*/
Cryptoassets are mainstream these days: the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) reported a rise of 400,000 investors since March 2020, and 2.3 million UK adults now hold cryptoassets. This brings opportunity for fraudsters who target cryptoassets or use crypto to dissipate assets from any fraud. Our collaboration with Asset Reality and Chainalysis will help support the ecosystem of this revolutionary technology by providing a streamlined in-house cradle-to-grave investigation and asset recovery service.
The recovery of misappropriated cryptoassets has many success stories, but this has not yet deterred criminals, and we have seen adaptation to the changing environment as enforcement agencies and asset recovery specialists flex their muscles. Ransomware attacks were reportedly up 311% between 2019 and 2020, with USD350 million paid by victims.* The number is likely to be far higher when you consider thwarted and unreported attacks. Individual payments to wallet addresses known for scams are up from 5 million to 7.3 million in the same period; a 48% increase in victims.* Criminals are using mixers and tumblers to obfuscate their trails, and even pose as an asset recovery specialist or a party connected to a bad actor. Some victims are so overcome from the first attack that they will seize on any hope, often paying the price a second time.
It is not that different. Blockchain analysis allows us to trace the flow of funds through an unlimited number of hops (akin to having every bank statement you need). Some working in this space can be too focused on this element and there are benefits to applying more ‘traditional’ asset tracing techniques to broaden the scope of the investigation. Corporate intelligence skills, including the use of OSINT, domain name investigations and social media capture can help identify ‘real world’ targets. Receiverships or insolvency procedures bring significant powers of investigation and a wide range of recovery actions.
There is a strong appetite within UK government agencies to get to grips with this trend. Met Police seizures have proven that these assets are traceable, storable and sellable. Our webinars with HMRC, the National Crime Agency and the Insolvency Service are among the most popular we have ever held. Judging by the recent report of HMRC sending ‘nudge’ letters to crypto investors over unpaid tax, it is just a matter of time before they will be on the cryptoasset seizure leaderboard. We are still in the ‘temporary registration regime’ stage of regulation so it is probably premature to talk about stronger regulation. The vast majority of cryptoasset use is for legitimate purposes and, given the huge variation in government approaches across the world, the UK has an opportunity to support this nascent space and derive the economic benefits. The real issue is how government agencies and asset recovery professionals will be empowered to pursue criminals, who find victims on social media platforms safe in the knowledge that tech giants are ineffective gate-keepers. The Online Safety Bill is interesting; the government has agreed to tackle online scams following pressure from the FCA and others, although not fraud via advertising, emails or cloned websites.
Maintaining this status will rely on a collective will to support the cryptoasset ecosystem and bring it further into the mainstream. The decentralised nature of crypto may make it resistant to traditional regulation, but it behoves all levels of investor to have some sort of recourse in the event of fraud. More streamlined and cost-effective investigation and asset recovery can help, and CFAAR (the network of lawyers, forensic accountants, corporate intelligence and asset recovery professionals focused on crypto fraud and asset recovery) will encourage a collaborative mindset focused on enforcing the judgments of our courts and achieving restitution for victims.
Carmel King is a Director in Grant Thornton UK LLP’s Insolvency and Asset Recovery practice, and a founding member of CFAAR, with more than 15 years’ experience in recovering funds for clients who have suffered a financial loss as a result of fraud.
Cryptoassets are mainstream these days: the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) reported a rise of 400,000 investors since March 2020, and 2.3 million UK adults now hold cryptoassets. This brings opportunity for fraudsters who target cryptoassets or use crypto to dissipate assets from any fraud. Our collaboration with Asset Reality and Chainalysis will help support the ecosystem of this revolutionary technology by providing a streamlined in-house cradle-to-grave investigation and asset recovery service.
