*/
Just as there are different sorts of lawyers, namely solicitor, barrister, practising and non-practising, the lawyer who goes into accountancy or business or journalism or public administration, and academia, there are different types of lawyer-politician. There is the lawyer who sets out to be a professional lawyer, and somehow accidentally gets drawn into politics; and the lawyer who sets out to be a professional lawyer only insofar as this serves as an intentional or hopeful stepping-stone to politics.
When we debate who was the finest orator of all time, we think of Cicero and Demosthenes. When Cicero, a sort of Roman lawyer, spoke, the people said: ‘What a marvellous speaker!’ When Demosthenes spoke, a sort of Greek politician, the people said: ‘Let’s march!’ The winner was clear.
Lawyers, however, undoubtedly bring strengths to the office of PM. They are the power of analysis, relevance, logic, order, argument, advocacy, oratory, persuasion, balance and judgement. As a skilled negotiator they can promote peace. As a dynamic character they can give leadership in war. However, there can be damaging weaknesses. They may be, or at least seen to be, dull, boring, balanced, pedantic, petty, too intellectual, too clever, too much concerned with procedure and detail, perhaps lacking in leadership, charisma, passion. Asquith, for example, was first rate in peace time, a failure in war. Lloyd George was highly controversial in peace time, but a huge success in war.
And before the advent of the office of PM as we know it today, the Sovereign had the equivalent, namely the Lord Chancellor or the First Secretary. Thomas Beckett, a canon lawyer, enraged Henry II in 1170 by insisting upon the legal rights of the church, with unfortunate consequences. Thomas Cromwell, Gray’s Inn, made an error of judgement in selecting Anne of Cleves as a wife for Henry VIII and fell out of royal favour 1540 (a capital offence at the time). The Cecils, father and son, William Cecil, Lord Burghley and Robert Cecil, both of Gray’s Inn, were lawyers and highly successful principal ministers to Elizabeth I.
So, the candidates for consideration since Walpole became the first PM in 1721, ie in modern times, appear to be: Spencer Perceval, Henry Herbert Asquith, David Lloyd George, Clement Atlee, Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair. Sir Keir Starmer, Leader of the Labour Party and Leader of the Opposition, appears at the moment to be the only openly aspiring lawyer PM.
Spencer Perceval (PM 1809-1812) was a professional barrister of some standing. He was a son of the Earl of Egmont though he had to make his own way. He was a good debater, quick on his feet, displaying typical advocate skills. He was described as able, trustworthy and narrow-minded. Most unfortunately a deranged individual, Bellingham, who claimed to have received no compensation from the government in respect of an unpaid debt in Russia, entered the Parliament building and assassinated Perceval.
A large number of PMs have been members of an Inn of Court, but as honorary members. For example, Lord Sidmouth, Lord Grenville, George Canning, Lord Goderich, Lord Melbourne, Sir Robert Peel, Disraeli, Gladstone, Lord Salisbury and Neville Chamberlain were all Lincoln’s Inn; and Winston Churchill and Edward Heath were Gray’s Inn; and Eden, Macmillan, Major and Cameron Middle Temple; and Callaghan Inner Temple.
Herbert Henry Asquith, born 1852, was PM from 1908-1916. He excelled as an undergraduate in classics at Oxford, was called to the Bar by Lincoln’s Inn and practised at the Bar, with some success, though did not take silk. He was drawn into politics, aged 34, and soon excelled in public office under PM Gladstone. Asquith was the perfect peace-time PM. But he proved unequal to the task of leading the country in World War I, and was forced to resign in 1916, never able to inspire the nation.
David Lloyd George, born 1863 in Wales, qualified as a solicitor as a young man and engaged in small-time practice in North Wales. But he had political ambitions from the start; MP in 1890 aged 27. He was bilingual Welsh and English, and a truly fine speaker. Many said that from experience he had developed the pulpit manner. He clearly had high political aspirations, right from the beginning. In office from 1905 he soon dominated the House of Commons, and brought in old age pensions and curbed the powers of the House of Lords. In WWI he organised the production of munitions in 1915 and 1916-1918 he led the nation to victory. Unfortunately, the negotiated peace in the Treaty of Versailles was not a success, nor was his peace-time premiership.
Clement Atlee, born 1883, was a somewhat shy seemingly unambitious man, called to the Bar by Inner Temple in 1906 aged 23. He practised for a few years, but without much enthusiasm. Charitable work in the East End of London suited him better. Wounded in WWI, he never returned to the Bar. His political career was largely governed by chance. The Labour Party leadership fell vacant in 1935, and he became Leader. Deputy PM in 1940 in Winston Churchill’s coalition government, Atlee went on to win a landslide political victory at the end of the war in 1945. He was easily underestimated. He kept control of a cabinet of egotistical men; he wasted no words; he developed a quiet but highly effective leadership; he carried through a vast legislative programme.
