*/
Family law barristers have joined with the NSPCC to call for an urgent Parliamentary inquiry into the state of the family justice system. A coalition, including the Bar Council and Family Law Bar Association, have written to the chair of the House of Commons Justice Select Committee, Alan Beith MP, calling for an inquiry into the impact of repeated cuts in the family justice system.
The letter refers to The Work of the Family Bar, research commissioned by the Family Law Bar Association, and describes the profession as “close to breaking point as it struggles to cope with increasingly complex caseloads, the pressure to protect the interests of vulnerable clients, disruptive patterns of work and repeated cuts in pay.”
The “week-in-a-life” study, carried out by Dr Debora Price and Anne Laybourne of the King’s Institute for the Study of Public Policy, analysed data from 1,610 barristers in 133 chambers and involved 5,012 pieces of work, 40% of which was undertaken under legal aid graduated fees.
The respondents were specialists: 75% spent 75% of their time on family law; half (the more senior) particularly specialised in ancillary relief or public law [children] work. Half worked more than 46 hours a week, and a quarter more than 56 hours per week, with median taxable profits of £66,000. Half earned less than £39,000 on legal aid work, in which hourly gross rates are £57.
Speaking at the launch of the research last month, Desmond Browne QC, Chairman of the Bar, said: “Barristers are not asking for more money.” The concern is the impact of the “abhorrent” cuts by the Legal Services Commission of £6.5m in counsel’s fees in children’s cases, which have just taken effect. Further cuts of up to £20–30m (more than a 50% cut in many complex cases) are likely to follow, as a result of the consultation Family Legal Aid Funding from 2010 (December 2008). The last time the LSC imposed substantial changes in family legal aid, in 2001, 28% of the family Bar stopped doing publicly funded ancillary relief hearings, the research showed. It is common now for those above 15 years’ call to refuse legally aided work.
Chair of the Family Law Bar Association, Lucy Theis QC, pointed out that “expertise in family law is not gained overnight” and these cuts will “drive expertise away, which is not in the public interest”.
The letter refers to The Work of the Family Bar, research commissioned by the Family Law Bar Association, and describes the profession as “close to breaking point as it struggles to cope with increasingly complex caseloads, the pressure to protect the interests of vulnerable clients, disruptive patterns of work and repeated cuts in pay.”
The “week-in-a-life” study, carried out by Dr Debora Price and Anne Laybourne of the King’s Institute for the Study of Public Policy, analysed data from 1,610 barristers in 133 chambers and involved 5,012 pieces of work, 40% of which was undertaken under legal aid graduated fees.
The respondents were specialists: 75% spent 75% of their time on family law; half (the more senior) particularly specialised in ancillary relief or public law [children] work. Half worked more than 46 hours a week, and a quarter more than 56 hours per week, with median taxable profits of £66,000. Half earned less than £39,000 on legal aid work, in which hourly gross rates are £57.
Speaking at the launch of the research last month, Desmond Browne QC, Chairman of the Bar, said: “Barristers are not asking for more money.” The concern is the impact of the “abhorrent” cuts by the Legal Services Commission of £6.5m in counsel’s fees in children’s cases, which have just taken effect. Further cuts of up to £20–30m (more than a 50% cut in many complex cases) are likely to follow, as a result of the consultation Family Legal Aid Funding from 2010 (December 2008). The last time the LSC imposed substantial changes in family legal aid, in 2001, 28% of the family Bar stopped doing publicly funded ancillary relief hearings, the research showed. It is common now for those above 15 years’ call to refuse legally aided work.
Chair of the Family Law Bar Association, Lucy Theis QC, pointed out that “expertise in family law is not gained overnight” and these cuts will “drive expertise away, which is not in the public interest”.
Family law barristers have joined with the NSPCC to call for an urgent Parliamentary inquiry into the state of the family justice system. A coalition, including the Bar Council and Family Law Bar Association, have written to the chair of the House of Commons Justice Select Committee, Alan Beith MP, calling for an inquiry into the impact of repeated cuts in the family justice system.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
Unlocking your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step. By Philip N Bristow
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, discusses the upcoming changes to pensions and Inheritance Tax and the potential impact on your financial future
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
The Chief Legal Officer to the Metropolitan Police, barrister Brett Welch, tells Anthony Inglese CB about his mission and the work to turn the Met around
Barrister apprenticeships – shortly to provide the fourth pathway to the Bar – are an ideal opportunity to support local talent and ‘grow your own’, say Tim Coulson and Dr Jane Dennehy
Oliver Lewis spotlights an overlooked yet rapidly evolving area of law – coercive and controlling behaviour within care contexts
.tmb-carlisting.jpg?sfvrsn=9ca7ad96_1)