The recovery of misappropriated cryptoassets has many success stories, but this has not yet deterred criminals, and we have seen adaptation to the changing environment as enforcement agencies and asset recovery specialists flex their muscles. Ransomware attacks were reportedly up 311% between 2019 and 2020, with USD350 million paid by victims.* The number is likely to be far higher when you consider thwarted and unreported attacks. Individual payments to wallet addresses known for scams are up from 5 million to 7.3 million in the same period; a 48% increase in victims.* Criminals are using mixers and tumblers to obfuscate their trails, and even pose as an asset recovery specialist or a party connected to a bad actor. Some victims are so overcome from the first attack that they will seize on any hope, often paying the price a second time.
It is not that different. Blockchain analysis allows us to trace the flow of funds through an unlimited number of hops (akin to having every bank statement you need). Some working in this space can be too focused on this element and there are benefits to applying more ‘traditional’ asset tracing techniques to broaden the scope of the investigation. Corporate intelligence skills, including the use of OSINT, domain name investigations and social media capture can help identify ‘real world’ targets. Receiverships or insolvency procedures bring significant powers of investigation and a wide range of recovery actions.
There is a strong appetite within UK government agencies to get to grips with this trend. Met Police seizures have proven that these assets are traceable, storable and sellable. Our webinars with HMRC, the National Crime Agency and the Insolvency Service are among the most popular we have ever held. Judging by the recent report of HMRC sending ‘nudge’ letters to crypto investors over unpaid tax, it is just a matter of time before they will be on the cryptoasset seizure leaderboard. We are still in the ‘temporary registration regime’ stage of regulation so it is probably premature to talk about stronger regulation. The vast majority of cryptoasset use is for legitimate purposes and, given the huge variation in government approaches across the world, the UK has an opportunity to support this nascent space and derive the economic benefits. The real issue is how government agencies and asset recovery professionals will be empowered to pursue criminals, who find victims on social media platforms safe in the knowledge that tech giants are ineffective gate-keepers. The Online Safety Bill is interesting; the government has agreed to tackle online scams following pressure from the FCA and others, although not fraud via advertising, emails or cloned websites.
Maintaining this status will rely on a collective will to support the cryptoasset ecosystem and bring it further into the mainstream. The decentralised nature of crypto may make it resistant to traditional regulation, but it behoves all levels of investor to have some sort of recourse in the event of fraud. More streamlined and cost-effective investigation and asset recovery can help, and CFAAR (the network of lawyers, forensic accountants, corporate intelligence and asset recovery professionals focused on crypto fraud and asset recovery) will encourage a collaborative mindset focused on enforcing the judgments of our courts and achieving restitution for victims.
On both fronts – representing the Bar’s interests and protecting the rule of law
Kate West discusses how best to interpret a drug test report, and the common misconceptions about what can be learnt from a drug test
Ashley Hodgkinson looks at drug testing methods and some of the most common ways people try to cheat a drug test
Clerksroom Chambers has recruited Matthew Wildish from 3 Paper Buildings (3PB) to a newly created position of Director of Clerking. Matthew joined the team at Clerksroom on 1 June
... have you seen through yours? asks Julian Morgan
Opportunity for female sopranos/contraltos in secondary education, or who have recently finished secondary education but have not yet begun tertiary education. Eligibility includes children of members of the Bar
Clerksroom Chambers has recruited Matthew Wildish from 3 Paper Buildings (3PB) to a newly created position of Director of Clerking. Matthew joined the team at Clerksroom on 1 June
In this tale of hope, success really has been the best revenge! A difficult journey teaches Rehana Azib QC invaluable lessons along the way
This article is not designed to offend the Judiciary but the quiet word has only taken us so far it is time concerns were recorded formally, says the first set to introduce an external bullying policy By Eleanor Laws QC, Oliver Mosley and Kyan Pucks
The Chief Inspector of the CPS knows first-hand the difficulties prosecutors face but is no pushover. He talks to Anthony Inglese CB about Operation Soteria, putting victims and cooperation at the heart of criminal justice reform, and his unique and life-changing career prosecuting the crime of all crimes, genocide
Having represented many Davids against many Goliaths over a 30+year career at the publicly funded Bar, renowned silk Professor Leslie Thomas QC critically assesses what the Human Rights Act currently under challenge has done for coronial law and equality of arms
