*/
The government has “gone back on its word and resumed its attack on the criminal Bar” the new Criminal Bar Association (“CBA”) Chairman Paul Mendelle QC has warned.
In a letter to The Times , Mendelle, of 25 Bedford Row, accused the government of “spinning the facts” in its proposals to reduce fees for criminal defence work. The proposals were presented “as correcting an anomaly in order to bring defence fees into line with prosecution fees. They are nothing of the sort and the spin disguises a naked attempt by the government to go back on its word.
The government may be hoping the general public will have forgotten the facts, but the Bar certainly has not,” he wrote. “A government, apparently dissatisfied with its own independent review, has gone back on its word and resumed its attack on the criminal Bar by proposing to cut defence fees. Its actions will prevent many talented young people, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds or ethnic minorities, from becoming or remaining criminal barristers, with ultimate damage to the diversity of the judiciary.” He warned that although the government might suppose it was “simply inflicting pain on the few at the Bar” it was the criminal justice that would “suffer in the long run”.
The government may be hoping the general public will have forgotten the facts, but the Bar certainly has not,” he wrote. “A government, apparently dissatisfied with its own independent review, has gone back on its word and resumed its attack on the criminal Bar by proposing to cut defence fees. Its actions will prevent many talented young people, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds or ethnic minorities, from becoming or remaining criminal barristers, with ultimate damage to the diversity of the judiciary.” He warned that although the government might suppose it was “simply inflicting pain on the few at the Bar” it was the criminal justice that would “suffer in the long run”.
The government has “gone back on its word and resumed its attack on the criminal Bar” the new Criminal Bar Association (“CBA”) Chairman Paul Mendelle QC has warned.
In a letter to The Times, Mendelle, of 25 Bedford Row, accused the government of “spinning the facts” in its proposals to reduce fees for criminal defence work. The proposals were presented “as correcting an anomaly in order to bring defence fees into line with prosecution fees. They are nothing of the sort and the spin disguises a naked attempt by the government to go back on its word.
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
With automation now deeply embedded in the Department for Work Pensions, Alexander McColl and Alexa Thompson review what we know, what we don’t and avenues for legal challenge
Why were some Caribbean nations given such dramatically different constitutional frameworks when they gained independence from the UK? Dr Leonardo Raznovich examines the controversial savings clause
