*/
2b84b316e5244d64b18db8bed7fed8a8.jpg?sfvrsn=4528b979_1)
Aidan: The English legal system has been at the forefront of crypto disputes for years – from the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce statement and developing case law, to the launch in 2021 of the Digital Dispute Resolution Rules. Consequently, in some international cases, it is clear that the UK has an edge over other jurisdictions and we have seen the result of that in action with successful client recoveries. CFAAR wants to ensure that this experience secures the UK as the preferred seat for crypto disputes and to help guide how the rest of the world approaches these disputes.
Nick: There have been, and will continue to be, a number of consultations from the likes of the Law Commission, the UK Treasury and the Financial Conduct Authority on how to deal with cryptoassets. CFAAR will bring together the leading names and their combined experience at the sharp end of crypto disputes and investigations to provide an authoritative, coordinated industry voice to guide the development of policy, legislation and regulation. In particular, there are unregulated crypto platforms which fall outside the existing financial services regulatory structure, who do not have a unified voice and CFAAR can have an influence on their behalf.
Aidan: Since its launch back in September, CFAAR has very quickly grown a global profile through its LinkedIn group, its events and media interest. We will soon be launching a website and already have a calendar of regular events planned for the coming months. One focus is the launch of ‘foreign chapters’ in the jurisdictions and offshore financial centres which are the home of the major exchanges and will be hubs for crypto cases. These foreign chapters will ensure that market leaders are working together and mean the momentum of CFAAR continues in a practical and meaningful way.
Aidan: As the mainstream progression of crypto continues, this sector is now dealing with wider issues, not just cybercrime or the stereotypical dark web-related crypto seizures. From civil asset recovery, contentious insolvency, commercial arbitration, deceased estates and the development of central bank digital currencies, cryptoassets are becoming more prevalent across multiple sectors. Changes to proceeds of crime legislation to make it easier to seize cryptoassets and which impose greater regulation upon virtual asset service providers is also expected in 2022. CFAAR members and their collective experiences will become an invaluable resource for industries navigating the challenges that this rapid evolution will inevitably produce. As it becomes easier to identify illicit or stolen crypto with greater use of blockchain analytic tools, enforcement activity will increase and we will hopefully see many more successful outcomes for victims in asset recovery cases.
Nick: At our official launch in September, Sir Geoffrey Vos rightly evangelised the need for ‘education, education, education’ about crypto. This applies from the victims of crypto fraud to the law-makers. CFAAR’s central ethos is about inclusivity and sharing information and best practice. Our founding members are experienced practitioners behind the landmark crypto judgments in the English courts; we want to break down misconceptions for clients, build best practice for investigations and guide the development for the future.
Nick Price is a disputes specialist at Osborne Clarke with expertise in cryptoassets and financial services regulation.
Aidan Larkin is the CEO of Asset Reality and a cryptocurrency investigator and asset manager providing solutions for the recovery, custody and realisation of seized crypto.
Aidan: The English legal system has been at the forefront of crypto disputes for years – from the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce statement and developing case law, to the launch in 2021 of the Digital Dispute Resolution Rules. Consequently, in some international cases, it is clear that the UK has an edge over other jurisdictions and we have seen the result of that in action with successful client recoveries. CFAAR wants to ensure that this experience secures the UK as the preferred seat for crypto disputes and to help guide how the rest of the world approaches these disputes.
Nick: There have been, and will continue to be, a number of consultations from the likes of the Law Commission, the UK Treasury and the Financial Conduct Authority on how to deal with cryptoassets. CFAAR will bring together the leading names and their combined experience at the sharp end of crypto disputes and investigations to provide an authoritative, coordinated industry voice to guide the development of policy, legislation and regulation. In particular, there are unregulated crypto platforms which fall outside the existing financial services regulatory structure, who do not have a unified voice and CFAAR can have an influence on their behalf.
Aidan: Since its launch back in September, CFAAR has very quickly grown a global profile through its LinkedIn group, its events and media interest. We will soon be launching a website and already have a calendar of regular events planned for the coming months. One focus is the launch of ‘foreign chapters’ in the jurisdictions and offshore financial centres which are the home of the major exchanges and will be hubs for crypto cases. These foreign chapters will ensure that market leaders are working together and mean the momentum of CFAAR continues in a practical and meaningful way.
Aidan: As the mainstream progression of crypto continues, this sector is now dealing with wider issues, not just cybercrime or the stereotypical dark web-related crypto seizures. From civil asset recovery, contentious insolvency, commercial arbitration, deceased estates and the development of central bank digital currencies, cryptoassets are becoming more prevalent across multiple sectors. Changes to proceeds of crime legislation to make it easier to seize cryptoassets and which impose greater regulation upon virtual asset service providers is also expected in 2022. CFAAR members and their collective experiences will become an invaluable resource for industries navigating the challenges that this rapid evolution will inevitably produce. As it becomes easier to identify illicit or stolen crypto with greater use of blockchain analytic tools, enforcement activity will increase and we will hopefully see many more successful outcomes for victims in asset recovery cases.
Nick: At our official launch in September, Sir Geoffrey Vos rightly evangelised the need for ‘education, education, education’ about crypto. This applies from the victims of crypto fraud to the law-makers. CFAAR’s central ethos is about inclusivity and sharing information and best practice. Our founding members are experienced practitioners behind the landmark crypto judgments in the English courts; we want to break down misconceptions for clients, build best practice for investigations and guide the development for the future.
Chair of the Bar sets out a busy calendar for the rest of the year
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal Profession’s Exacting Standards
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Examined by Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
Time is precious for barristers. Every moment spent chasing paperwork, organising diaries, or managing admin is time taken away from what matters most: preparation, advocacy and your clients. That’s where Eden Assistants step in
AlphaBiolabs has announced its latest Giving Back donation to RAY Ceredigion, a grassroots West Wales charity that provides play, learning and community opportunities for families across Ceredigion County
Despite increased awareness, why are AI hallucinations continuing to infiltrate court cases at an alarming rate? Matthew Lee investigates
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act is an assault on the English language and on civil liberties, argues Paul Harris SC, founder of the Bar Human Rights Committee
Come in with your eyes open, but don’t let fear cloud the prospect. A view from practice by John Dove
Anon Academic explains why he’s leaving the world of English literature for the Bar – after all, the two are not as far apart as they may first seem...
Review by Stephen Cragg KC
