*/
Every set of barristers’ chambers would need to gather and publish statistics on the diversity of their members and staff, under new Legal Services Board (“LSB”) proposals.
Barristers, clerks and all chambers’ employees would be asked questions relevant to the new public sector equality duty – age, race, disability, religion or belief, gender reassignment, sex, pregnancy and maternity and sexual orientation – plus socio-economic background.
Participation would be voluntary and anonymous. Chambers would be required to publish the results and report it to the Bar Standards Board, even where there is no response or the response is “prefer not to say”.
The new duty would apply to all regulated legal services providers.
The LSB believes publishing the results will create competitive pressure among chambers and other providers to take action to increase diversity, and give regulators a clearer picture of levels of diversity and the success or otherwise of diversity initiatives such as the Bar Council’s mentoring and outreach programmes.
LSB Chairman, David Edmonds, said: “Through these measures there will be greater transparency and sharper scrutiny by regulators and consumers based on published data.
“Appropriate policies can then be developed on the basis of the evidence we collect.”
The consultation, “Increasing diversity and social mobility in the legal workforce: transparency and evidence”, closes on 9 March 2011.
Barristers, clerks and all chambers’ employees would be asked questions relevant to the new public sector equality duty – age, race, disability, religion or belief, gender reassignment, sex, pregnancy and maternity and sexual orientation – plus socio-economic background.
Participation would be voluntary and anonymous. Chambers would be required to publish the results and report it to the Bar Standards Board, even where there is no response or the response is “prefer not to say”.
The new duty would apply to all regulated legal services providers.
The LSB believes publishing the results will create competitive pressure among chambers and other providers to take action to increase diversity, and give regulators a clearer picture of levels of diversity and the success or otherwise of diversity initiatives such as the Bar Council’s mentoring and outreach programmes.
LSB Chairman, David Edmonds, said: “Through these measures there will be greater transparency and sharper scrutiny by regulators and consumers based on published data.
“Appropriate policies can then be developed on the basis of the evidence we collect.”
The consultation, “Increasing diversity and social mobility in the legal workforce: transparency and evidence”, closes on 9 March 2011.
Every set of barristers’ chambers would need to gather and publish statistics on the diversity of their members and staff, under new Legal Services Board (“LSB”) proposals.
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
AlphaBiolabs has donated £500 to The Christie Charity through its Giving Back initiative, helping to support cancer care, treatment and research across Greater Manchester, Cheshire and further afield
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
Are you ready for the new way to do tax returns? David Southern KC explains the biggest change since HMRC launched self-assessment more than 30 years ago... and its impact on the Bar
Professor Dominic Regan and Seán Jones KC present their best buys for this holiday season
Marking one year since a Bar disciplinary tribunal dismissed all charges against her, Dr Charlotte Proudman discusses the experience, her formative years and next steps. Interview by Anthony Inglese CB
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Pointillism, radical politics and social conscience. Review by Stephen Cragg KC
