*/
The Supreme Court paved the way for appeals by some offenders found guilty of murder, ruling that the law of joint enterprise had been wrongly interpreted for three decades.
In R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 the court unanimously held that the courts had been in error in equating ‘foresight’ on the part of a co-accused who had not struck the fatal blow, with ‘intent to assist’ the principal.
The correct approach was to treat that foresight as ‘evidence of intent’ together with the rest of the evidence.
Delivering the judgment in February, the President of the Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger, said: ‘The courts took a wrong turn in 1984. And it is the responsibility of this court to put the law right.’
Almost 500 people are thought to have been convicted of murder between 2005 and 2013 as secondary parties in joint-enterprise cases, many in gang-related attacks.
In December 2014, the Commons’ Justice Select Committee called for an urgent review into its use to prevent overcharging and expressed concern that a large proportion of those convicted were young black and mixed race men.
Shauneen Lambe, director of Just for Kids Law which intervened in the case, highlighted the increase in number of children, including some who are vulnerable and have learning difficulties, who have been ‘locked up for crimes that they did not intend to happen nor were they directly involved in’.
The murder convictions of the two men involved in the case were set aside. Defendants seeking to appeal their convictions will have to show that they would suffer ‘substantial injustice’ if they were not able to do so. See also 'The world post-Jogee' in Counsel, April 2016.
The Supreme Court paved the way for appeals by some offenders found guilty of murder, ruling that the law of joint enterprise had been wrongly interpreted for three decades.
In R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 the court unanimously held that the courts had been in error in equating ‘foresight’ on the part of a co-accused who had not struck the fatal blow, with ‘intent to assist’ the principal.
The correct approach was to treat that foresight as ‘evidence of intent’ together with the rest of the evidence.
Delivering the judgment in February, the President of the Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger, said: ‘The courts took a wrong turn in 1984. And it is the responsibility of this court to put the law right.’
Almost 500 people are thought to have been convicted of murder between 2005 and 2013 as secondary parties in joint-enterprise cases, many in gang-related attacks.
In December 2014, the Commons’ Justice Select Committee called for an urgent review into its use to prevent overcharging and expressed concern that a large proportion of those convicted were young black and mixed race men.
Shauneen Lambe, director of Just for Kids Law which intervened in the case, highlighted the increase in number of children, including some who are vulnerable and have learning difficulties, who have been ‘locked up for crimes that they did not intend to happen nor were they directly involved in’.
The murder convictions of the two men involved in the case were set aside. Defendants seeking to appeal their convictions will have to show that they would suffer ‘substantial injustice’ if they were not able to do so. See also 'The world post-Jogee' in Counsel, April 2016.
Chair of the Bar sets out a busy calendar for the rest of the year
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal Profession’s Exacting Standards
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Examined by Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
Time is precious for barristers. Every moment spent chasing paperwork, organising diaries, or managing admin is time taken away from what matters most: preparation, advocacy and your clients. That’s where Eden Assistants step in
AlphaBiolabs has announced its latest Giving Back donation to RAY Ceredigion, a grassroots West Wales charity that provides play, learning and community opportunities for families across Ceredigion County
Despite increased awareness, why are AI hallucinations continuing to infiltrate court cases at an alarming rate? Matthew Lee investigates
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act is an assault on the English language and on civil liberties, argues Paul Harris SC, founder of the Bar Human Rights Committee
Come in with your eyes open, but don’t let fear cloud the prospect. A view from practice by John Dove
Anon Academic explains why he’s leaving the world of English literature for the Bar – after all, the two are not as far apart as they may first seem...
Review by Stephen Cragg KC