*/
Constitutional law
The House of Lords EU Committee has launched an inquiry into the use of the United Kingdom opt-out from EU police and criminal justice measures and its potential implications for the UK. It will be conducted jointly by the EU Sub-Committee on Justice, Institutions and Consumer Protection and the EU Sub-Committee on Home Affairs, Health and Education.
Under Protocol 36 of the Treaty of Lisbon, the Government has until 31 May 2014 to decide if it wants the UK to continue with the 130 measures, which were enacted before the Lisbon Treaty came into force. The European Court of Justice will have jurisdiction over the measures after December 2014.
If it decides to opt out then the UK will be out of all the measures, which include: participation in Europol; the exchange of information on cross-border crime; mutual recognition of court judgments including pre-trial supervision orders, probation, custody and the recovery of fines; and the definition of offences and penalties for cross-border crimes, including terrorism and human trafficking.
It can apply to opt back in to individual measures, but this will be subject to the views of the European Commission and other Member States.
On 15 October 2012 the Home Secretary told Parliament that “the Government are clear that we do not need to remain bound by all the pre-Lisbon measures” and that their “current thinking” is that the UK should exercise the opt-out but negotiate to opt back in to individual measures. However the Government has said it will hold a debate and vote in each House before a decision is made.
The House of Lords EU Committee has called for written evidence, which should be submitted by 14 December. It will begin to hold public evidence sessions in January 2013, and expects to produce a report next May.
Under Protocol 36 of the Treaty of Lisbon, the Government has until 31 May 2014 to decide if it wants the UK to continue with the 130 measures, which were enacted before the Lisbon Treaty came into force. The European Court of Justice will have jurisdiction over the measures after December 2014.
If it decides to opt out then the UK will be out of all the measures, which include: participation in Europol; the exchange of information on cross-border crime; mutual recognition of court judgments including pre-trial supervision orders, probation, custody and the recovery of fines; and the definition of offences and penalties for cross-border crimes, including terrorism and human trafficking.
It can apply to opt back in to individual measures, but this will be subject to the views of the European Commission and other Member States.
On 15 October 2012 the Home Secretary told Parliament that “the Government are clear that we do not need to remain bound by all the pre-Lisbon measures” and that their “current thinking” is that the UK should exercise the opt-out but negotiate to opt back in to individual measures. However the Government has said it will hold a debate and vote in each House before a decision is made.
The House of Lords EU Committee has called for written evidence, which should be submitted by 14 December. It will begin to hold public evidence sessions in January 2013, and expects to produce a report next May.
Constitutional law
The House of Lords EU Committee has launched an inquiry into the use of the United Kingdom opt-out from EU police and criminal justice measures and its potential implications for the UK. It will be conducted jointly by the EU Sub-Committee on Justice, Institutions and Consumer Protection and the EU Sub-Committee on Home Affairs, Health and Education.
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
The long-running fee-paid judicial pensions saga continues. The current cut-off date for giving notice of election to join FPJPS is 31 March 2024, and that date now gives rise to a serious problem, warns HH John Platt