Margaret Thatcher, born 1925, came from a modest middle class Methodist background, read Chemistry at Oxford, and started work as a research chemist. By age 24 she was a parliamentary candidate, trying several times, ultimately elected 1959 aged 34. Meanwhile she qualified as a barrister, Lincoln’s Inn, specialising in tax. As Leader of the Opposition, always a powerful opponent. In office 11½ years, ultimately she achieved the Order of Merit and the Garter, and was given a virtual state funeral, equalled only by Winston Churchill. Her law stood her in very good stead.
Tony Blair read law at Oxford, was called by Lincoln’s, started as a pupil in the chambers of Derry Irvine (a leading Labour activist), married a fellow pupil in the same chambers, and seemed well set for a legal career. But aged 29 he was seeking a parliamentary seat, aged 30 he had one, and by 41 he was the Leader of the Labour Party. By 44 he was PM (and appointed Derry Irvine as Lord Chancellor). His three successful general elections, his ten years in office, and some political achievements, were clouded by the general perception (after the event) that his involvement in the Iraq was a serious mistake. As a lawyer could he or should he have avoided that mistake?
Asquith, Lloyd George, Atlee, Thatcher and Blair all showed themselves in their early years to be capable lawyers. But all set their minds on a political career, and all brought their legal skills, along with other skills, to bear upon generally successful careers as PM.
Sir Keir Starmer – the only openly aspiring lawyer-PM today
Just as there are different sorts of lawyers, namely solicitor, barrister, practising and non-practising, the lawyer who goes into accountancy or business or journalism or public administration, and academia, there are different types of lawyer-politician. There is the lawyer who sets out to be a professional lawyer, and somehow accidentally gets drawn into politics; and the lawyer who sets out to be a professional lawyer only insofar as this serves as an intentional or hopeful stepping-stone to politics.
When we debate who was the finest orator of all time, we think of Cicero and Demosthenes. When Cicero, a sort of Roman lawyer, spoke, the people said: ‘What a marvellous speaker!’ When Demosthenes spoke, a sort of Greek politician, the people said: ‘Let’s march!’ The winner was clear.
Lawyers, however, undoubtedly bring strengths to the office of PM. They are the power of analysis, relevance, logic, order, argument, advocacy, oratory, persuasion, balance and judgement. As a skilled negotiator they can promote peace. As a dynamic character they can give leadership in war. However, there can be damaging weaknesses. They may be, or at least seen to be, dull, boring, balanced, pedantic, petty, too intellectual, too clever, too much concerned with procedure and detail, perhaps lacking in leadership, charisma, passion. Asquith, for example, was first rate in peace time, a failure in war. Lloyd George was highly controversial in peace time, but a huge success in war.
And before the advent of the office of PM as we know it today, the Sovereign had the equivalent, namely the Lord Chancellor or the First Secretary. Thomas Beckett, a canon lawyer, enraged Henry II in 1170 by insisting upon the legal rights of the church, with unfortunate consequences. Thomas Cromwell, Gray’s Inn, made an error of judgement in selecting Anne of Cleves as a wife for Henry VIII and fell out of royal favour 1540 (a capital offence at the time). The Cecils, father and son, William Cecil, Lord Burghley and Robert Cecil, both of Gray’s Inn, were lawyers and highly successful principal ministers to Elizabeth I.
So, the candidates for consideration since Walpole became the first PM in 1721, ie in modern times, appear to be: Spencer Perceval, Henry Herbert Asquith, David Lloyd George, Clement Atlee, Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair. Sir Keir Starmer, Leader of the Labour Party and Leader of the Opposition, appears at the moment to be the only openly aspiring lawyer PM.
Spencer Perceval (PM 1809-1812) was a professional barrister of some standing. He was a son of the Earl of Egmont though he had to make his own way. He was a good debater, quick on his feet, displaying typical advocate skills. He was described as able, trustworthy and narrow-minded. Most unfortunately a deranged individual, Bellingham, who claimed to have received no compensation from the government in respect of an unpaid debt in Russia, entered the Parliament building and assassinated Perceval.
A large number of PMs have been members of an Inn of Court, but as honorary members. For example, Lord Sidmouth, Lord Grenville, George Canning, Lord Goderich, Lord Melbourne, Sir Robert Peel, Disraeli, Gladstone, Lord Salisbury and Neville Chamberlain were all Lincoln’s Inn; and Winston Churchill and Edward Heath were Gray’s Inn; and Eden, Macmillan, Major and Cameron Middle Temple; and Callaghan Inner Temple.
Herbert Henry Asquith, born 1852, was PM from 1908-1916. He excelled as an undergraduate in classics at Oxford, was called to the Bar by Lincoln’s Inn and practised at the Bar, with some success, though did not take silk. He was drawn into politics, aged 34, and soon excelled in public office under PM Gladstone. Asquith was the perfect peace-time PM. But he proved unequal to the task of leading the country in World War I, and was forced to resign in 1916, never able to inspire the nation.
