Whilst most types of legal services remain forbidden, acting in arbitration and ‘fly-in, fly-out’ advisory services has now been permitted explicitly by the Court. More details are available at:
http://www.legallyindia.com/201202212589/Law-firms/chennai-writ-allows-f....
So far as it relates to arbitration, the decision only establishes that foreign lawyers are permitted to act in international arbitrations, as defined under the Indian Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 (at least one party must be non-Indian); the decision does not specifically address the question of rights of audience in Indian domestic arbitrations, but the effect of the decision is that it would not be permissible for a non-Indian lawyer to appear in a domestic arbitration.
Anyone planning to appear in an Indian domestic arbitration should therefore seek a specific direction from the Tribunal under section 32 of the Advocates Act at the outset of an appearance in any given case. Section 32 authorises “any court, authority or person [to] permit any person, not enrolled as an advocate under this Act, to appear before it or him in any particular case”.
Home >
News >
India moves (a little) on legal services
India moves (a little) on legal services
Date: 30 April 2012
Whilst most types of legal services remain forbidden, acting in arbitration and ‘fly-in, fly-out’ advisory services has now been permitted explicitly by the Court. More details are available at:
http://www.legallyindia.com/201202212589/Law-firms/chennai-writ-allows-f....
So far as it relates to arbitration, the decision only establishes that foreign lawyers are permitted to act in international arbitrations, as defined under the Indian Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 (at least one party must be non-Indian); the decision does not specifically address the question of rights of audience in Indian domestic arbitrations, but the effect of the decision is that it would not be permissible for a non-Indian lawyer to appear in a domestic arbitration.
Anyone planning to appear in an Indian domestic arbitration should therefore seek a specific direction from the Tribunal under section 32 of the Advocates Act at the outset of an appearance in any given case. Section 32 authorises “any court, authority or person [to] permit any person, not enrolled as an advocate under this Act, to appear before it or him in any particular case”.
There is good news in the Chennai case brought to stop 31 law firms from undertaking any kind of legal work in India: AK Balaji v The Government of India, Ashurst LLP, White & Case et al (WP5614/2010)).
SourceURL:
Links: