The report, The attractiveness of senior judicial appointment to highly qualified practitioners, published in January and based on interviews with six recently appointed high court judges and 29 highly qualified solicitors and barristers, revealed that the effect of the Circuit requirement was, for some practitioners, “a temporary deterrent to judicial application as children are growing up, while for others it represents a permanent barrier to application”.
Lord Judge, the Lord Chief Justice, in his foreword, said the research reflected “misapprehensions” about judicial life on Circuit—in fact the system for Circuit visits was “extremely flexible” and some High Court judges did not visit a Circuit at all, he said. Although a “wholehearted defender” of the Circuit system, the Lord Chief Justice said that it is possible for arrangements to be made to accommodate judges whose circumstances mean that they cannot be away from home.
Professor Dame Hazel Genn, the report’s author, said: “Judges in post talked of the satisfaction offered by a judicial post, including the opportunity to be the decision-maker, the intellectual challenge, public service ethic, prestige and financial security.
“Practitioners not seeking a salaried judicial appointment said they were deterred by the workload and working conditions, salary, loss of autonomy, a preference for advocacy rather than decision making and a belief that their temperament is more suited to the Bar than the Bench.”
Commissioned by the Judicial Executive Board, the research is separate from current Judicial Appointments Commission research, which is due to complete in the spring. The report is available at www.judiciary.gov.uk/docs/report-sen-jud-appt.pdf.