*/
Diversity
Female judicial applicants are consistently being recommended above or in line with their levels, according to official statistics released by the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) in June.
The figures, which cover five selection exercises completed between October 2012 and March 2013, show that a third of the recommendations for appointment to the High Court (Queen’s Bench and Family Divisions) were female.
In total the JAC received 81 applications for the 14 positions; 67 from men and 14 from women. Women progressed particularly well in the High Court selection process – going from 17% of applications to 29% of those shortlisted for interview and 36% of those recommended (they make up 29% of the eligible pool). The results improve upon the three previous comparable High Court selections, where women made up 14, 23 and 15% respectively of those recommended.
In the most recent Court of Appeal selections, three of the 10 judges recommended were women; and 43% (21 in total) of the individuals authorised in 2012/13 to sit as a Deputy Judge of the High Court were female.
“Women should be encouraged by this and apply in greater numbers – when they do apply, they are achieving high levels of success,” said Christopher Stephens, Chairman of the JAC.
Further encouragement can be taken from the JAC’s annual report, published in July, which showed that black and minority ethnic candidates performed close to their eligible pool for legal posts – they were 7% of recommendations from 16% of applicants (compared to 6-10% of the eligible pool).
Welcoming the statistics, Lord Judge said that one of his long-held aspirations as Lord Chief Justice was coming to pass: “Increasing numbers of women are applying and being selected on merit for judicial office at every level of the judiciary, to great public advantage. I hope that women and other under-represented groups read these statistics and are encouraged to apply for the Bench. We need the best candidates for appointment. Anything else, such as sex, race, sexuality or socio-economic background, is irrelevant.”
The figures, which cover five selection exercises completed between October 2012 and March 2013, show that a third of the recommendations for appointment to the High Court (Queen’s Bench and Family Divisions) were female.
In total the JAC received 81 applications for the 14 positions; 67 from men and 14 from women. Women progressed particularly well in the High Court selection process – going from 17% of applications to 29% of those shortlisted for interview and 36% of those recommended (they make up 29% of the eligible pool). The results improve upon the three previous comparable High Court selections, where women made up 14, 23 and 15% respectively of those recommended.
In the most recent Court of Appeal selections, three of the 10 judges recommended were women; and 43% (21 in total) of the individuals authorised in 2012/13 to sit as a Deputy Judge of the High Court were female.
“Women should be encouraged by this and apply in greater numbers – when they do apply, they are achieving high levels of success,” said Christopher Stephens, Chairman of the JAC.
Further encouragement can be taken from the JAC’s annual report, published in July, which showed that black and minority ethnic candidates performed close to their eligible pool for legal posts – they were 7% of recommendations from 16% of applicants (compared to 6-10% of the eligible pool).
Welcoming the statistics, Lord Judge said that one of his long-held aspirations as Lord Chief Justice was coming to pass: “Increasing numbers of women are applying and being selected on merit for judicial office at every level of the judiciary, to great public advantage. I hope that women and other under-represented groups read these statistics and are encouraged to apply for the Bench. We need the best candidates for appointment. Anything else, such as sex, race, sexuality or socio-economic background, is irrelevant.”
Diversity
Female judicial applicants are consistently being recommended above or in line with their levels, according to official statistics released by the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) in June.
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
The long-running fee-paid judicial pensions saga continues. The current cut-off date for giving notice of election to join FPJPS is 31 March 2024, and that date now gives rise to a serious problem, warns HH John Platt