*/
Lord Phillips, President of the Supreme Court, has mounted a staunch defence of the Human Rights Act 1988.
In a forthright speech at Gresham College in June, Lord Phillips said the 1998 Act was “a vital part of the foundation of our fight against terrorism”. “In my opinion, the enactment of the Human Rights Act by the previous administration was an outstanding contribution to the upholding of the rule of law in this country and one for which it deserves great credit,” he said. “Because it requires the courts to scrutinise not merely executive action but Acts of Parliament to make sure that these respect human rights, the Act has given the Supreme Court some of the functions of a Constitutional Court. Drawing the right line between protecting the rights of the individual and respecting the supremacy of Parliament is, I believe, our greatest challenge.”
However, he noted that the Act and the judges who applied it had been unfairly criticised by senior politicians and the media. Charles Clarke, when Home Secretary, claimed, “the judiciary bears not the slightest responsibility for protecting the public” Lord Phillips said: “Charles Clarke failed to appreciate that it is the duty of the judiciary to apply the laws that have been enacted by Parliament.”
In a forthright speech at Gresham College in June, Lord Phillips said the 1998 Act was “a vital part of the foundation of our fight against terrorism”. “In my opinion, the enactment of the Human Rights Act by the previous administration was an outstanding contribution to the upholding of the rule of law in this country and one for which it deserves great credit,” he said. “Because it requires the courts to scrutinise not merely executive action but Acts of Parliament to make sure that these respect human rights, the Act has given the Supreme Court some of the functions of a Constitutional Court. Drawing the right line between protecting the rights of the individual and respecting the supremacy of Parliament is, I believe, our greatest challenge.”
However, he noted that the Act and the judges who applied it had been unfairly criticised by senior politicians and the media. Charles Clarke, when Home Secretary, claimed, “the judiciary bears not the slightest responsibility for protecting the public” Lord Phillips said: “Charles Clarke failed to appreciate that it is the duty of the judiciary to apply the laws that have been enacted by Parliament.”
Lord Phillips, President of the Supreme Court, has mounted a staunch defence of the Human Rights Act 1988.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
