*/
Profession
Solicitors are being urged to negotiate alternative terms with barristers, following the introduction of the Bar’s new standard contractual terms.
The Law Society has claimed that the terms of engagement, which came into effect at the end of January, are “weighted strongly in favour of barristers”. In a practice note, the Society has raised particular concern over clauses strengthening barristers’ intellectual property rights; exclusions from liability; increased hourly rates; payment terms; and money laundering responsibilities.
Several firms of solicitors have contacted chambers to advise that they have no intention of agreeing to the new contractual terms.
The Bar Council has mounted a rigorous defence. Expressing surprise and disappointment, the Bar Council warned that “the Law Society’s proposed variations give rise to some serious potential difficulties. For example, some of the variations run counter to guidance already approved by the Law Society, and some might lead to barristers incurring liabilities which are not covered by their professional indemnity insurance, resulting in a risk of professional misconduct and detriment to lay clients. One would give the solicitor absolute discretion about when the barrister should be paid, which could lead to financial hardship for the barrister unless proper safeguards were agreed.”
Specific guidance from the Bar Council is available on the fees collection page of www.barcouncil.org.uk.
The Law Society has claimed that the terms of engagement, which came into effect at the end of January, are “weighted strongly in favour of barristers”. In a practice note, the Society has raised particular concern over clauses strengthening barristers’ intellectual property rights; exclusions from liability; increased hourly rates; payment terms; and money laundering responsibilities.
Several firms of solicitors have contacted chambers to advise that they have no intention of agreeing to the new contractual terms.
The Bar Council has mounted a rigorous defence. Expressing surprise and disappointment, the Bar Council warned that “the Law Society’s proposed variations give rise to some serious potential difficulties. For example, some of the variations run counter to guidance already approved by the Law Society, and some might lead to barristers incurring liabilities which are not covered by their professional indemnity insurance, resulting in a risk of professional misconduct and detriment to lay clients. One would give the solicitor absolute discretion about when the barrister should be paid, which could lead to financial hardship for the barrister unless proper safeguards were agreed.”
Specific guidance from the Bar Council is available on the fees collection page of www.barcouncil.org.uk.
Profession
Solicitors are being urged to negotiate alternative terms with barristers, following the introduction of the Bar’s new standard contractual terms.
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
The long-running fee-paid judicial pensions saga continues. The current cut-off date for giving notice of election to join FPJPS is 31 March 2024, and that date now gives rise to a serious problem, warns HH John Platt
