*/
Most people would probably agree that establishing a mentoring scheme in chambers sounds like a good idea. There is no doubt that mentoring is a great way of giving something back, helping to address underrepresentation and inequalities in the profession, while improving chambers’ credentials as an inclusive, progressive and responsible organisation. It also makes chambers more attractive to applicants as they will get a sense that they will be supported through their career development.
But perhaps it also sounds like a lot of work for an already busy person to organise. And for that work to be worthwhile the scheme would need to be a success, rather than a tokenistic gesture. In my time as a barrister I certainly had ‘mentors’ who provided perhaps one coffee and one court visit – both beneficial in themselves but falling far short of what mentoring can offer.
However, there are a number of steps a chambers can take to make sure that their mentoring scheme is effective and provides demonstrable results.
First, you need to establish the purpose of the scheme including the definition of mentoring. People often have their own understanding of mentoring so it will undoubtedly help if both mentors and mentees share a view of what that will entail.
The definition I usually work with is that mentoring is a relationship (short- or long-term), usually between two people where:
If that definition is chosen, applicants to the scheme should also be encouraged to give some thought to whether it’s the right arrangement for them at that time, as opposed to say coaching or training. The prospective mentor should also reflect on whether they can really give the relationship the time, knowledge and experience needed.
Chambers will also want to consider whether the scheme is open to all or is designed for a specific group e.g. law students, returners to practice or those approaching an application for silk.
Finally, chambers will want to consider the broader structure of the scheme – how will confidentiality be managed, for example? Will there be somebody that mentors or mentees can turn to in the event of any problems?
Once these basic parameters are in place, you can turn to the matching of mentors and mentees.
Software is available and is used by larger organisations to match mentors and mentees. But, if you want to keep it simple, you can easily design an online form with a few key questions to allow prospective mentors and mentees to provide some basic information about the knowledge and experience of mentors and the goals of mentees. A neutral person can then carry out a matching exercise to put together suitable pairings.
In the world of coaching we use the word ‘contracting’ to mean agreeing the ground rules of the relationship at the outset to minimise any difficulties in the future. I recommend that the matched mentor and mentee agree their own arrangements at the outset around the parameters and boundaries they will respect including the following:
A significant factor in determining success or failure is how open the parties can be regarding their relationship. Honesty in communication throughout is vital. This can go a long way to preventing the mentoring relationship fading to an occasional chat.
Another key to successful mentoring is effective teaching. The mentee should be learning and, as both my own experience and various studies show, the mentor will also learn a lot and potentially even experience reduced stress levels.
Most people will recognise that learning tends to ‘stick’ more if the learner is involved rather than merely being lectured. So, for mentors to ensure that their mentees stay involved, I recommend the following approach:
This proverb sums up my passion for mentoring. A great mentor can save a keen mentee a lot of time and effort in achieving their goals by sharing some of their wisdom and providing support, encouragement and even introductions.
And, while a mentoring relationship might be for a specific task or time, in practical terms, if it’s a good quality one, and benefits both parties, it can last a lifetime and develop into a strong friendship.
Most people would probably agree that establishing a mentoring scheme in chambers sounds like a good idea. There is no doubt that mentoring is a great way of giving something back, helping to address underrepresentation and inequalities in the profession, while improving chambers’ credentials as an inclusive, progressive and responsible organisation. It also makes chambers more attractive to applicants as they will get a sense that they will be supported through their career development.
But perhaps it also sounds like a lot of work for an already busy person to organise. And for that work to be worthwhile the scheme would need to be a success, rather than a tokenistic gesture. In my time as a barrister I certainly had ‘mentors’ who provided perhaps one coffee and one court visit – both beneficial in themselves but falling far short of what mentoring can offer.
However, there are a number of steps a chambers can take to make sure that their mentoring scheme is effective and provides demonstrable results.
First, you need to establish the purpose of the scheme including the definition of mentoring. People often have their own understanding of mentoring so it will undoubtedly help if both mentors and mentees share a view of what that will entail.
The definition I usually work with is that mentoring is a relationship (short- or long-term), usually between two people where:
If that definition is chosen, applicants to the scheme should also be encouraged to give some thought to whether it’s the right arrangement for them at that time, as opposed to say coaching or training. The prospective mentor should also reflect on whether they can really give the relationship the time, knowledge and experience needed.
Chambers will also want to consider whether the scheme is open to all or is designed for a specific group e.g. law students, returners to practice or those approaching an application for silk.
Finally, chambers will want to consider the broader structure of the scheme – how will confidentiality be managed, for example? Will there be somebody that mentors or mentees can turn to in the event of any problems?
Once these basic parameters are in place, you can turn to the matching of mentors and mentees.
Software is available and is used by larger organisations to match mentors and mentees. But, if you want to keep it simple, you can easily design an online form with a few key questions to allow prospective mentors and mentees to provide some basic information about the knowledge and experience of mentors and the goals of mentees. A neutral person can then carry out a matching exercise to put together suitable pairings.
In the world of coaching we use the word ‘contracting’ to mean agreeing the ground rules of the relationship at the outset to minimise any difficulties in the future. I recommend that the matched mentor and mentee agree their own arrangements at the outset around the parameters and boundaries they will respect including the following:
A significant factor in determining success or failure is how open the parties can be regarding their relationship. Honesty in communication throughout is vital. This can go a long way to preventing the mentoring relationship fading to an occasional chat.
Another key to successful mentoring is effective teaching. The mentee should be learning and, as both my own experience and various studies show, the mentor will also learn a lot and potentially even experience reduced stress levels.
Most people will recognise that learning tends to ‘stick’ more if the learner is involved rather than merely being lectured. So, for mentors to ensure that their mentees stay involved, I recommend the following approach:
This proverb sums up my passion for mentoring. A great mentor can save a keen mentee a lot of time and effort in achieving their goals by sharing some of their wisdom and providing support, encouragement and even introductions.
And, while a mentoring relationship might be for a specific task or time, in practical terms, if it’s a good quality one, and benefits both parties, it can last a lifetime and develop into a strong friendship.
Kirsty Brimelow KC, Chair of the Bar, sets our course for 2026
What meaningful steps can you take in 2026 to advance your legal career? asks Thomas Cowan of St Pauls Chambers
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, explains why drugs may appear in test results, despite the donor denying use of them
Asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
AlphaBiolabs has donated £500 to The Christie Charity through its Giving Back initiative, helping to support cancer care, treatment and research across Greater Manchester, Cheshire and further afield
Q and A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today
With pupillage application season under way, Laura Wright reflects on her route to ‘tech barrister’ and offers advice for those aiming at a career at the Bar
Jury-less trial proposals threaten fairness, legitimacy and democracy without ending the backlog, writes Professor Cheryl Thomas KC (Hon), the UK’s leading expert on juries, judges and courts
Are you ready for the new way to do tax returns? David Southern KC explains the biggest change since HMRC launched self-assessment more than 30 years ago... and its impact on the Bar
Marking one year since a Bar disciplinary tribunal dismissed all charges against her, Dr Charlotte Proudman discusses the experience, her formative years and next steps. Interview by Anthony Inglese CB