an open and constructive discussion on these issues and help facilitate improved joined-up thinking between the Bar Council, specialist Bar associations (SBAs), Circuits and chambers to drive positive change across the Bar.
There has been a plethora of surveys and reports over the last few years, spearheaded predominantly by the Bar Council, Bar Standards Board and other SBAs, to identify the core concerns affecting mid-career barristers in deciding whether to stay at the Bar.
While it is beyond the scope of this article to address all these issues, there are a few key ones that, though often addressed, persistently stand out for their lack of sufficient progress in practice. The Bar Standards Board’s (BSB’s) most recent report, Diversity at the Bar 2020, published in January 2021, pulls together some of these strands and the statistics confirm that there is still much work to be done.
The report reaffirms that both the pervasive issue of attrition in female practitioners at mid-career level, and a lack of female QCs proportionate to those practising at the Bar, continue to be a problem. This is echoed in another recent review of key factors affecting the retention of women at the Bar, presented by Professor Jo Delahunty QC in her article for Counsel magazine, ‘Women at the Bar in 2020’, and is worth reading.
The figures in the BSB report relating to Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) barristers demonstrate a continued lack of representation compared to the UK working population, as well as a significant disparity between the overall number of BAME barristers compared to BAME QCs. When the statistics are broken down further between different minority ethnic groups, greater disparity is also identified (see ‘Changing the picture: diversity at silk level’, Barbara Mills QC, Counsel, July 2021). The retention of BAME barristers at the middle and senior levels of the profession is crucial if the Bar is to make good on its stated ambition to become a diverse profession reflective of the society it serves.
Care responsibilities are another issue. The findings across most reports are broadly agreed. Demanding hours at (for many) low rates of pay, last minute instructions, changeable diaries and inflexible listing practices render a career at the Bar at best unattractive, and at worst unfeasible, for practitioners with care responsibilities.
Another factor is pay. Adequate funding for publicly funded practitioners and an adjustment to the working practices of courts to allow for a better work-life balance will go some way to resolving the issue of retention and career progression at the Bar for those practitioners and groups who are most affected by an entrenched, and increasingly unacceptable, mentality of ‘business as usual’. It says a lot when it takes a global pandemic to make things shift.
Current discourse appears to be focused on lockdown-driven changes such as remote hearings and the impact this has had on the work-life balance of practitioners. Discussions with HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) and the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) are now centred around whether, and to what extent, some remote hearings should continue as the new normal. My Learned Friends ran a recent poll on Twitter, and the results indicate that a majority of practitioners would prefer that remote hearings continue, as it allows them more time (otherwise spent travelling to and from and waiting at court) to spend with their family (twitter.com/Learned_Friends). This is particularly likely to be the case for those who have care responsibilities.
There is now an ample archive of empirical evidence to substantiate the validity of problems that adversely impact the retention and career progression of mid-career barristers.
The focus, we propose, must now be on formulating workable solutions to stem this attrition and make the Bar a feasible career of choice for all practitioners.
My Learned Friends provides a forum to discuss and promote these issues. Once we’ve identified workable solutions we will focus on encouraging those in power to implement them.
One of our recent tools for generating discussion has been our hashtag #tellusyourthree, where we have asked guest barristers to identify three challenges they experience at the Bar, three solutions they would offer to the Bar, and three asks they have for the Bar.
We have separately secured the support of a number of barrister influencers through a combination of our networks as well as cold-calling and explaining our mission. This includes some of the most popular legal influencers on Twitter, such as the Secret Barrister.
My Learned Friends will continue to create a space for barristers of all practice areas, regions, backgrounds and years of call to share resources, views, facts, and event information on matters related to career progression and retention at the Bar. The ultimate aim is to ensure transparency, improve diversity and inclusion, and secure better working lives for members of the Bar.
As part of our strategy we propose to:
We are not suggesting that we are the only ones seeking to find ways to improve the retention and career progression of mid-career barristers in order to promote a diverse Bar. On the contrary. But we are here to work with you by providing you with a platform to make your voices heard.
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
The long-running fee-paid judicial pensions saga continues. The current cut-off date for giving notice of election to join FPJPS is 31 March 2024, and that date now gives rise to a serious problem, warns HH John Platt