*/
The Chairman of the Bar Council attacked the ‘grubby and squalid’ backhanders paid by some barristers in exchange for work from solicitors and backed Government plans to outlaw referral fees.
In his keynote address to the 30th Annual Bar Conference, Alistair MacDonald QC said such payments were ‘nothing short of a scandalous misuse of public funds’ and were ‘objectionable’ in every way.
‘Why should taxpayers’ money go to providing a backhander to a person placed in a position of trust by the state, to find and brief the best advocate for the lay client?’
Those who indulge in these ‘nefarious activities’, MacDonald said, are ever ready to seek new ways to hide the truth of what they are really about ‘under the cloak of a name such as an administration fee’.
But, he said: ‘An elephant remains an elephant, whether you call it an elephant or a ballerina.’
There is, said MacDonald, no place in the regime of advocacy fees for a legitimate administration fee.
He continued: ‘Like the drug cheats in sport, who are always one step ahead of those performing the tests, there are no depths to the ingenious means by which these charlatans would seek to dress up their referral fees.’
MacDonald said: ‘The only effective measure would be a complete ban on any payment by the selected advocate to the instructing solicitor. And that is the measure we will be urging in our response to the consultation.
‘There can be no half measures; there must be a complete ban.’
On the Government’s proposals to introduce Crown Court advocacy panels to ensure quality, the Chairman reassured barristers that they had nothing to fear.
He said any scheme should not distinguish between which branch of the profession – solicitor or barrister – the advocate comes from.
‘If a barrister, with his or her unique opportunities to hone their advocacy skills by a year of dedicated advocacy training followed by a year of pupillage and the support structure of chambers, cannot cut the mustard, there can be no excuses.’
But he said: ‘No advocate who does defence work to a high standard should have the slightest thing to fear from a panel scheme.’
Doughty St’s Joe Middleton has won the 2015 Bar Pro Bono Award. He was nominated by the Death Penalty Project. The award was announced at the Bar Conference.
The Chairman of the Bar Council attacked the ‘grubby and squalid’ backhanders paid by some barristers in exchange for work from solicitors and backed Government plans to outlaw referral fees.
In his keynote address to the 30th Annual Bar Conference, Alistair MacDonald QC said such payments were ‘nothing short of a scandalous misuse of public funds’ and were ‘objectionable’ in every way.
‘Why should taxpayers’ money go to providing a backhander to a person placed in a position of trust by the state, to find and brief the best advocate for the lay client?’
Those who indulge in these ‘nefarious activities’, MacDonald said, are ever ready to seek new ways to hide the truth of what they are really about ‘under the cloak of a name such as an administration fee’.
But, he said: ‘An elephant remains an elephant, whether you call it an elephant or a ballerina.’
There is, said MacDonald, no place in the regime of advocacy fees for a legitimate administration fee.
He continued: ‘Like the drug cheats in sport, who are always one step ahead of those performing the tests, there are no depths to the ingenious means by which these charlatans would seek to dress up their referral fees.’
MacDonald said: ‘The only effective measure would be a complete ban on any payment by the selected advocate to the instructing solicitor. And that is the measure we will be urging in our response to the consultation.
‘There can be no half measures; there must be a complete ban.’
On the Government’s proposals to introduce Crown Court advocacy panels to ensure quality, the Chairman reassured barristers that they had nothing to fear.
He said any scheme should not distinguish between which branch of the profession – solicitor or barrister – the advocate comes from.
‘If a barrister, with his or her unique opportunities to hone their advocacy skills by a year of dedicated advocacy training followed by a year of pupillage and the support structure of chambers, cannot cut the mustard, there can be no excuses.’
But he said: ‘No advocate who does defence work to a high standard should have the slightest thing to fear from a panel scheme.’
Doughty St’s Joe Middleton has won the 2015 Bar Pro Bono Award. He was nominated by the Death Penalty Project. The award was announced at the Bar Conference.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
