*/
A scheme for fixed fee “exceptional case contracts” has been agreed between Bar leaders and the Ministry of Justice, enabling six of the seven outstanding very high cost case (VHCC) trials to proceed.
The one-off special arrangement was confirmed in a joint statement issued by the Bar Council, Criminal Bar Association (CBA), Circuit Leaders and the Ministry of Justice on 7 July: “Arrangements have been put in place, under which self-employed barristers have been instructed to represent defendants in a number of VHCCs.
“Given that normal working relationships have been restored, the Government has confirmed that there is no need to expand the PDS further,” the statement confirmed. Discussions are to be resumed “as soon as possible” on alternatives to the VHCC and Advocates Graduated Fee Schemes, and the long-term future of criminal advocacy.
CBA Chairman, Nigel Lithman QC, said that the barristers concerned had “signalled their content with the outcome negotiated on their behalf and consider these fees to be appropriate and acceptable”. This was always “a commercial decision by those offered these cases” and is “not an issue on which the wider membership of the Criminal Bar can impose their views,” he said.
“But for the rest of the independent Criminal Bar,” Lithman added, “this agreement acknowledges that it remains vitally important that those most experienced and best placed to do this work continue to do so”, removing the need for PDS expansion, shoring up choice of representation and restoring confidence in the UK justice system.
The contracts comprise a brief fee and refreshers, avoiding the administrative requirements of the existing VHCC scheme.
“Given that normal working relationships have been restored, the Government has confirmed that there is no need to expand the PDS further,” the statement confirmed. Discussions are to be resumed “as soon as possible” on alternatives to the VHCC and Advocates Graduated Fee Schemes, and the long-term future of criminal advocacy.
CBA Chairman, Nigel Lithman QC, said that the barristers concerned had “signalled their content with the outcome negotiated on their behalf and consider these fees to be appropriate and acceptable”. This was always “a commercial decision by those offered these cases” and is “not an issue on which the wider membership of the Criminal Bar can impose their views,” he said.
“But for the rest of the independent Criminal Bar,” Lithman added, “this agreement acknowledges that it remains vitally important that those most experienced and best placed to do this work continue to do so”, removing the need for PDS expansion, shoring up choice of representation and restoring confidence in the UK justice system.
The contracts comprise a brief fee and refreshers, avoiding the administrative requirements of the existing VHCC scheme.
A scheme for fixed fee “exceptional case contracts” has been agreed between Bar leaders and the Ministry of Justice, enabling six of the seven outstanding very high cost case (VHCC) trials to proceed.
The one-off special arrangement was confirmed in a joint statement issued by the Bar Council, Criminal Bar Association (CBA), Circuit Leaders and the Ministry of Justice on 7 July: “Arrangements have been put in place, under which self-employed barristers have been instructed to represent defendants in a number of VHCCs.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
Responding to criticism on the narrow profile of government-instructed counsel, Mel Nebhrajani CB describes the system-wide change at GLD to drive fairer distribution of work and broader development of talent
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
