*/
Employed Barristers’ Committee and Western Circuit Women’s Forum
In days gone by, jobs were offered on the basis of connections, education, being a ‘good egg’, and with a ‘tap on the shoulder’. Little was transparent or fair about these processes. Today, competency-based selection helps encourage diversity and fairness and is used in a variety of recruitment processes involving members of the Bar. However, many barristers (who may well be very good) struggle to complete competency-based applications. Seeking to demystify the process, the three excellent speakers in this session provided clear guidance on how the process works.
Kate Brunner QC, who spoke about JAC applications, had a very clear message: ‘preparation’. Too many of us leave applications to the last minute – a fatal error. Competency-based applications depend on examples of things you have done; and the earlier you start thinking about these the better. Do your research. Consider what the competency is looking for and how you can provide an example that meets it, and remember to turn it into a story about what you did. Brunner explained how to do this by using the acronym SOAR – Situation, Objective, Action, Result (also known as STAR where the ‘T’ stands for task) – your example should meet each of these criteria.
Susanna McGibbon from the Government Legal Department, who runs the Attorney General’s list of Panel counsel selection process, echoed this advice. She emphasised the importance of a strong, evidence-based application with examples showing insight into issues which are likely to come the government’s way. Select your referees wisely. Describing references from the judiciary as the ‘crown jewels’, she injected a note of caution: if you do ask a judge to be a referee make sure it’s one who knows you well and (more importantly) one whom you’ve impressed. Remember to record achievements and store for later use as competency examples.
The final speaker, Maggie Semple OBE FCGI is a lay commissioner on the QC Appointments Panel, and gave an insightful talk on what the panel looks for: values, behaviour and decision-making. Lay members, although paired with a practitioner commissioner, don’t know who you are and this is why it is so important that you provide a strong application. The Panel looks for evidence of advocacy (both written and oral) in substantial cases. Select your eight judicial assessors carefully, and make sure the assessor knows you and can speak to your best work. Evidence from QCs and previous opponents is also valuable. Think carefully about how to demonstrate you meet the competencies, be authentic, avoid the appearance of having being coached and remember – there are no trick questions! ●
Called to the Bar in 1994, Michael Jennings is Director of Legal Services at the Health and Safety Executive. He has worked for the CPS, Attorney General, Home Office and MOJ.
In days gone by, jobs were offered on the basis of connections, education, being a ‘good egg’, and with a ‘tap on the shoulder’. Little was transparent or fair about these processes. Today, competency-based selection helps encourage diversity and fairness and is used in a variety of recruitment processes involving members of the Bar. However, many barristers (who may well be very good) struggle to complete competency-based applications. Seeking to demystify the process, the three excellent speakers in this session provided clear guidance on how the process works.
Kate Brunner QC, who spoke about JAC applications, had a very clear message: ‘preparation’. Too many of us leave applications to the last minute – a fatal error. Competency-based applications depend on examples of things you have done; and the earlier you start thinking about these the better. Do your research. Consider what the competency is looking for and how you can provide an example that meets it, and remember to turn it into a story about what you did. Brunner explained how to do this by using the acronym SOAR – Situation, Objective, Action, Result (also known as STAR where the ‘T’ stands for task) – your example should meet each of these criteria.
Susanna McGibbon from the Government Legal Department, who runs the Attorney General’s list of Panel counsel selection process, echoed this advice. She emphasised the importance of a strong, evidence-based application with examples showing insight into issues which are likely to come the government’s way. Select your referees wisely. Describing references from the judiciary as the ‘crown jewels’, she injected a note of caution: if you do ask a judge to be a referee make sure it’s one who knows you well and (more importantly) one whom you’ve impressed. Remember to record achievements and store for later use as competency examples.
The final speaker, Maggie Semple OBE FCGI is a lay commissioner on the QC Appointments Panel, and gave an insightful talk on what the panel looks for: values, behaviour and decision-making. Lay members, although paired with a practitioner commissioner, don’t know who you are and this is why it is so important that you provide a strong application. The Panel looks for evidence of advocacy (both written and oral) in substantial cases. Select your eight judicial assessors carefully, and make sure the assessor knows you and can speak to your best work. Evidence from QCs and previous opponents is also valuable. Think carefully about how to demonstrate you meet the competencies, be authentic, avoid the appearance of having being coached and remember – there are no trick questions! ●
Employed Barristers’ Committee and Western Circuit Women’s Forum
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
Developing a tech start-up demands a different definition of excellence to the Bar, says Saara Idelbi. The co-creator of Advocatr on entrepreneurship, AI advocacy training, and matching the thrill of a killer cross-examination
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
