The Council’s initial exchange on the file in late October, focused on difficulties with the legal basis, the level of consumer protection, objective need and the complexity of embedding the proposal into the different national legal systems. The Bar’s initial views are summarised in the article on the Bar Council Brussels Office carried in the main body of this issue of Counsel.

EU developments on Collective redress

The Commission is due to issue a Communication setting out the results of its recent consultation, and considering next steps. The European Parliament (EP)’s committees on Legal Affairs Economic Affairs, and Internal Market and Consumer Protection, have all expressed their (varying) views on the way forward. See:

European Judicial Training – Commission Communication

In mid-September, the Commission published a Communication on judicial training for judges and practitioners, focussing on EU law, and setting out ambitious numerical targets for training (both pre- and post-qualification). Many of these plans will be put into practice in the coming months.

EU funding for projects in the Justice field

Calls for proposal for action grants and operating grants in the field of judicial cooperation should have been published during November, with a deadline for submission of applications in the first quarter of 2012. Any SBA or other Bar body interested in running an exchange/training/seminar
project involving at least one other Member State or an applicant country, should be checking these websites:

Civil: and

Freezing of assets

In September, the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation creating a European Account Preservation Order (EAPO) to facilitate cross-border debt recovery in civil and commercial matters. The UK, whilst supportive of the idea in principle, is not opting in to the proposal, because the current draft is too wide and lacks the controls and safeguards needed to prevent abuse of the measure. These concerns are widely held, so the legislative negotiations may resolve them. See:

Limitation periods in RTAs – Commission consultation

By the time of reading, the Commission is expected to be one month into a three-month public consultation on possible harmonisation of limitation periods, focussing in the first instance on Road Traffic Accident (RTA) claims. See:

ADR in civil, commercial and family matters

At the end of October, the EP in plenary adopted an own initiative report (Procedure reference INI(2011)2117) calling on the Commission to “explore providing a harmonised legal framework for some aspects of ADR across sectors” and otherwise encouraging its development and use. See:

The Commission’s is due to adopt proposals in this field by year’s end.

Brussels I regulation review

The EU institutions are negotiating the review of regulation 44/2001 on recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Procedure reference COD(2010)0383), with a view to agreeing the main elements before Christmas.

Sexual abuse and exploitation of children – final steps

The EP has formally adopted the 2010 proposal for a directive on combating the sexual abuse, sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, and repealing Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (COD(2010)064). See:

Formal Council adoption is now expected before year’s end.

The use of criminal law in enforcing EU policy

The Commission recently issued a Communication entitled Towards an EU Criminal Policy”, which is intended to enable the Union to define if, when and how to use criminal law to better enforce EU policy. See:

Consumer Rights Directive

Following three years of negotiations, the Consumer Rights Directive has been formally adopted. For the final text, go to:

Prevention of insider dealing and market manipulation

At the end of October, the Commission adopted a proposal for a Directive which requires Member States to apply criminal sanctions to the intentional or attempted commission of two types of market abuse offences: insider dealing and market manipulation (both defined in the proposal). In tandem, it adopted a complementary proposal for a regulation on insider dealing and market manipulation, establishing a common regulatory framework intended for financial markets in the EU. See: and

Reform of Commission’s antitrust procedures

In October, the Commission adopted a package of measures aimed at increasing interaction with parties in antitrust proceedings and strengthening the mechanisms for safeguarding parties’ procedural rights. The package also encompasses a revised Hearing Officer’s mandate, strengthening and expanding that role. See:

Modernisation of EU public procurement policy

In late October, the EP in plenary adopted its own-initiative report calling on the Commission to ensure that the future EU Public Procurement regime offers greater legal clarity; best value for money; simplification of the rules and greater procedural flexibility, whilst avoiding unfair advantages; better access for SMEs and an expansion of e-procurement. This report responds to the Commission’s spring 2011 consultation.

EP responds to VAT consultation

In October, the EP in Plenary adopted its own initiative report supporting the Commission’s plans for a comprehensive revamp of the VAT regime, designed in particular to prevent fraud, and seeking a Commission proposal, by the end of 2012 on “simplifying cross-border taxation”. See:

EP seeking revamp and extension of EU Insolvency laws

By the time of reading, the EP in plenary will likely have adopted an own-initiative report entitled “Insolvency proceedings in the context of EU company law”, encouraging the Commission to present legislative proposals on four main issues in the fi eld, updating existing EU legislation, and including the harmonisation of specific aspects of insolvency and company law. The EP document number is A7-0355/2011.

Credit agreements relating to residential property

The Economic Affairs Committee of the EP is due to adopt its report on this March 2011 proposal in December. It has the benefi t of the Legal Affair’s committee’s opinion, adopted in October. That opinion raises doubts about the need for the proposal, its suitability to achieve the stated objectives, and its content. See:

Mutual Evaluation of the Services Directive

On 25 October, the EP in Plenary adopted its report on the mutual evaluation process of the Services Directive and on the merits of mutual evaluation. See:

The status of In-house lawyers before the Luxembourg Courts

In-house lawyers await the appeals of the General Court of the EU’s decision in case T- 226/10 with trepidation. The substance of the claim before the Court was never adjudged upon, as the application was held inadmissible because the applicant was represented by its own in-house counsel, rather than external lawyers. By the time of reading, it should be clear whether entreaties by the Law Society and Bar to HMG, and similar actions elsewhere, have resulted in any interventions in support of the appeals. Developments on these and other current issues are reported on in Brussels News, the regular newsletter of the Brussels Offi ce for members of the Bar of England and Wales.