*/
Lord Steyn, a former Lord of Appeal in Ordinary, has called for the identity card scheme to be abandoned.
Speaking at the Farrer’s Building second biennial lecture in memory of Lord Williams of Mostyn, Lord Steyn highlighted the lack of evidence that a National Identity Register – which will store geographical information, biometric data and administrative data linked to the use of ID cards – will serve to combat serious crime, and expressed concerns about the privacy implications for members of the public given the series of security leaks which have occurred.
“In my view a national identity card system is not necessary in our country. No further money should be spent on it. The idea should be abandoned,” he said.
Lord Steyn questioned whether the government’s competence in running an identity card system had been demonstrated, citing numerous data losses since May 2007 – including the well-publicised loss of two discs of child benefit data lost by HM Revenue & Customs which affected 25 million individuals; the loss of details of 3 million driving test candidates, including names, addresses and telephone numbers; and the theft of a laptop which contained the names, addresses and bank details of 10,000 National Health Service employees. Such instances, he said, “legitimately prompt the question whether the British public should have confidence in the scheme the government proposes to introduce”. He also queried whether “as we head into what may be a prolonged economic downturn, this is an opportune time for the introduction of an ID card scheme.”
Lord Steyn went on to say that successive UK governments had constructed one of the most comprehensive and technologically advanced systems in the world. “The Home Office proudly asserts that comprehensive surveillance has become routine,” he said. “If that is true, the resemblance to the world of Kafka is no longer so very distant.” He referred to the estimated 4.2 million CCTV cameras in operation in the UK. “It is said that a person living and working in London is likely to be filmed about 300 times on an average day,” he said.
Lord Steyn also said that there was “little hope of the Executive taking action to counter the excesses of the surveillance society. On the contrary, the state relentlessly acts to extend surveillance practices and to diminish correspondingly our civil liberties.”
Speaking at the Farrer’s Building second biennial lecture in memory of Lord Williams of Mostyn, Lord Steyn highlighted the lack of evidence that a National Identity Register – which will store geographical information, biometric data and administrative data linked to the use of ID cards – will serve to combat serious crime, and expressed concerns about the privacy implications for members of the public given the series of security leaks which have occurred.
“In my view a national identity card system is not necessary in our country. No further money should be spent on it. The idea should be abandoned,” he said.
Lord Steyn questioned whether the government’s competence in running an identity card system had been demonstrated, citing numerous data losses since May 2007 – including the well-publicised loss of two discs of child benefit data lost by HM Revenue & Customs which affected 25 million individuals; the loss of details of 3 million driving test candidates, including names, addresses and telephone numbers; and the theft of a laptop which contained the names, addresses and bank details of 10,000 National Health Service employees. Such instances, he said, “legitimately prompt the question whether the British public should have confidence in the scheme the government proposes to introduce”. He also queried whether “as we head into what may be a prolonged economic downturn, this is an opportune time for the introduction of an ID card scheme.”
Lord Steyn went on to say that successive UK governments had constructed one of the most comprehensive and technologically advanced systems in the world. “The Home Office proudly asserts that comprehensive surveillance has become routine,” he said. “If that is true, the resemblance to the world of Kafka is no longer so very distant.” He referred to the estimated 4.2 million CCTV cameras in operation in the UK. “It is said that a person living and working in London is likely to be filmed about 300 times on an average day,” he said.
Lord Steyn also said that there was “little hope of the Executive taking action to counter the excesses of the surveillance society. On the contrary, the state relentlessly acts to extend surveillance practices and to diminish correspondingly our civil liberties.”
Lord Steyn, a former Lord of Appeal in Ordinary, has called for the identity card scheme to be abandoned.
As we look ahead to Justice Week 2022, the sustainability of the Criminal Bar remains a critical issue for the government to address
Opportunity for female sopranos/contraltos in secondary education, or who have recently finished secondary education but have not yet begun tertiary education. Eligibility includes children of members of the Bar
Fear of the collection and test process is a common factor among clients, especially among vulnerable adults in complex family law cases. Cansford Laboratories shares some tips to help the testing process run as smoothly as possible
Casey Randall explains how complex relationship DNA tests can best be used – and interpreted – by counsel
Casey Randall, Head of DNA at AlphaBiolabs, explores what barristers need to know about DNA testing for immigration, including when a client might wish to submit DNA evidence, and which relationship tests are best for immigration applications
Julian Morgan reminds barristers of the top five areas to consider before 5 April
Barristers are particularly at risk of burnout because of the nature of our work and our approach to it but it doesnt have to be this way. Jade Bucklow explores how culture, work and lifestyle changes can rejuvinate our mental health...
The case ofR v Brecanihas complicated matters for defence lawyers. Emma Fielding talks to gang culture expert, Dr Simon Harding about County Lines, exploitation and modern slavery
If the Bar cannot define and prohibit bullying behaviour, what chance do we have of persuading the Judiciary to do so? Darren Howe QC and Professor Jo Delahunty QC's call to action on codification plus suggested strategies for dealing with bullying from the Bar and Bench
The Schools Consent Project (SCP) is educating tens of thousands of teenagers about the law around consent to challenge and change what is now endemic behaviour. Here, its founder, barrister Kate Parker talks to Chris Henley QC about SCPs work and its association with Jodie Comers West End playPrima Facie, in which she plays a criminal barrister who is sexually assaulted
Professionally embarrassed? The circumstances in which criminal barristers may return instructions to appear at trial have become clearer following the Court of Appeal judgment inR v Daniels By Abigail Bright