*/
Legal Aid
The Council of Her Majesty’s Circuit Judges has submitted a stinging response to the Transforming legal aid consultation, questioning the evidence base of its “bald assertions” and criticising the short period of consultation.
The largest group of salaried judiciary said they were “deeply concerned that representation through legal aid is already not available to many” in the civil and family courts and that “in the future many accused of serious criminal offences will face trial without the proper protection of competent and appropriately resourced lawyers”.
Former Court of Appeal Judge Sir Anthony Hooper QC has also been vocal on his opposition to the proposed reforms. On BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on 4 June, Sir Anthony, who retired last year, warned of the impact of “government allocated providers” on quality: “Someone will turn up at the door and say ‘I’m representing you. And by the way, I’m employed by the following company’.” Conservative MP and barrister Bob Neill retorted: “I’m afraid it’s a little bit snobbish of Sir Anthony to talk about corporate providers and so on, at the end of the day everybody who comes through that system will have to pass a quality mark.” Sir Anthony, however, described the proposed quality assurance scheme as “gobbledygook”.
The largest group of salaried judiciary said they were “deeply concerned that representation through legal aid is already not available to many” in the civil and family courts and that “in the future many accused of serious criminal offences will face trial without the proper protection of competent and appropriately resourced lawyers”.
Former Court of Appeal Judge Sir Anthony Hooper QC has also been vocal on his opposition to the proposed reforms. On BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on 4 June, Sir Anthony, who retired last year, warned of the impact of “government allocated providers” on quality: “Someone will turn up at the door and say ‘I’m representing you. And by the way, I’m employed by the following company’.” Conservative MP and barrister Bob Neill retorted: “I’m afraid it’s a little bit snobbish of Sir Anthony to talk about corporate providers and so on, at the end of the day everybody who comes through that system will have to pass a quality mark.” Sir Anthony, however, described the proposed quality assurance scheme as “gobbledygook”.
Legal Aid
The Council of Her Majesty’s Circuit Judges has submitted a stinging response to the Transforming legal aid consultation, questioning the evidence base of its “bald assertions” and criticising the short period of consultation.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
