*/
The family courts are facing a ‘clear and imminent crisis’ because of the sustained increase in the number of child care cases, the Head of the Family Division warned.
In his latest View from the President’s Chambers, Sir James Munby said: ‘The fact is that we are approaching a crisis for which we are ill-prepared and where there is no clear strategy to manage the crisis. What is to be done?’
The number of cases has risen from around 6,500 in 2005/6 to about 15,000 this year, and Munby predicted that could climb to 25,000 by 2019/20.
He called for a national roll-out of the pioneering Family Drug and Alcohol Court (FDAC), which seeks to address the problems that lead to many care applications being made.
Munby said the FDAC and similar projects are ‘the best hope, indeed, in truth, the only hope, we have of bringing the system, the ever increasing numbers of care cases, under control’.
Meanwhile, a study found that 37% of FDAC mothers were reunited with their children at the end of proceedings, compared with 25% of mothers in ordinary proceedings, and they experienced significantly less family disruption after being reunited over the three years after proceedings ended – 51% compared with 22%.
The study also found that many more mothers who went through the FDAC stopped misusing substances at the end of proceedings (46% compared with 30%).
Despite these findings, funding for the FDAC is due to run out in 2017.
The family courts are facing a ‘clear and imminent crisis’ because of the sustained increase in the number of child care cases, the Head of the Family Division warned.
In his latest View from the President’s Chambers, Sir James Munby said: ‘The fact is that we are approaching a crisis for which we are ill-prepared and where there is no clear strategy to manage the crisis. What is to be done?’
The number of cases has risen from around 6,500 in 2005/6 to about 15,000 this year, and Munby predicted that could climb to 25,000 by 2019/20.
He called for a national roll-out of the pioneering Family Drug and Alcohol Court (FDAC), which seeks to address the problems that lead to many care applications being made.
Munby said the FDAC and similar projects are ‘the best hope, indeed, in truth, the only hope, we have of bringing the system, the ever increasing numbers of care cases, under control’.
Meanwhile, a study found that 37% of FDAC mothers were reunited with their children at the end of proceedings, compared with 25% of mothers in ordinary proceedings, and they experienced significantly less family disruption after being reunited over the three years after proceedings ended – 51% compared with 22%.
The study also found that many more mothers who went through the FDAC stopped misusing substances at the end of proceedings (46% compared with 30%).
Despite these findings, funding for the FDAC is due to run out in 2017.
Our call for sufficient resources for the justice system and for the Bar to scrutinise the BSB’s latest consultation
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses alcohol testing for the Family Court
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth explains how to make sure you are investing suitably, and in your long-term interests
In conversation with Matthew Bland, Lincoln’s Inn Library
Millicent Wild of 5 Essex Chambers describes her pupillage experience
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth explores some key steps to take when starting out as a barrister in order to secure your financial future
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
Expectations, experiences and survival tips – some of the things I wished I had known (or applied) when I was starting pupillage. By Chelsea Brooke-Ward
If you are in/about to start pupillage, you will soon be facing the pupillage stage assessment in professional ethics. Jane Hutton and Patrick Ryan outline exam format and tactics
In a two-part opinion series, James Onalaja considers the International Criminal Court Prosecutor’s requests for arrest warrants in the controversial Israel-Palestine situation