David Lloyd George, born 1863 in Wales, qualified as a solicitor as a young man and engaged in small-time practice in North Wales. But he had political ambitions from the start; MP in 1890 aged 27. He was bilingual Welsh and English, and a truly fine speaker. Many said that from experience he had developed the pulpit manner. He clearly had high political aspirations, right from the beginning. In office from 1905 he soon dominated the House of Commons, and brought in old age pensions and curbed the powers of the House of Lords. In WWI he organised the production of munitions in 1915 and 1916-1918 he led the nation to victory. Unfortunately, the negotiated peace in the Treaty of Versailles was not a success, nor was his peace-time premiership.
Clement Atlee, born 1883, was a somewhat shy seemingly unambitious man, called to the Bar by Inner Temple in 1906 aged 23. He practised for a few years, but without much enthusiasm. Charitable work in the East End of London suited him better. Wounded in WWI, he never returned to the Bar. His political career was largely governed by chance. The Labour Party leadership fell vacant in 1935, and he became Leader. Deputy PM in 1940 in Winston Churchill’s coalition government, Atlee went on to win a landslide political victory at the end of the war in 1945. He was easily underestimated. He kept control of a cabinet of egotistical men; he wasted no words; he developed a quiet but highly effective leadership; he carried through a vast legislative programme.
Margaret Thatcher, born 1925, came from a modest middle class Methodist background, read Chemistry at Oxford, and started work as a research chemist. By age 24 she was a parliamentary candidate, trying several times, ultimately elected 1959 aged 34. Meanwhile she qualified as a barrister, Lincoln’s Inn, specialising in tax. As Leader of the Opposition, always a powerful opponent. In office 11½ years, ultimately she achieved the Order of Merit and the Garter, and was given a virtual state funeral, equalled only by Winston Churchill. Her law stood her in very good stead.
Tony Blair read law at Oxford, was called by Lincoln’s, started as a pupil in the chambers of Derry Irvine (a leading Labour activist), married a fellow pupil in the same chambers, and seemed well set for a legal career. But aged 29 he was seeking a parliamentary seat, aged 30 he had one, and by 41 he was the Leader of the Labour Party. By 44 he was PM (and appointed Derry Irvine as Lord Chancellor). His three successful general elections, his ten years in office, and some political achievements, were clouded by the general perception (after the event) that his involvement in the Iraq was a serious mistake. As a lawyer could he or should he have avoided that mistake?
Asquith, Lloyd George, Atlee, Thatcher and Blair all showed themselves in their early years to be capable lawyers. But all set their minds on a political career, and all brought their legal skills, along with other skills, to bear upon generally successful careers as PM.
Sir Keir Starmer – the only openly aspiring lawyer-PM today
As we look ahead to Justice Week 2022, the sustainability of the Criminal Bar remains a critical issue for the government to address
Opportunity for female sopranos/contraltos in secondary education, or who have recently finished secondary education but have not yet begun tertiary education. Eligibility includes children of members of the Bar
Fear of the collection and test process is a common factor among clients, especially among vulnerable adults in complex family law cases. Cansford Laboratories shares some tips to help the testing process run as smoothly as possible
Casey Randall explains how complex relationship DNA tests can best be used – and interpreted – by counsel
Casey Randall, Head of DNA at AlphaBiolabs, explores what barristers need to know about DNA testing for immigration, including when a client might wish to submit DNA evidence, and which relationship tests are best for immigration applications
Julian Morgan reminds barristers of the top five areas to consider before 5 April
Barristers are particularly at risk of burnout because of the nature of our work and our approach to it but it doesnt have to be this way. Jade Bucklow explores how culture, work and lifestyle changes can rejuvinate our mental health...
The case ofR v Brecanihas complicated matters for defence lawyers. Emma Fielding talks to gang culture expert, Dr Simon Harding about County Lines, exploitation and modern slavery
If the Bar cannot define and prohibit bullying behaviour, what chance do we have of persuading the Judiciary to do so? Darren Howe QC and Professor Jo Delahunty QC's call to action on codification plus suggested strategies for dealing with bullying from the Bar and Bench
The Schools Consent Project (SCP) is educating tens of thousands of teenagers about the law around consent to challenge and change what is now endemic behaviour. Here, its founder, barrister Kate Parker talks to Chris Henley QC about SCPs work and its association with Jodie Comers West End playPrima Facie, in which she plays a criminal barrister who is sexually assaulted
Professionally embarrassed? The circumstances in which criminal barristers may return instructions to appear at trial have become clearer following the Court of Appeal judgment inR v Daniels By Abigail Bright
