*/
Criminal Bar Association
This was a nuts and bolts session, full of practical and unrhetorical advice, with some golden nuggets. Designed to encourage audience participation and chaired by Angela Rafferty QC in a friendly, laid-back way, it was positive in character and content. I sensed the need for that from a number of concerned questions, for the criminal Bar is surviving against the odds and our young are suffering. ‘How do they help themselves?’ asked one delegate. Try not to be pigeon holed. Become an expert in your own field. Offer an article to Counsel! Good ideas came consistently from HHJ Deborah Taylor and Eleanor Laws QC.
Naturally the panel discussed the problems raised by coming back to practice after childbirth. Diversity also recognised younger male barristers who may have caring responsibilities. HHJ Peter Rooke QC, having described himself as the statutory male on the panel, gave a picture of the bad old days in chambers, now gone. Later he stressed the absolute importance of showing your quality, eg knowing the law of evidence backwards.
Advice too for preparing for Silk or judicial posts. Good record-keeping, preparation and getting an independent figure to review your applications. Try to prosecute and defend. Know the criteria. In other words, bring the professionalism which governs your work to your own career path. HHJ Taylor said that the competition on one occasion had been 1,500 applications for 60 judicial placements. There is no ‘we’ – it must be ‘I’, for you must evidence fully your own competencies. The panel also contained one fluent younger practitioner, Emma Fenn, who will go far.
As a top tip, I liked the advice – be brief, be bright, be gone! Don’t whisper or make faces or talk over the judge. Don’t ever make personal attacks on your opponents. Be aware of legal developments. Sitting will improve your own advocacy, as you suffer pleas in aggravation. Preparation must not be too rigid, for part of cross examination is what falls out of the tree. There followed a constructive audience response of mentoring in chambers. Your correspondent’s view is that, ideally, it should continue for at least three years after pupillage.
Near the end, a very experienced old hand, Peter Birkett QC raised the topic of criminal pupillages. The response was how rare they are, particularly in London. That for me was the most sobering moment. The Criminal Bar Association must fight on and chambers must work with them.
Nigel is a former leader of the Western Circuit, practises crime from Pump Court Chambers, and is a Master of Drama in the Inner Temple. He is on the editorial board of Counsel.
This was a nuts and bolts session, full of practical and unrhetorical advice, with some golden nuggets. Designed to encourage audience participation and chaired by Angela Rafferty QC in a friendly, laid-back way, it was positive in character and content. I sensed the need for that from a number of concerned questions, for the criminal Bar is surviving against the odds and our young are suffering. ‘How do they help themselves?’ asked one delegate. Try not to be pigeon holed. Become an expert in your own field. Offer an article to Counsel! Good ideas came consistently from HHJ Deborah Taylor and Eleanor Laws QC.
Naturally the panel discussed the problems raised by coming back to practice after childbirth. Diversity also recognised younger male barristers who may have caring responsibilities. HHJ Peter Rooke QC, having described himself as the statutory male on the panel, gave a picture of the bad old days in chambers, now gone. Later he stressed the absolute importance of showing your quality, eg knowing the law of evidence backwards.
Advice too for preparing for Silk or judicial posts. Good record-keeping, preparation and getting an independent figure to review your applications. Try to prosecute and defend. Know the criteria. In other words, bring the professionalism which governs your work to your own career path. HHJ Taylor said that the competition on one occasion had been 1,500 applications for 60 judicial placements. There is no ‘we’ – it must be ‘I’, for you must evidence fully your own competencies. The panel also contained one fluent younger practitioner, Emma Fenn, who will go far.
As a top tip, I liked the advice – be brief, be bright, be gone! Don’t whisper or make faces or talk over the judge. Don’t ever make personal attacks on your opponents. Be aware of legal developments. Sitting will improve your own advocacy, as you suffer pleas in aggravation. Preparation must not be too rigid, for part of cross examination is what falls out of the tree. There followed a constructive audience response of mentoring in chambers. Your correspondent’s view is that, ideally, it should continue for at least three years after pupillage.
Near the end, a very experienced old hand, Peter Birkett QC raised the topic of criminal pupillages. The response was how rare they are, particularly in London. That for me was the most sobering moment. The Criminal Bar Association must fight on and chambers must work with them.
Criminal Bar Association
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
Kindness Ambassadors – coming to a courtroom near you! Valerie Charbit, Nicola Shannon KC and Professor Robin Banerjee update readers on the second phase of the project examining, and promoting, the impact of kindness and how it can fit into an adversarial system
