*/
The Supreme Court paved the way for appeals by some offenders found guilty of murder, ruling that the law of joint enterprise had been wrongly interpreted for three decades.
In R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 the court unanimously held that the courts had been in error in equating ‘foresight’ on the part of a co-accused who had not struck the fatal blow, with ‘intent to assist’ the principal.
The correct approach was to treat that foresight as ‘evidence of intent’ together with the rest of the evidence.
Delivering the judgment in February, the President of the Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger, said: ‘The courts took a wrong turn in 1984. And it is the responsibility of this court to put the law right.’
Almost 500 people are thought to have been convicted of murder between 2005 and 2013 as secondary parties in joint-enterprise cases, many in gang-related attacks.
In December 2014, the Commons’ Justice Select Committee called for an urgent review into its use to prevent overcharging and expressed concern that a large proportion of those convicted were young black and mixed race men.
Shauneen Lambe, director of Just for Kids Law which intervened in the case, highlighted the increase in number of children, including some who are vulnerable and have learning difficulties, who have been ‘locked up for crimes that they did not intend to happen nor were they directly involved in’.
The murder convictions of the two men involved in the case were set aside. Defendants seeking to appeal their convictions will have to show that they would suffer ‘substantial injustice’ if they were not able to do so. See also 'The world post-Jogee' in Counsel, April 2016.
The Supreme Court paved the way for appeals by some offenders found guilty of murder, ruling that the law of joint enterprise had been wrongly interpreted for three decades.
In R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 the court unanimously held that the courts had been in error in equating ‘foresight’ on the part of a co-accused who had not struck the fatal blow, with ‘intent to assist’ the principal.
The correct approach was to treat that foresight as ‘evidence of intent’ together with the rest of the evidence.
Delivering the judgment in February, the President of the Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger, said: ‘The courts took a wrong turn in 1984. And it is the responsibility of this court to put the law right.’
Almost 500 people are thought to have been convicted of murder between 2005 and 2013 as secondary parties in joint-enterprise cases, many in gang-related attacks.
In December 2014, the Commons’ Justice Select Committee called for an urgent review into its use to prevent overcharging and expressed concern that a large proportion of those convicted were young black and mixed race men.
Shauneen Lambe, director of Just for Kids Law which intervened in the case, highlighted the increase in number of children, including some who are vulnerable and have learning difficulties, who have been ‘locked up for crimes that they did not intend to happen nor were they directly involved in’.
The murder convictions of the two men involved in the case were set aside. Defendants seeking to appeal their convictions will have to show that they would suffer ‘substantial injustice’ if they were not able to do so. See also 'The world post-Jogee' in Counsel, April 2016.
As we look ahead to Justice Week 2022, the sustainability of the Criminal Bar remains a critical issue for the government to address
Opportunity for female sopranos/contraltos in secondary education, or who have recently finished secondary education but have not yet begun tertiary education. Eligibility includes children of members of the Bar
Fear of the collection and test process is a common factor among clients, especially among vulnerable adults in complex family law cases. Cansford Laboratories shares some tips to help the testing process run as smoothly as possible
Casey Randall explains how complex relationship DNA tests can best be used – and interpreted – by counsel
Casey Randall, Head of DNA at AlphaBiolabs, explores what barristers need to know about DNA testing for immigration, including when a client might wish to submit DNA evidence, and which relationship tests are best for immigration applications
Julian Morgan reminds barristers of the top five areas to consider before 5 April
The case ofR v Brecanihas complicated matters for defence lawyers. Emma Fielding talks to gang culture expert, Dr Simon Harding about County Lines, exploitation and modern slavery
Barristers are particularly at risk of burnout because of the nature of our work and our approach to it but it doesnt have to be this way. Jade Bucklow explores how culture, work and lifestyle changes can rejuvinate our mental health...
Professionally embarrassed? The circumstances in which criminal barristers may return instructions to appear at trial have become clearer following the Court of Appeal judgment inR v Daniels By Abigail Bright
The Schools Consent Project (SCP) is educating tens of thousands of teenagers about the law around consent to challenge and change what is now endemic behaviour. Here, its founder, barrister Kate Parker talks to Chris Henley QC about SCPs work and its association with Jodie Comers West End playPrima Facie, in which she plays a criminal barrister who is sexually assaulted
Following the launch of the Life at the Young Bar report and a nationwide listening exercise, Michael Polak and Michael Harwood outline the Young Barristers Committees raft of initiatives designed to address your issues of concern
