*/
A campaign of “mythbusting”, flexible working opportunities and more judicial job shadowing are some of the recommendations of Baroness Neuberger’s report into judicial diversity.
The final report of the Lord Chancellor’s Advisory Panel on Judicial Diversity, chaired by Baroness Neuberger, rejects the use of diversity quotas and targets for judicial appointments. Instead, there should be a “fundamental shift in approach” towards diversity at all stages of a judicial career.
The panel’s 53 recommendations include a proactive campaign of “mythbusting” to overcome false perceptions about the reality of becoming a judge, and the evolution of the Judicial Studies Board into a Judicial College to provide training for prospective judicial applicants. There should be more judicial job shadowing, law firms should encourage part-time service, and flexible working opportunities should be assumed for all judicial posts, with exceptions needing to be justified.
Judges should engage with schools and colleges to encourage students from under-represented groups, and the legal profession should actively promote judicial office among those currently not coming forward. Nick Green QC, Chairman of the Bar, said: “A vibrant and diverse Bar is very important to a vibrant and diverse judiciary. “Women and men enter the profession in equal numbers and nearly 20 per cent of pupil barristers come from visible ethnic minority backgrounds. We have implemented several schemes which educate young people who aspire to become barristers.
“The retention of diversity is a priority. To that end the Equality and Diversity Code and Maternity Leave Guidelines promote flexible working arrangements and career breaks from practice. “We run an annual seminar on ‘Managing Career Breaks’ and have appointed Diversity Mentors on every Circuit to assist career progression.”
The panel’s 53 recommendations include a proactive campaign of “mythbusting” to overcome false perceptions about the reality of becoming a judge, and the evolution of the Judicial Studies Board into a Judicial College to provide training for prospective judicial applicants. There should be more judicial job shadowing, law firms should encourage part-time service, and flexible working opportunities should be assumed for all judicial posts, with exceptions needing to be justified.
Judges should engage with schools and colleges to encourage students from under-represented groups, and the legal profession should actively promote judicial office among those currently not coming forward. Nick Green QC, Chairman of the Bar, said: “A vibrant and diverse Bar is very important to a vibrant and diverse judiciary. “Women and men enter the profession in equal numbers and nearly 20 per cent of pupil barristers come from visible ethnic minority backgrounds. We have implemented several schemes which educate young people who aspire to become barristers.
“The retention of diversity is a priority. To that end the Equality and Diversity Code and Maternity Leave Guidelines promote flexible working arrangements and career breaks from practice. “We run an annual seminar on ‘Managing Career Breaks’ and have appointed Diversity Mentors on every Circuit to assist career progression.”
A campaign of “mythbusting”, flexible working opportunities and more judicial job shadowing are some of the recommendations of Baroness Neuberger’s report into judicial diversity.
The final report of the Lord Chancellor’s Advisory Panel on Judicial Diversity, chaired by Baroness Neuberger, rejects the use of diversity quotas and targets for judicial appointments. Instead, there should be a “fundamental shift in approach” towards diversity at all stages of a judicial career.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
