*/
Profession
Solicitors are being urged to negotiate alternative terms with barristers, following the introduction of the Bar’s new standard contractual terms.
The Law Society has claimed that the terms of engagement, which came into effect at the end of January, are “weighted strongly in favour of barristers”. In a practice note, the Society has raised particular concern over clauses strengthening barristers’ intellectual property rights; exclusions from liability; increased hourly rates; payment terms; and money laundering responsibilities.
Several firms of solicitors have contacted chambers to advise that they have no intention of agreeing to the new contractual terms.
The Bar Council has mounted a rigorous defence. Expressing surprise and disappointment, the Bar Council warned that “the Law Society’s proposed variations give rise to some serious potential difficulties. For example, some of the variations run counter to guidance already approved by the Law Society, and some might lead to barristers incurring liabilities which are not covered by their professional indemnity insurance, resulting in a risk of professional misconduct and detriment to lay clients. One would give the solicitor absolute discretion about when the barrister should be paid, which could lead to financial hardship for the barrister unless proper safeguards were agreed.”
Specific guidance from the Bar Council is available on the fees collection page of www.barcouncil.org.uk.
The Law Society has claimed that the terms of engagement, which came into effect at the end of January, are “weighted strongly in favour of barristers”. In a practice note, the Society has raised particular concern over clauses strengthening barristers’ intellectual property rights; exclusions from liability; increased hourly rates; payment terms; and money laundering responsibilities.
Several firms of solicitors have contacted chambers to advise that they have no intention of agreeing to the new contractual terms.
The Bar Council has mounted a rigorous defence. Expressing surprise and disappointment, the Bar Council warned that “the Law Society’s proposed variations give rise to some serious potential difficulties. For example, some of the variations run counter to guidance already approved by the Law Society, and some might lead to barristers incurring liabilities which are not covered by their professional indemnity insurance, resulting in a risk of professional misconduct and detriment to lay clients. One would give the solicitor absolute discretion about when the barrister should be paid, which could lead to financial hardship for the barrister unless proper safeguards were agreed.”
Specific guidance from the Bar Council is available on the fees collection page of www.barcouncil.org.uk.
Profession
Solicitors are being urged to negotiate alternative terms with barristers, following the introduction of the Bar’s new standard contractual terms.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
