*/
2b84b316e5244d64b18db8bed7fed8a8.jpg?sfvrsn=4528b979_1)
Aidan: The English legal system has been at the forefront of crypto disputes for years – from the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce statement and developing case law, to the launch in 2021 of the Digital Dispute Resolution Rules. Consequently, in some international cases, it is clear that the UK has an edge over other jurisdictions and we have seen the result of that in action with successful client recoveries. CFAAR wants to ensure that this experience secures the UK as the preferred seat for crypto disputes and to help guide how the rest of the world approaches these disputes.
Nick: There have been, and will continue to be, a number of consultations from the likes of the Law Commission, the UK Treasury and the Financial Conduct Authority on how to deal with cryptoassets. CFAAR will bring together the leading names and their combined experience at the sharp end of crypto disputes and investigations to provide an authoritative, coordinated industry voice to guide the development of policy, legislation and regulation. In particular, there are unregulated crypto platforms which fall outside the existing financial services regulatory structure, who do not have a unified voice and CFAAR can have an influence on their behalf.
Aidan: Since its launch back in September, CFAAR has very quickly grown a global profile through its LinkedIn group, its events and media interest. We will soon be launching a website and already have a calendar of regular events planned for the coming months. One focus is the launch of ‘foreign chapters’ in the jurisdictions and offshore financial centres which are the home of the major exchanges and will be hubs for crypto cases. These foreign chapters will ensure that market leaders are working together and mean the momentum of CFAAR continues in a practical and meaningful way.
Aidan: As the mainstream progression of crypto continues, this sector is now dealing with wider issues, not just cybercrime or the stereotypical dark web-related crypto seizures. From civil asset recovery, contentious insolvency, commercial arbitration, deceased estates and the development of central bank digital currencies, cryptoassets are becoming more prevalent across multiple sectors. Changes to proceeds of crime legislation to make it easier to seize cryptoassets and which impose greater regulation upon virtual asset service providers is also expected in 2022. CFAAR members and their collective experiences will become an invaluable resource for industries navigating the challenges that this rapid evolution will inevitably produce. As it becomes easier to identify illicit or stolen crypto with greater use of blockchain analytic tools, enforcement activity will increase and we will hopefully see many more successful outcomes for victims in asset recovery cases.
Nick: At our official launch in September, Sir Geoffrey Vos rightly evangelised the need for ‘education, education, education’ about crypto. This applies from the victims of crypto fraud to the law-makers. CFAAR’s central ethos is about inclusivity and sharing information and best practice. Our founding members are experienced practitioners behind the landmark crypto judgments in the English courts; we want to break down misconceptions for clients, build best practice for investigations and guide the development for the future.
Nick Price is a disputes specialist at Osborne Clarke with expertise in cryptoassets and financial services regulation.
Aidan Larkin is the CEO of Asset Reality and a cryptocurrency investigator and asset manager providing solutions for the recovery, custody and realisation of seized crypto.
Aidan: The English legal system has been at the forefront of crypto disputes for years – from the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce statement and developing case law, to the launch in 2021 of the Digital Dispute Resolution Rules. Consequently, in some international cases, it is clear that the UK has an edge over other jurisdictions and we have seen the result of that in action with successful client recoveries. CFAAR wants to ensure that this experience secures the UK as the preferred seat for crypto disputes and to help guide how the rest of the world approaches these disputes.
Nick: There have been, and will continue to be, a number of consultations from the likes of the Law Commission, the UK Treasury and the Financial Conduct Authority on how to deal with cryptoassets. CFAAR will bring together the leading names and their combined experience at the sharp end of crypto disputes and investigations to provide an authoritative, coordinated industry voice to guide the development of policy, legislation and regulation. In particular, there are unregulated crypto platforms which fall outside the existing financial services regulatory structure, who do not have a unified voice and CFAAR can have an influence on their behalf.
Aidan: Since its launch back in September, CFAAR has very quickly grown a global profile through its LinkedIn group, its events and media interest. We will soon be launching a website and already have a calendar of regular events planned for the coming months. One focus is the launch of ‘foreign chapters’ in the jurisdictions and offshore financial centres which are the home of the major exchanges and will be hubs for crypto cases. These foreign chapters will ensure that market leaders are working together and mean the momentum of CFAAR continues in a practical and meaningful way.
Aidan: As the mainstream progression of crypto continues, this sector is now dealing with wider issues, not just cybercrime or the stereotypical dark web-related crypto seizures. From civil asset recovery, contentious insolvency, commercial arbitration, deceased estates and the development of central bank digital currencies, cryptoassets are becoming more prevalent across multiple sectors. Changes to proceeds of crime legislation to make it easier to seize cryptoassets and which impose greater regulation upon virtual asset service providers is also expected in 2022. CFAAR members and their collective experiences will become an invaluable resource for industries navigating the challenges that this rapid evolution will inevitably produce. As it becomes easier to identify illicit or stolen crypto with greater use of blockchain analytic tools, enforcement activity will increase and we will hopefully see many more successful outcomes for victims in asset recovery cases.
Nick: At our official launch in September, Sir Geoffrey Vos rightly evangelised the need for ‘education, education, education’ about crypto. This applies from the victims of crypto fraud to the law-makers. CFAAR’s central ethos is about inclusivity and sharing information and best practice. Our founding members are experienced practitioners behind the landmark crypto judgments in the English courts; we want to break down misconceptions for clients, build best practice for investigations and guide the development for the future.
Far-ranging month for the Chair of the Bar
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the most recent data on alcohol misuse in the UK, and the implications for alcohol testing in family proceedings
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how tailored financial planning can help barristers take control of their finances and plan with confidence
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Is the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office process fit for purpose? Women barristers’ experiences of bullying are not being reported or, if they are, they are not making it through the system, says Tana Adkin KC
Review by Daniel Barnett
Chair of the Bar reports back
