*/
‘Robert Alexander was the undisputed King of the English Bar for 15 years.’ Thus begins Lord Sumption’s Foreword to these brilliant and humane memoirs, now published posthumously. Apart from his achievements as an advocate, Bob Alexander was also Chair of the Bar, of JUSTICE, of the National Westminster Bank, and of the Royal Shakespeare Company, President of the MCC, Treasurer of Middle Temple and Chancellor of Exeter University.
The flavour of the man, though, can be seen in his self-description of why he thought he could succeed at the Bar:
‘Success at the Bar calls for a good, incisive mind and skilled and sensitive advocacy. I had not managed to get a first class degree and had not seen myself as a serious player in the top intellectual league. I lacked the bottle… to speak in the Cambridge Union. I was sometimes diffident… But strangely I had always felt that I ought to be able to perform well in the structured environment of a courtroom.’
This is not false modesty. A striking aspect of the eight chapters – each of which deals with one of his notable cases – is the lack of any bragging. He provides a measured summary of each matter and considers how and why it turned out the way it did. He then allows himself to express his own opinion on the merits. Bob represented the government in the final stages of the GCHQ case which arose when its employees were abruptly told that they were henceforth banned from union membership. He won in the House of Lords but still felt that to be consulted before employment rights are changed ‘is a fundamental aspect of our general law’. His awareness of the need for consultation before people’s rights were affected led him (when Chair of the Bar) to take the Lord Chancellor to court for imposing only a small uplift in criminal legal aid after breaking off negotiations.
The memoirs describe his time in Singapore where he successfully represented Prime Minister, Lee Kuan Yew, who sued a political opponent for libel. A dozen years later Bob returned to represent unsuccessfully a solicitor detained in solitary confinement without trial on grounds of national security. After the appeal was heard, and despite having been on the ‘other side’ on this occasion, his old client, Lee Kuan Yew, invited him to dinner. They discussed many things, but not the case. Bob recalls Lee’s earlier advice that when dining with an opponent, Bob should stick to drinking white wine but to make sure his opponent drank red, which was apparently bad for the voice and would give Bob the advantage the next day in court.
Barristers will particularly enjoy the chapters about Bob’s cases, each of which have multiple learning points and give an insight into how major litigation is conducted. There is also a chapter on his time with the MCC, when he led the group that persuaded members to admit women. Longer chapters deal with Bob’s later career, at the National Westminster Bank and then his time with the Royal Shakespeare Company. His tenures coincided with challenging times for both. At NatWest he had to deal with a then old-fashioned organisation which was trying to take advantage of opportunities after ‘Big Bang’ but ran into the economic downturn from 1990. The RSC grappled with financial worries and trying to find suitable London venues, while at the same time the artistic director departed. Bob stepped down from the RSC ‘with relief and regret’.
Bob died before he had finished the memoir and two uncompleted chapters are not included. Barrister readers will note throughout his love of the Bar and its companionship. They in turn will recognise what he is talking about.
‘Robert Alexander was the undisputed King of the English Bar for 15 years.’ Thus begins Lord Sumption’s Foreword to these brilliant and humane memoirs, now published posthumously. Apart from his achievements as an advocate, Bob Alexander was also Chair of the Bar, of JUSTICE, of the National Westminster Bank, and of the Royal Shakespeare Company, President of the MCC, Treasurer of Middle Temple and Chancellor of Exeter University.
The flavour of the man, though, can be seen in his self-description of why he thought he could succeed at the Bar:
‘Success at the Bar calls for a good, incisive mind and skilled and sensitive advocacy. I had not managed to get a first class degree and had not seen myself as a serious player in the top intellectual league. I lacked the bottle… to speak in the Cambridge Union. I was sometimes diffident… But strangely I had always felt that I ought to be able to perform well in the structured environment of a courtroom.’
This is not false modesty. A striking aspect of the eight chapters – each of which deals with one of his notable cases – is the lack of any bragging. He provides a measured summary of each matter and considers how and why it turned out the way it did. He then allows himself to express his own opinion on the merits. Bob represented the government in the final stages of the GCHQ case which arose when its employees were abruptly told that they were henceforth banned from union membership. He won in the House of Lords but still felt that to be consulted before employment rights are changed ‘is a fundamental aspect of our general law’. His awareness of the need for consultation before people’s rights were affected led him (when Chair of the Bar) to take the Lord Chancellor to court for imposing only a small uplift in criminal legal aid after breaking off negotiations.
The memoirs describe his time in Singapore where he successfully represented Prime Minister, Lee Kuan Yew, who sued a political opponent for libel. A dozen years later Bob returned to represent unsuccessfully a solicitor detained in solitary confinement without trial on grounds of national security. After the appeal was heard, and despite having been on the ‘other side’ on this occasion, his old client, Lee Kuan Yew, invited him to dinner. They discussed many things, but not the case. Bob recalls Lee’s earlier advice that when dining with an opponent, Bob should stick to drinking white wine but to make sure his opponent drank red, which was apparently bad for the voice and would give Bob the advantage the next day in court.
Barristers will particularly enjoy the chapters about Bob’s cases, each of which have multiple learning points and give an insight into how major litigation is conducted. There is also a chapter on his time with the MCC, when he led the group that persuaded members to admit women. Longer chapters deal with Bob’s later career, at the National Westminster Bank and then his time with the Royal Shakespeare Company. His tenures coincided with challenging times for both. At NatWest he had to deal with a then old-fashioned organisation which was trying to take advantage of opportunities after ‘Big Bang’ but ran into the economic downturn from 1990. The RSC grappled with financial worries and trying to find suitable London venues, while at the same time the artistic director departed. Bob stepped down from the RSC ‘with relief and regret’.
Bob died before he had finished the memoir and two uncompleted chapters are not included. Barrister readers will note throughout his love of the Bar and its companionship. They in turn will recognise what he is talking about.
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
National courts are now running the bulk of the world’s war crimes cases and corporate prosecutions are part of this growing trend, reports Chris Stephen