*/
The Government has succumbed to concerted pressure from lawyers to ditch controversial new criminal legal aid contracts and suspend fee cuts.
Justice Secretary Michael Gove announced that the Government will not go ahead with the dual contracting arrangements for police station work and will suspend the second 8.75% fee cut, introduced last July, for 12 months from April.
In a written statement, he also said that he will ‘in due course’ appoint an advisory council of solicitors and barristers to help him explore ways to ‘reduce unnecessary bureaucratic costs, eliminate waste and end continuing abuses within the current legal aid system’.
Gove’s department faced almost 100 legal challenges from individual firms denied new contracts by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA), as well as a judicial review of the legality of the assessment process, following whistleblowing claims – denied by the LAA – that it was flawed.
He said: ‘My decision is driven in part by the recognition that the litigation will be time-consuming and costly for all parties, whatever the outcome.
‘I do not want my department and the legal aid market to face months if not years of continuing uncertainty and expensive litigation, while it is heard.’
In addition, he said he had been able to halt the plans, designed to cut the legal aid budget, due to ‘economies’ made elsewhere in the Ministry of Justice that had allowed him ‘greater flexibility’.
Welcoming the decision as the ‘right one’, Chairman of the Bar, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, said: ‘It shows that the Lord Chancellor has listened to the legal profession’s concerns about access to justice and is acting upon them.’
Having staved off challenges to the tender process, the Ministry could now face compensation claims from firms that have spent money preparing for the new contracts.
The Ministry also faces scrutiny over its handling of the whole affair. The Shadow Lord Chancellor, Lord Falconer, has asked the public spending watchdog, the National Audit Office, to investigate the debacle. The policy change, he said, had come ‘very late in the day’ and cost firms time and money.
Responding to a Parliamentary question from his Labour shadow, Andy Slaughter, the justice minister Shailesh Vara told the House of Commons that the LAA had, up to the end of December 2015, spent £141,519 on external legal fees associated with the contracts.
The Government has succumbed to concerted pressure from lawyers to ditch controversial new criminal legal aid contracts and suspend fee cuts.
Justice Secretary Michael Gove announced that the Government will not go ahead with the dual contracting arrangements for police station work and will suspend the second 8.75% fee cut, introduced last July, for 12 months from April.
In a written statement, he also said that he will ‘in due course’ appoint an advisory council of solicitors and barristers to help him explore ways to ‘reduce unnecessary bureaucratic costs, eliminate waste and end continuing abuses within the current legal aid system’.
Gove’s department faced almost 100 legal challenges from individual firms denied new contracts by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA), as well as a judicial review of the legality of the assessment process, following whistleblowing claims – denied by the LAA – that it was flawed.
He said: ‘My decision is driven in part by the recognition that the litigation will be time-consuming and costly for all parties, whatever the outcome.
‘I do not want my department and the legal aid market to face months if not years of continuing uncertainty and expensive litigation, while it is heard.’
In addition, he said he had been able to halt the plans, designed to cut the legal aid budget, due to ‘economies’ made elsewhere in the Ministry of Justice that had allowed him ‘greater flexibility’.
Welcoming the decision as the ‘right one’, Chairman of the Bar, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, said: ‘It shows that the Lord Chancellor has listened to the legal profession’s concerns about access to justice and is acting upon them.’
Having staved off challenges to the tender process, the Ministry could now face compensation claims from firms that have spent money preparing for the new contracts.
The Ministry also faces scrutiny over its handling of the whole affair. The Shadow Lord Chancellor, Lord Falconer, has asked the public spending watchdog, the National Audit Office, to investigate the debacle. The policy change, he said, had come ‘very late in the day’ and cost firms time and money.
Responding to a Parliamentary question from his Labour shadow, Andy Slaughter, the justice minister Shailesh Vara told the House of Commons that the LAA had, up to the end of December 2015, spent £141,519 on external legal fees associated with the contracts.
The Bar Council is ready to support a turn to the efficiencies that will make a difference
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
What meaningful steps can you take in 2026 to advance your legal career? asks Thomas Cowan of St Pauls Chambers
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, explains why drugs may appear in test results, despite the donor denying use of them
Ever wondered what a pupillage is like at the CPS? This Q and A provides an insight into the training, experience and next steps
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today
Ready for the new way to do tax returns? David Southern KC continues his series explaining the impact on barristers. In part 2, a worked example shows the specific practicalities of adapting to the new system
Resolution of the criminal justice crisis does not lie in reheating old ideas that have been roundly rejected before, say Ed Vickers KC, Faras Baloch and Katie Bacon
With pupillage application season under way, Laura Wright reflects on her route to ‘tech barrister’ and offers advice for those aiming at a career at the Bar
