*/
Courts across the country could grind to a halt if the newly elected government proceeds with plans to reform criminal legal aid contracting and barristers vote for direct action in protest.
Before the general election, retired Court of Appeal judge, Sir Anthony Hooper, called on barristers to withdraw their labour if a Conservative government was elected.
Speaking at the Rally for Justice, organised by solicitor groups, he said: “If the Conservatives come back into power, it’s revolution time. We have to stop helping them and stop working.”
The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has balloted its 4,000-strong membership on whether they would support direct action if the government refuses to abandon the changes that would reduce the number of criminal solicitors’ firms from 1,600 to 527.
The action proposed is the “No Returns” policy of not covering for double-booked barristers – employed effectively over fee cuts last year – and “Days of Action”, effectively closing the courts as barristers withdraw their labour.
CBA chairman, Tony Cross QC, said the proposal will “damage deeply access to justice and deal a colossal blow to the self-employed Bar”.
Tony Cross said it would cause the closure of hundreds of law firms and put many solicitors out of jobs.
He said the change would put the independent in “jeopardy”. Work would “haemorrhage away” from the Bar as the large remaining firms increasingly retain advocacy in-house in order to make a profit.
Standards will plummet and “justice for all will suffer,” he said, while the government’s changes, motivated by “ideological nihilimsm”, will have no financial benefit.
Courts across the country could grind to a halt if the newly elected government proceeds with plans to reform criminal legal aid contracting and barristers vote for direct action in protest.
Before the general election, retired Court of Appeal judge, Sir Anthony Hooper, called on barristers to withdraw their labour if a Conservative government was elected.
Speaking at the Rally for Justice, organised by solicitor groups, he said: “If the Conservatives come back into power, it’s revolution time. We have to stop helping them and stop working.”
The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has balloted its 4,000-strong membership on whether they would support direct action if the government refuses to abandon the changes that would reduce the number of criminal solicitors’ firms from 1,600 to 527.
The action proposed is the “No Returns” policy of not covering for double-booked barristers – employed effectively over fee cuts last year – and “Days of Action”, effectively closing the courts as barristers withdraw their labour.
CBA chairman, Tony Cross QC, said the proposal will “damage deeply access to justice and deal a colossal blow to the self-employed Bar”.
Tony Cross said it would cause the closure of hundreds of law firms and put many solicitors out of jobs.
He said the change would put the independent in “jeopardy”. Work would “haemorrhage away” from the Bar as the large remaining firms increasingly retain advocacy in-house in order to make a profit.
Standards will plummet and “justice for all will suffer,” he said, while the government’s changes, motivated by “ideological nihilimsm”, will have no financial benefit.
Chair of the Bar sets out a busy calendar for the rest of the year
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal Profession’s Exacting Standards
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Examined by Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
Time is precious for barristers. Every moment spent chasing paperwork, organising diaries, or managing admin is time taken away from what matters most: preparation, advocacy and your clients. That’s where Eden Assistants step in
AlphaBiolabs has announced its latest Giving Back donation to RAY Ceredigion, a grassroots West Wales charity that provides play, learning and community opportunities for families across Ceredigion County
Despite increased awareness, why are AI hallucinations continuing to infiltrate court cases at an alarming rate? Matthew Lee investigates
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act is an assault on the English language and on civil liberties, argues Paul Harris SC, founder of the Bar Human Rights Committee
Come in with your eyes open, but don’t let fear cloud the prospect. A view from practice by John Dove
Anon Academic explains why he’s leaving the world of English literature for the Bar – after all, the two are not as far apart as they may first seem...
Review by Stephen Cragg KC