*/
As a result of cases referred to the BSB for consideration recently, it has come to our attention that there appears to be a gap in the understanding of the relationship between the regulatory scheme overseen by the Office of the Immigration Commissioner (OISC) and the Code of Conduct of the Bar of England and Wales (the Code of Conduct).
This appears to be in relation to both the knowledge of barristers and those immigration advisers seeking to instruct them.It appears that it is thought that if an immigration adviser is accredited to Level 2 or 3 by the OISC, that is sufficient for them to be entitled to instruct a barrister (for advice or to attend court). That of course is not the only requirement. An immigration adviser seeking to instruct counsel must:
a) Be registered to Level 2 or 3 by the OISC (depending on whether it includes an instruction to appear at a hearing); AND
b) Be a Licensed Access Client within the meaning of paragraph 401 and Annex F1 of the Code of Conduct. It is noted that the OISC website does state, under the heading “OISC Level 3: Advocacy and Representation” that work permitted at Level 3 includes:
This appears to be in relation to both the knowledge of barristers and those immigration advisers seeking to instruct them.It appears that it is thought that if an immigration adviser is accredited to Level 2 or 3 by the OISC, that is sufficient for them to be entitled to instruct a barrister (for advice or to attend court). That of course is not the only requirement. An immigration adviser seeking to instruct counsel must:
a) Be registered to Level 2 or 3 by the OISC (depending on whether it includes an instruction to appear at a hearing); AND
b) Be a Licensed Access Client within the meaning of paragraph 401 and Annex F1 of the Code of Conduct. It is noted that the OISC website does state, under the heading “OISC Level 3: Advocacy and Representation” that work permitted at Level 3 includes:
As a result of cases referred to the BSB for consideration recently, it has come to our attention that there appears to be a gap in the understanding of the relationship between the regulatory scheme overseen by the Office of the Immigration Commissioner (OISC) and the Code of Conduct of the Bar of England and Wales (the Code of Conduct).
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
Responding to criticism on the narrow profile of government-instructed counsel, Mel Nebhrajani CB describes the system-wide change at GLD to drive fairer distribution of work and broader development of talent
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
