*/
“Victims’ rights arrived late in the day” and have not been balanced or even considered when constructing the legal system, Sir Keir Starmer QC, former Director for Public Prosecutions, stated in a lecture at the Working Men’s College on 4 February.
The speech emphasised the points raised by him in a Guardian column the day before where he suggested retiring the phrase “criminal justice system” and replace it with “a criminal justice system fit for victims”.
During the lecture he conceded that there were good aspects of the present system: it is not corrupt, prosecutors are independent (he later said that during his five years in office he was never put under any pressure by any political party in respect of the hard decisions he had to take) and there are “relatively few miscarriages of justice”.
Nevertheless and for example, many victims do not feel able to make a complaint. When they do the system discounts it: under the old credibility tests “the more vulnerable the victim the less likely the prosecution” even though the number of prosecutions for false allegations are tiny compared to actual complaints.
He therefore supported a Victims’ Law which would put the changed attitude towards victims’ rights into statute. He is chairing a working party to advise the Labour Party what should be in such an Act, together with Baroness Lawrence and the former Chief Constable of Thames Valley, Peter Neyroud.
In reply to questions from the floor he said that the legal profession can be very difficult to persuade; they are “very conservative about change” but there is now more of a mood for change. This is not a “zero sum game” between defendants and victims. To those who complained that police officers are not successfully prosecuted he re-stated the law of self defence which is open to all defendants.
One innovation he championed was cameras in court. If we could protect victims and witnesses: “I’d have cameras in every court,” he said. That would “up the standards”.
During the lecture he conceded that there were good aspects of the present system: it is not corrupt, prosecutors are independent (he later said that during his five years in office he was never put under any pressure by any political party in respect of the hard decisions he had to take) and there are “relatively few miscarriages of justice”.
Nevertheless and for example, many victims do not feel able to make a complaint. When they do the system discounts it: under the old credibility tests “the more vulnerable the victim the less likely the prosecution” even though the number of prosecutions for false allegations are tiny compared to actual complaints.
He therefore supported a Victims’ Law which would put the changed attitude towards victims’ rights into statute. He is chairing a working party to advise the Labour Party what should be in such an Act, together with Baroness Lawrence and the former Chief Constable of Thames Valley, Peter Neyroud.
In reply to questions from the floor he said that the legal profession can be very difficult to persuade; they are “very conservative about change” but there is now more of a mood for change. This is not a “zero sum game” between defendants and victims. To those who complained that police officers are not successfully prosecuted he re-stated the law of self defence which is open to all defendants.
One innovation he championed was cameras in court. If we could protect victims and witnesses: “I’d have cameras in every court,” he said. That would “up the standards”.
“Victims’ rights arrived late in the day” and have not been balanced or even considered when constructing the legal system, Sir Keir Starmer QC, former Director for Public Prosecutions, stated in a lecture at the Working Men’s College on 4 February.
The speech emphasised the points raised by him in a Guardian column the day before where he suggested retiring the phrase “criminal justice system” and replace it with “a criminal justice system fit for victims”.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
